Urbanization’s Role in shrinking greenness Gradients: Core area vegetation Growth and convergence of Rural-Urban Green coverage in 766 Chinese cities using seven indicators

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Qikang Zhong, Zhe Li
{"title":"Urbanization’s Role in shrinking greenness Gradients: Core area vegetation Growth and convergence of Rural-Urban Green coverage in 766 Chinese cities using seven indicators","authors":"Qikang Zhong,&nbsp;Zhe Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urbanization significantly alters vegetation greenness, yet the spatial and temporal dynamics of this change, especially in core urban areas versus rural zones, remain underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of urbanization on vegetation greenness across 766 cities in China from 2000 to 2022, using seven distinct indicators, including three newly proposed ones. Satellite-based vegetation indices, Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), are used to quantify shifts in vegetation coverage, focusing on the greenness gradients from urban cores to rural areas. The results reveal a shrinking greenness gradient due to urbanization, with significant increases in vegetation coverage in urban core areas. Specifically, ΔVI (urban VI minus rural VI) decreased by 9.6 % (p &lt; 0.05), indicating a convergence of vegetation greenness between urban and rural areas. Meanwhile, the proportion of urban VI relative to rural VI (PVI) showed no significant trend across cities (p &gt; 0.05), but exhibited a notable increase of 15.3 % in urban core areas, suggesting a positive urbanization impact on greenness in these regions. Spatial trends showed that 73.5 % of urban areas exhibited increasing EVI values, compared to 90.6 % in rural areas. The percentage increase in EVI during the study period was 34.0 % in urban core areas, compared to 20.9 % in urban areas and 21.4 % in rural zones. This study’s novel use of seven distinct indicators offers a comprehensive evaluation of urbanization’s impact on vegetation greenness, providing valuable insights for sustainable urban planning and environmental management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 113628"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urbanization significantly alters vegetation greenness, yet the spatial and temporal dynamics of this change, especially in core urban areas versus rural zones, remain underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of urbanization on vegetation greenness across 766 cities in China from 2000 to 2022, using seven distinct indicators, including three newly proposed ones. Satellite-based vegetation indices, Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), are used to quantify shifts in vegetation coverage, focusing on the greenness gradients from urban cores to rural areas. The results reveal a shrinking greenness gradient due to urbanization, with significant increases in vegetation coverage in urban core areas. Specifically, ΔVI (urban VI minus rural VI) decreased by 9.6 % (p < 0.05), indicating a convergence of vegetation greenness between urban and rural areas. Meanwhile, the proportion of urban VI relative to rural VI (PVI) showed no significant trend across cities (p > 0.05), but exhibited a notable increase of 15.3 % in urban core areas, suggesting a positive urbanization impact on greenness in these regions. Spatial trends showed that 73.5 % of urban areas exhibited increasing EVI values, compared to 90.6 % in rural areas. The percentage increase in EVI during the study period was 34.0 % in urban core areas, compared to 20.9 % in urban areas and 21.4 % in rural zones. This study’s novel use of seven distinct indicators offers a comprehensive evaluation of urbanization’s impact on vegetation greenness, providing valuable insights for sustainable urban planning and environmental management.
城市化对绿度梯度收缩的作用:基于7个指标的中国766个城市核心区植被生长与城乡绿化覆盖趋同
城市化显著改变了植被的绿化率,但这种变化的时空动态,特别是在核心城市地区与农村地区,仍未得到充分探索。本研究利用7个不同的指标,包括3个新提出的指标,评估了2000年至2022年中国766个城市城市化对植被绿化率的影响。基于卫星的植被指数增强植被指数(Enhanced vegetation Index, EVI)和归一化植被指数(Normalized Difference vegetation Index, NDVI)用于量化植被覆盖度的变化,重点关注从城市核心到农村地区的绿化梯度。结果表明,城市化导致城市绿化梯度减小,城市核心区植被覆盖度显著增加。具体来说,ΔVI(城市VI减去农村VI)下降了9.6% (p <;0.05),表明城乡植被绿化率趋同。与此同时,城市VI相对于农村VI的比例(PVI)在城市之间没有明显的趋势(p >;0.05),但在城市核心区表现出15.3%的显著增长,表明城市化对这些区域的绿化产生了积极的影响。73.5%的城市地区EVI值呈上升趋势,农村地区EVI值为90.6%。在研究期间,城市核心区EVI的增长百分比为34.0%,而城市地区为20.9%,农村地区为21.4%。本研究新颖地使用了七个不同的指标,全面评估了城市化对植被绿化率的影响,为可持续城市规划和环境管理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信