Development and feasibility testing of an implementation evaluation tool: Recommendations from the managing epilepsy well (MEW) network research collaborative
Martha Sajatovic , Ross Shegog , Elaine Kiriakopoulos , Clara Adeniyi , Jessie Black , Barbara C. Jobst , Erica K. Johnson , Robin McGee , Tanya M. Spruill , Cam Escoffery
{"title":"Development and feasibility testing of an implementation evaluation tool: Recommendations from the managing epilepsy well (MEW) network research collaborative","authors":"Martha Sajatovic , Ross Shegog , Elaine Kiriakopoulos , Clara Adeniyi , Jessie Black , Barbara C. Jobst , Erica K. Johnson , Robin McGee , Tanya M. Spruill , Cam Escoffery","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network has led the development, testing and scale-up of epilepsy self-management (ESM). The MEW Integrated Database (MEW DB) is a pooled repository of archival studies that facilitates aggregate analysis. This report describes an implementation evaluation tool for ESM adopters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Publicly available materials on program implementation, adoption and sustainability as well as readiness surveys used by the MEW Network were reviewed, as were content domains and format styles relevant to ESM implementation. Requirements for data Tiers included: 1) survey Tier should be short (≤6 items) and completed quickly (< 3 min), 2) question and response format should be consistent, 3) data elements are relevant to ESM adopters and 4) the tool should be applicable across ESM programs. Iterative review, discussion and item-ranking yielded a final set of 3 distinct data element Tiers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Implementation data elements assess the characteristics of organization that may be a potential ESM adopter (Tier 1), organizational readiness to ESM implementation (Tier 2) and perceptions of ESM program effects or impact by adopters at the individual and program levels (Tier 3). There are 18 data elements, 6 elements in each Tier. Organizational characteristics reflect health disparities among people with epilepsy and common comorbidities. Implementation readiness barriers include motivational factors, training and resources. Implementation experience/outcomes include perceived ESM duration, credibility, impact, likability and effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A brief and practical implementation evaluation tool for ESM has potential value and important clinical and policy implications in advancing care for people with epilepsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 110488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025002276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
The Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network has led the development, testing and scale-up of epilepsy self-management (ESM). The MEW Integrated Database (MEW DB) is a pooled repository of archival studies that facilitates aggregate analysis. This report describes an implementation evaluation tool for ESM adopters.
Methods
Publicly available materials on program implementation, adoption and sustainability as well as readiness surveys used by the MEW Network were reviewed, as were content domains and format styles relevant to ESM implementation. Requirements for data Tiers included: 1) survey Tier should be short (≤6 items) and completed quickly (< 3 min), 2) question and response format should be consistent, 3) data elements are relevant to ESM adopters and 4) the tool should be applicable across ESM programs. Iterative review, discussion and item-ranking yielded a final set of 3 distinct data element Tiers.
Results
Implementation data elements assess the characteristics of organization that may be a potential ESM adopter (Tier 1), organizational readiness to ESM implementation (Tier 2) and perceptions of ESM program effects or impact by adopters at the individual and program levels (Tier 3). There are 18 data elements, 6 elements in each Tier. Organizational characteristics reflect health disparities among people with epilepsy and common comorbidities. Implementation readiness barriers include motivational factors, training and resources. Implementation experience/outcomes include perceived ESM duration, credibility, impact, likability and effectiveness.
Conclusions
A brief and practical implementation evaluation tool for ESM has potential value and important clinical and policy implications in advancing care for people with epilepsy.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.