Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on the risk of major adverse limb events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Fernando Garagoli , Walter Masson , Leandro Barbagelata , Martín Lobo
{"title":"Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on the risk of major adverse limb events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Fernando Garagoli , Walter Masson , Leandro Barbagelata , Martín Lobo","doi":"10.1016/j.endien.2025.501562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on the risk of major adverse limb events (MALE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of GLP-1RAs therapy on peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The random-effects model was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 6 randomized clinical trials were considered eligible for this systematic review. On the other hand, 4 clinical trials were included for the meta-analysis. A total of 15,427 subjects were allocated to the GLP-1RAs group, and 15,476 to the placebo group. Overall, this meta-analysis showed that the use of GLP-1RAs is associated with a lower risk of PAD-related events (OR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.62–0.98, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->39%) vs the placebo group. The analytical evaluation did not suggest publication bias, and the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the result was robust.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of GLP-1RAs is associated with fewer PAD-related clinical events. Of note, despite the clinical significance of PAD, most analyzed studies did not specifically report on these events. Future studies should include PAD as a key endpoint. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024565567.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48650,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion","volume":"72 5","pages":"Article 501562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530018025000587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on the risk of major adverse limb events (MALE).
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of GLP-1RAs therapy on peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The random-effects model was performed.
Results
A total of 6 randomized clinical trials were considered eligible for this systematic review. On the other hand, 4 clinical trials were included for the meta-analysis. A total of 15,427 subjects were allocated to the GLP-1RAs group, and 15,476 to the placebo group. Overall, this meta-analysis showed that the use of GLP-1RAs is associated with a lower risk of PAD-related events (OR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.62–0.98, I2 = 39%) vs the placebo group. The analytical evaluation did not suggest publication bias, and the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the result was robust.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of GLP-1RAs is associated with fewer PAD-related clinical events. Of note, despite the clinical significance of PAD, most analyzed studies did not specifically report on these events. Future studies should include PAD as a key endpoint. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024565567.
期刊介绍:
Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Diabetes (Sociedad Española de Diabetes, SED), and was founded in 1954.
The aim of the journal is to improve knowledge and be a useful tool in practice for clinical and laboratory specialists, trainee physicians, researchers, and nurses interested in endocrinology, diabetes, nutrition and related disciplines.
It is an international journal published in Spanish (print and online) and English (online), covering different fields of endocrinology and metabolism, including diabetes, obesity, and nutrition disorders, as well as the most relevant research produced mainly in Spanish language territories.
The quality of the contents is ensured by a prestigious national and international board, and by a selected panel of specialists involved in a rigorous peer review. The result is that only manuscripts containing high quality research and with utmost interest for clinicians and professionals related in the field are published.
The Journal publishes Original clinical and research articles, Reviews, Special articles, Clinical Guidelines, Position Statements from both societies and Letters to the editor.
Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición can be found at Science Citation Index Expanded, Medline/PubMed and SCOPUS.