Ali Cherif , Ha-Jun Yoon , Joo-Sung Lee , Tesfalem Aregawi Atsbha , Mohamadamin Zarei , Sangwon Suh , John W. Sheffield , Chul-Jin Lee
{"title":"Unlocking low-carbon hydrogen transportation through a cost-effective hybrid CO2/heat looping strategy","authors":"Ali Cherif , Ha-Jun Yoon , Joo-Sung Lee , Tesfalem Aregawi Atsbha , Mohamadamin Zarei , Sangwon Suh , John W. Sheffield , Chul-Jin Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite its crucial role in renewable energy networks, hydrogen transportation incurs elevated costs and high carbon intensity (CI). To enable affordable low-carbon hydrogen, this study examined integrating a closed CO<sub>2</sub> and heat cycle via a dual solid carriers looping strategy to mitigate direct and indirect carbon emissions. A techno-environmental-economic analysis of the hydrogen transportation infrastructure was conducted on a large-scale overseas supply chain. This analysis involved base cases (i.e., LH<sub>2</sub>, LNH<sub>3</sub>, MeOH, formic acid, and dimethyl ether) and various combinations of hydrogen and CO<sub>2</sub>/heat dual carriers (i.e., CaO, ZnO, Li<sub>2</sub>O, and MgO). The results showed a considerable decrease in cost and carbon emissions through the integration of the CO<sub>2</sub>/heat closed cycle system. Particularly, the MeOH-ZnO route showed substantial improvement, achieving a CI reduction to 15.54 kgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kgH<sub>2</sub> (i.e., 46 % lower than that of the MeOH route), with a cost of 6.0 USD/kgH<sub>2</sub>. In the projected 2050 scenario, employing the CO<sub>2</sub>/heat looping system further reduced CI to as low as 0.7 kgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kgH<sub>2</sub> and a cost of up to 4.6 USD/kgH<sub>2</sub>, despite the use of costly renewable heat and direct air carbon capture. Integrating the CO<sub>2</sub>/heat looping system thus facilitates affordable, greener hydrogen transport, crucial for a sustainable energy economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 115848"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125005210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite its crucial role in renewable energy networks, hydrogen transportation incurs elevated costs and high carbon intensity (CI). To enable affordable low-carbon hydrogen, this study examined integrating a closed CO2 and heat cycle via a dual solid carriers looping strategy to mitigate direct and indirect carbon emissions. A techno-environmental-economic analysis of the hydrogen transportation infrastructure was conducted on a large-scale overseas supply chain. This analysis involved base cases (i.e., LH2, LNH3, MeOH, formic acid, and dimethyl ether) and various combinations of hydrogen and CO2/heat dual carriers (i.e., CaO, ZnO, Li2O, and MgO). The results showed a considerable decrease in cost and carbon emissions through the integration of the CO2/heat closed cycle system. Particularly, the MeOH-ZnO route showed substantial improvement, achieving a CI reduction to 15.54 kgCO2-eq/kgH2 (i.e., 46 % lower than that of the MeOH route), with a cost of 6.0 USD/kgH2. In the projected 2050 scenario, employing the CO2/heat looping system further reduced CI to as low as 0.7 kgCO2-eq/kgH2 and a cost of up to 4.6 USD/kgH2, despite the use of costly renewable heat and direct air carbon capture. Integrating the CO2/heat looping system thus facilitates affordable, greener hydrogen transport, crucial for a sustainable energy economy.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.