Outi Pitkänen , Tomas Moe Skjølsvold , Marianne Ryghaug
{"title":"Has activation run out of steam? Three imagined flexible publics in the Norwegian smart grid transition","authors":"Outi Pitkänen , Tomas Moe Skjølsvold , Marianne Ryghaug","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Expectations for technology development often contain taken-for-granted ideas about how groups of people will either adopt these technologies or endorse the policies meant to support the development of these technologies. This article explores how such imagined publics (Walker et al., 2010) figure in Norwegian energy professionals’ expectations for making electricity use increasingly <em>flexible</em> in its timing. We find that previously predominant expectations towards activating a public of energy demand managers have become nuanced and uncertain. Instead, the neatest package of expectations was towards a future Internet-of-Things arrangement where emerging aggregators remotely control fleets of energy-intensive household technologies. In addition, the fear that flexible consumption might not resonate beyond extra-interested users had led to innovating for a third, more situated public. We discuss the shift of expectations as a dynamic and contextual process rather than as a direct consequence of an increase in technological potential. We contend that the uncertainty of engaging the public in flexible consumption has been managed by shifting the realization of expectations further into the future. We note that currently, publics are not being engaged in flexibility development as more than consumers, which may complicate the goal of flexibility becoming a key characteristic of future energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 103627"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Expectations for technology development often contain taken-for-granted ideas about how groups of people will either adopt these technologies or endorse the policies meant to support the development of these technologies. This article explores how such imagined publics (Walker et al., 2010) figure in Norwegian energy professionals’ expectations for making electricity use increasingly flexible in its timing. We find that previously predominant expectations towards activating a public of energy demand managers have become nuanced and uncertain. Instead, the neatest package of expectations was towards a future Internet-of-Things arrangement where emerging aggregators remotely control fleets of energy-intensive household technologies. In addition, the fear that flexible consumption might not resonate beyond extra-interested users had led to innovating for a third, more situated public. We discuss the shift of expectations as a dynamic and contextual process rather than as a direct consequence of an increase in technological potential. We contend that the uncertainty of engaging the public in flexible consumption has been managed by shifting the realization of expectations further into the future. We note that currently, publics are not being engaged in flexibility development as more than consumers, which may complicate the goal of flexibility becoming a key characteristic of future energy systems.
对技术开发的期望通常包含想当然的想法,即一群人将如何采用这些技术或支持旨在支持这些技术开发的政策。这篇文章探讨了这些想象中的公众(Walker et al., 2010)是如何在挪威能源专业人士的期望中体现出来的,即使电力使用在时间上越来越灵活。我们发现,以前对激活能源需求管理人员公众的主要期望已经变得微妙和不确定。相反,人们对未来物联网(Internet-of-Things,简称iot)的期望最为一致,即新兴的集成商可以远程控制大量能源密集型家用技术。此外,由于担心弹性消费可能不会在特别感兴趣的用户之外引起共鸣,这导致了针对第三个更有地位的公众的创新。我们将期望的转变作为一个动态和情境过程来讨论,而不是作为技术潜力增加的直接后果。我们认为,通过将期望的实现进一步转移到未来,使公众参与灵活消费的不确定性得到了控制。我们注意到,目前,公众并没有像消费者那样更多地参与灵活性的发展,这可能会使灵活性成为未来能源系统的一个关键特征的目标复杂化。
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures