Syed Awais Ali*, Syed Nasir Shah, Malik Abdul Karim, Syed Abdul Moiz Hashmi, Farooq Ahmad, Khairul Habib, Abdul Sami and Muhammad Abdullah,
{"title":"State-of-the-Art Membrane Solutions for Direct Air Carbon Capture (DACC): An Overview on the Current Status and Future Directions","authors":"Syed Awais Ali*, Syed Nasir Shah, Malik Abdul Karim, Syed Abdul Moiz Hashmi, Farooq Ahmad, Khairul Habib, Abdul Sami and Muhammad Abdullah, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c0079310.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Most efforts for carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emission reduction are focused on sequestering CO<sub>2</sub> from large point sources such as power plants and the process industries. However, a quarter of global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (nearly 8 billion tons) emanate from small-point sources such as agriculture, waste management, domestic sector, and land use. These sources are distributed over vast areas and individually so small that conventional capture processes cannot filter the CO<sub>2</sub> out, yet they still require active decarbonization. A solution to this problem is to pull CO<sub>2</sub> directly from the free air. The UK Parliament’s climate change committee suggests that direct air carbon capture (DACC) could remove 1 billion tons of CO<sub>2</sub> globally. The same report raises concerns over the inflated costs of CO<sub>2</sub> removal associated with DACC (£250–400/ton of CO<sub>2</sub>). Indeed, the highly diluted concentration of CO<sub>2</sub> in air (0.04%) imposes a high energy penalty and increases processing costs. The current state-of-the-art DACC involves an adsorption process that uses an amine adsorbent to remove CO<sub>2</sub> from the air. The literature review reveals very few investigations reported on membranes for DACC until recently. Theoretically, membrane-based CO<sub>2</sub> removal presents several advantages over conventional sorbent methods, including higher energy efficiency and lower operational costs. This Review summarizes recent advancements in membrane-based CO<sub>2</sub> capture, focusing on innovations in structure and materials for improved direct air carbon capture (m-DACC). In addition, it systematically links membrane performance metrics with economic feasibility and scalability, providing a comparative framework for assessing industrial potential. Furthermore, it explores emerging trends in m-DACC applications, identifying key process optimizations and challenges that influence large-scale deployment. By synthesizing recent breakthroughs, this Review serves as a comprehensive guide for researchers and industry stakeholders seeking to advance the field of m-DACC.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 20","pages":"9285–9315 9285–9315"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most efforts for carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction are focused on sequestering CO2 from large point sources such as power plants and the process industries. However, a quarter of global CO2 emissions (nearly 8 billion tons) emanate from small-point sources such as agriculture, waste management, domestic sector, and land use. These sources are distributed over vast areas and individually so small that conventional capture processes cannot filter the CO2 out, yet they still require active decarbonization. A solution to this problem is to pull CO2 directly from the free air. The UK Parliament’s climate change committee suggests that direct air carbon capture (DACC) could remove 1 billion tons of CO2 globally. The same report raises concerns over the inflated costs of CO2 removal associated with DACC (£250–400/ton of CO2). Indeed, the highly diluted concentration of CO2 in air (0.04%) imposes a high energy penalty and increases processing costs. The current state-of-the-art DACC involves an adsorption process that uses an amine adsorbent to remove CO2 from the air. The literature review reveals very few investigations reported on membranes for DACC until recently. Theoretically, membrane-based CO2 removal presents several advantages over conventional sorbent methods, including higher energy efficiency and lower operational costs. This Review summarizes recent advancements in membrane-based CO2 capture, focusing on innovations in structure and materials for improved direct air carbon capture (m-DACC). In addition, it systematically links membrane performance metrics with economic feasibility and scalability, providing a comparative framework for assessing industrial potential. Furthermore, it explores emerging trends in m-DACC applications, identifying key process optimizations and challenges that influence large-scale deployment. By synthesizing recent breakthroughs, this Review serves as a comprehensive guide for researchers and industry stakeholders seeking to advance the field of m-DACC.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.