From screens to grids: A web scrapping analysis of electricity access in sub-Saharan Africa

IF 2.2 Q1 Social Sciences
Pius Gamette , Simplice A. Asongu
{"title":"From screens to grids: A web scrapping analysis of electricity access in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Pius Gamette ,&nbsp;Simplice A. Asongu","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2025.107472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In view of the lagging position of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) compared to other regional blocs in accessing electricity coupled with the wide disparity in rural-urban access to electricity, this study adopts the scrapping method to efficiently gather and analyse social discourse in real time. From the YouTube platform, this study examined 887 comments from January 2014 to July 2024. The result revealed that \"ANC,\" \"Africa,\" \"south,\" \"power,\" and \"will\" were the most frequently discussed topics in the discourse of electricity access. Also, more positive-tone comments were recorded than negative-tone remarks within the period. In terms of subjective polarity analysis, comments were positively inclined. The top ten topics that emerged were “ANC”, “Energy”, “People”, “Country”, “Government”, “Electricity”, “Eskom”, “Africa”, “Power” and “South”. The heatmap showed that there were a few topics with high correlation values. For cluster analysis, “South”, “Country”, “Eskom”, “Power” and “Energy” had positive sentiments and contents. On the contrary, “Government”, “Africa” and “People” were topics of negative sentiments and contents. Only “ANC” connected neutral sentiments and content. “ANC”, “Africa” and “country” had an 81.77 % degree of centrality in the public digital discourse on access to electricity in SSA countries. This study has important ramifications for SSA, an energy-poor region towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 107472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104061902500017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In view of the lagging position of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) compared to other regional blocs in accessing electricity coupled with the wide disparity in rural-urban access to electricity, this study adopts the scrapping method to efficiently gather and analyse social discourse in real time. From the YouTube platform, this study examined 887 comments from January 2014 to July 2024. The result revealed that "ANC," "Africa," "south," "power," and "will" were the most frequently discussed topics in the discourse of electricity access. Also, more positive-tone comments were recorded than negative-tone remarks within the period. In terms of subjective polarity analysis, comments were positively inclined. The top ten topics that emerged were “ANC”, “Energy”, “People”, “Country”, “Government”, “Electricity”, “Eskom”, “Africa”, “Power” and “South”. The heatmap showed that there were a few topics with high correlation values. For cluster analysis, “South”, “Country”, “Eskom”, “Power” and “Energy” had positive sentiments and contents. On the contrary, “Government”, “Africa” and “People” were topics of negative sentiments and contents. Only “ANC” connected neutral sentiments and content. “ANC”, “Africa” and “country” had an 81.77 % degree of centrality in the public digital discourse on access to electricity in SSA countries. This study has important ramifications for SSA, an energy-poor region towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7.
从屏幕到电网:撒哈拉以南非洲地区电力接入的网络报废分析
鉴于撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)在电力获取方面相对于其他区域集团的滞后地位,以及城乡电力获取的巨大差距,本研究采用了scrapingmethod对社会话语进行实时高效的收集和分析。从2014年1月到2024年7月,这项研究调查了YouTube平台上的887条评论。结果显示,“ANC”、“非洲”、“南方”、“权力”和“意志”是电力接入话语中最常讨论的话题。此外,在这段时间内,积极语气的评论比消极语气的评论更多。在主观极性分析方面,评论倾向于积极。出现的前十大话题是“非国大”、“能源”、“人民”、“国家”、“政府”、“电力”、“Eskom”、“非洲”、“电力”和“南方”。热图显示,有几个话题具有高相关值。聚类分析中,“South”、“Country”、“Eskom”、“Power”和“Energy”具有积极的情绪和内容。相反,“政府”、“非洲”和“人民”是负面情绪和内容的话题。只有“ANC”把中立的情绪和内容联系起来。“ANC”、“非洲”和“国家”在SSA国家关于电力获取的公共数字话语中的中心度为81.77 %。该研究对能源匮乏地区SSA实现可持续发展目标(SDG) 7具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信