Anticoagulant rodenticides in mesocarnivores around the world: A review

IF 9 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
David Fernández-Casado, Javier García-Muñoz, Ángel Portillo-Moreno, Salomé Martínez-Morcillo, María Prado Míguez-Santiyán, Marcos Pérez-López, Francisco Soler-Rodríguez
{"title":"Anticoagulant rodenticides in mesocarnivores around the world: A review","authors":"David Fernández-Casado,&nbsp;Javier García-Muñoz,&nbsp;Ángel Portillo-Moreno,&nbsp;Salomé Martínez-Morcillo,&nbsp;María Prado Míguez-Santiyán,&nbsp;Marcos Pérez-López,&nbsp;Francisco Soler-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.enceco.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) have been the main tool to control rodent pests since the 1950s; however, they can affect “non-target” species causing serious environmental problems, such as secondary poisonings in wildlife by an indirect route of exposure. Mesocarnivores are the second group of wild animals most affected by ARs poisoning, only preceded by raptors, with dire incidence values in the literature: 63.78% of the studied animals were exposed to ARs. This exposure is mainly due to life history traits, such as diet (increasingly based on rodents and micromammals), ethology (opportunistic animals, scavenging), and adaptations to the anthropized environment. In this review, we have compiled data from over 40 studies from 17 countries from the 1990s to the present. A total of 11 different ARs were analyzed. Brodifacoum had the highest detection incidence (56.31%). In some cases, several ARs were detected in the same animal. Secondary intoxication (from food based on ARs target species or their carcasses) is the main type of AR intoxication in mesocarnivores. Among the most affected species are the fox (<em>Vulpes vulpes</em>) (Europe) and the fisher (<em>Pekania pennanti</em>) (an endangered mustelid in the USA). In most cases, the AR concentrations in the liver exceeded the diagnostic threshold (100–200 ng/g wet weight), although sublethal exposure was also a problem. The impact of ARs on mesocarnivore populations is unknown, mainly because of the lack of specific studies which usually focus on other species that are of “greater interest” because of biological, economic, or social reasons. In addition, there is a lack of research on the toxic effects of sublethal exposure to ARs, which may contribute to the death of predators. More exhaustive analysis and study of the real implications of ARs on the world's mesocarnivores and the application of mechanisms to mitigate exposure, as well as the search for new alternatives for pest control, are therefore needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100480,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 966-979"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259018262500058X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) have been the main tool to control rodent pests since the 1950s; however, they can affect “non-target” species causing serious environmental problems, such as secondary poisonings in wildlife by an indirect route of exposure. Mesocarnivores are the second group of wild animals most affected by ARs poisoning, only preceded by raptors, with dire incidence values in the literature: 63.78% of the studied animals were exposed to ARs. This exposure is mainly due to life history traits, such as diet (increasingly based on rodents and micromammals), ethology (opportunistic animals, scavenging), and adaptations to the anthropized environment. In this review, we have compiled data from over 40 studies from 17 countries from the 1990s to the present. A total of 11 different ARs were analyzed. Brodifacoum had the highest detection incidence (56.31%). In some cases, several ARs were detected in the same animal. Secondary intoxication (from food based on ARs target species or their carcasses) is the main type of AR intoxication in mesocarnivores. Among the most affected species are the fox (Vulpes vulpes) (Europe) and the fisher (Pekania pennanti) (an endangered mustelid in the USA). In most cases, the AR concentrations in the liver exceeded the diagnostic threshold (100–200 ng/g wet weight), although sublethal exposure was also a problem. The impact of ARs on mesocarnivore populations is unknown, mainly because of the lack of specific studies which usually focus on other species that are of “greater interest” because of biological, economic, or social reasons. In addition, there is a lack of research on the toxic effects of sublethal exposure to ARs, which may contribute to the death of predators. More exhaustive analysis and study of the real implications of ARs on the world's mesocarnivores and the application of mechanisms to mitigate exposure, as well as the search for new alternatives for pest control, are therefore needed.
世界中食性动物抗凝血灭鼠剂研究进展
自20世纪50年代以来,抗凝血灭鼠剂(ARs)一直是防治鼠害的主要工具;然而,它们可以影响“非目标”物种,造成严重的环境问题,例如通过间接接触途径对野生动物造成二次中毒。中食性动物是受ARs中毒影响最严重的第二种野生动物,仅次于迅猛龙,在文献中具有可怕的发生率值:63.78%的研究动物暴露于ARs。这种暴露主要是由于生活史特征,如饮食(越来越多地以啮齿动物和微型哺乳动物为基础)、行为学(机会主义动物、食腐动物)和对人类化环境的适应。在这篇综述中,我们收集了从20世纪90年代至今来自17个国家的40多项研究的数据。共分析了11种不同的ar。Brodifacoum的检出率最高,为56.31%。在某些情况下,在同一动物中检测到几种ar。继发性中毒(来自以AR靶物种或其尸体为基础的食物)是中食肉动物AR中毒的主要类型。其中最受影响的物种是狐狸(Vulpes Vulpes)(欧洲)和鱼(Pekania pennanti)(美国的一种濒临灭绝的鼬)。在大多数情况下,肝脏中的AR浓度超过诊断阈值(100-200 ng/g湿重),尽管亚致死暴露也是一个问题。ar对中食肉动物种群的影响尚不清楚,主要是因为缺乏具体的研究,这些研究通常集中在由于生物、经济或社会原因而“更感兴趣”的其他物种上。此外,对亚致死暴露于ar的毒性作用缺乏研究,这可能导致捕食者死亡。因此,需要更详尽地分析和研究ARs对世界中食肉动物的实际影响,并应用减轻接触的机制,以及寻找新的虫害防治替代办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信