Vera Voorwinde , Ingrid H.M. Steenhuis , Ignace M.C. Janssen , Valerie M. Monpellier , Maartje M. van Stralen
{"title":"Getting back on track: Development of a blended-care intervention for weight recurrence after metabolic bariatric surgery using intervention mapping","authors":"Vera Voorwinde , Ingrid H.M. Steenhuis , Ignace M.C. Janssen , Valerie M. Monpellier , Maartje M. van Stralen","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically re-develop a blended-care intervention addressing weight recurrence after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Weight recurrence poses a significant longterm challenge for around 20–30 % of MBS patients. The intervention aims to improve weight outcomes and enhance patient well-being. This study describes the novel application of the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol, integrating scientific evidence and stakeholder input.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The six-step IM protocol guided the development process, ensuring the active involvement of patients and healthcare professionals. A comprehensive needs assessment using quantitative, qualitative, and literature-based approaches informed the creation of a logic model of the problem (Step 1) and a logic model of change (Step 2). Program outcomes and objectives were formulated through collaborative brainstorming and design-thinking sessions, leading to intervention design (Step 3). The intervention was co-produced with patients, implementers, and an app developer (Step 4). Detailed implementation (Step 5) and evaluation (Step 6) plans were subsequently developed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The IM process yielded a blended-care intervention grounded in theoretical frameworks and evidence-based methods. The intervention actively involved the target population and implementers, addressing key determinants of weight recurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The IM protocol demonstrated utility in designing a tailored, theory-based intervention post-MBS. The process emphasized the value of integrating stakeholder perspectives and highlighted the feasibility of co-creating an evidence-informed intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>This intervention incorporates newly developed elements in a novel blended-care structure. Future evaluation is necessary to determine its effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To systematically re-develop a blended-care intervention addressing weight recurrence after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Weight recurrence poses a significant longterm challenge for around 20–30 % of MBS patients. The intervention aims to improve weight outcomes and enhance patient well-being. This study describes the novel application of the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol, integrating scientific evidence and stakeholder input.
Methods
The six-step IM protocol guided the development process, ensuring the active involvement of patients and healthcare professionals. A comprehensive needs assessment using quantitative, qualitative, and literature-based approaches informed the creation of a logic model of the problem (Step 1) and a logic model of change (Step 2). Program outcomes and objectives were formulated through collaborative brainstorming and design-thinking sessions, leading to intervention design (Step 3). The intervention was co-produced with patients, implementers, and an app developer (Step 4). Detailed implementation (Step 5) and evaluation (Step 6) plans were subsequently developed.
Results
The IM process yielded a blended-care intervention grounded in theoretical frameworks and evidence-based methods. The intervention actively involved the target population and implementers, addressing key determinants of weight recurrence.
Conclusion
The IM protocol demonstrated utility in designing a tailored, theory-based intervention post-MBS. The process emphasized the value of integrating stakeholder perspectives and highlighted the feasibility of co-creating an evidence-informed intervention.
Innovation
This intervention incorporates newly developed elements in a novel blended-care structure. Future evaluation is necessary to determine its effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes.