Test-retest reliability of cortical auditory evoked potential indices of central auditory nervous system inhibition in people with and without tinnitus
IF 2.5 2区 医学Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
{"title":"Test-retest reliability of cortical auditory evoked potential indices of central auditory nervous system inhibition in people with and without tinnitus","authors":"Kenneth Morse, Leah Morse","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) called onset-offset and sensory gating CAEPs. Further, this study compared test-retest reliability across people with and without tinnitus, across different stimulus frequencies (broadband noise, 0.25 kHz, 2 kHz, 8 kHz), and across different CAEP quantification approaches. The results of this study indicated that both sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs were reliable, however reliability was maximized under certain experimental conditions. Specifically, people with tinnitus did exhibit differences in reliability for the sensory gating CAEP, although this did depend on the bandpass filter that was used to analyze the sensory gating response. Further, reliability was the strongest when the stimulus was a broadband noise as opposed to frequency-specific tones. Regarding CAEP quantification approach, reliability was the strongest for CAEP types that were larger in amplitude and robust CAEP measurements including peak-to-peak amplitude and total response area. Overall, these findings do indicate that both the sensory gating and onset-offset CAEP are reliable for people with and without tinnitus. However, certain experimental methods can be applied to maximize reliability such as using a broadband noise stimulus and/or measuring peak-to-peak amplitude and total response area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"463 ","pages":"Article 109301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525001194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) called onset-offset and sensory gating CAEPs. Further, this study compared test-retest reliability across people with and without tinnitus, across different stimulus frequencies (broadband noise, 0.25 kHz, 2 kHz, 8 kHz), and across different CAEP quantification approaches. The results of this study indicated that both sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs were reliable, however reliability was maximized under certain experimental conditions. Specifically, people with tinnitus did exhibit differences in reliability for the sensory gating CAEP, although this did depend on the bandpass filter that was used to analyze the sensory gating response. Further, reliability was the strongest when the stimulus was a broadband noise as opposed to frequency-specific tones. Regarding CAEP quantification approach, reliability was the strongest for CAEP types that were larger in amplitude and robust CAEP measurements including peak-to-peak amplitude and total response area. Overall, these findings do indicate that both the sensory gating and onset-offset CAEP are reliable for people with and without tinnitus. However, certain experimental methods can be applied to maximize reliability such as using a broadband noise stimulus and/or measuring peak-to-peak amplitude and total response area.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.