294 Award Talk: Longitudinal assessment of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Salmonella enterica concentration and prevalence in relation to feedlot cattle health and management

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Colten W Dornbach
{"title":"294 Award Talk: Longitudinal assessment of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Salmonella enterica concentration and prevalence in relation to feedlot cattle health and management","authors":"Colten W Dornbach","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf102.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our objective was to longitudinally assess the prevalence of Fusobacterium and Salmonella in relation to feedlot cattle health and management. In Exp. 1, crossbred steers (n = 227; BW = 353 ± 39.6 kg) were transported to a research feedlot and fed a high-concentrate diet. Nasal, ruminal fluid, and fecal samples were aseptically collected following feedlot arrival (d 5), 1 wk after adaptation to a finishing diet (d 35), and the day before harvest (study end). Livers were collected at harvest, and cattle were assigned into either control or liver abscess (LA) groups based on liver abscess prevalence. Overall LA prevalence was 18.7%. The concentration and prevalence of Salmonella decreased in ruminal fluid and increased in feces with days on feed (P < 0.01). Conversely, ruminal fluid prevalence of F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum and F. varium increased with days on feed (P < 0.01). Fusobacterium abundance in ruminal fluid and feces was not indicative of LA development, except for F. varium being more abundant (P < 0.01) in the ruminal fluid of steers with LA. Abundance of subsp. necrophorum was greater in abscessed liver tissue than in healthy tissue (P = 0.03), but no other differences in bacterial abundance or prevalence were observed in livers. These data suggest Fusobacterium and Salmonella were prevalent throughout the gastrointestinal tract and affected by days on feed, but their prevalence and abundance were generally not indicative of LA formation. In Exp. 2, crossbred beef steers (n = 232; BW = 213 kg ± 6.3 kg) from 2 sources were used in a generalized complete block design. Experimental treatments and steers were randomly assigned to pen within source block. Treatments included a negative control (s.c. injection with sterile saline; 0M); metaphylaxis with tulathromycin applied at random to 33 or 66% of steers (33M and 66M), respectively; and conventional metaphylaxis applied to 100% of the steers (100M; positive control). Body weights, whole blood samples, and fecal samples were collected on d 0, 14, and 35. The percentage of steers treated for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) once was 108% and 62% greater on average for 0M and 33M, respectively, than for 66M and 100M steers (P = 0.01). Growth performance from d 0 to 35 did not differ among treatments (P ≥ 0.63). Eosinophil percentage was greatest for 100M and least for 0M and 66M (P = 0.01), while day affected most complete blood cell count variables (P < 0.01). Fecal Salmonella concentrations and prevalence (P ≥ 0.40) did not differ among treatments but increased from d 0 to 14 (P < 0.01). These data suggest that metaphylaxis can be administered to 66% of high-risk beef steers without increasing BRD morbidity, total antimicrobial use, or pathogen shedding.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective was to longitudinally assess the prevalence of Fusobacterium and Salmonella in relation to feedlot cattle health and management. In Exp. 1, crossbred steers (n = 227; BW = 353 ± 39.6 kg) were transported to a research feedlot and fed a high-concentrate diet. Nasal, ruminal fluid, and fecal samples were aseptically collected following feedlot arrival (d 5), 1 wk after adaptation to a finishing diet (d 35), and the day before harvest (study end). Livers were collected at harvest, and cattle were assigned into either control or liver abscess (LA) groups based on liver abscess prevalence. Overall LA prevalence was 18.7%. The concentration and prevalence of Salmonella decreased in ruminal fluid and increased in feces with days on feed (P < 0.01). Conversely, ruminal fluid prevalence of F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum and F. varium increased with days on feed (P < 0.01). Fusobacterium abundance in ruminal fluid and feces was not indicative of LA development, except for F. varium being more abundant (P < 0.01) in the ruminal fluid of steers with LA. Abundance of subsp. necrophorum was greater in abscessed liver tissue than in healthy tissue (P = 0.03), but no other differences in bacterial abundance or prevalence were observed in livers. These data suggest Fusobacterium and Salmonella were prevalent throughout the gastrointestinal tract and affected by days on feed, but their prevalence and abundance were generally not indicative of LA formation. In Exp. 2, crossbred beef steers (n = 232; BW = 213 kg ± 6.3 kg) from 2 sources were used in a generalized complete block design. Experimental treatments and steers were randomly assigned to pen within source block. Treatments included a negative control (s.c. injection with sterile saline; 0M); metaphylaxis with tulathromycin applied at random to 33 or 66% of steers (33M and 66M), respectively; and conventional metaphylaxis applied to 100% of the steers (100M; positive control). Body weights, whole blood samples, and fecal samples were collected on d 0, 14, and 35. The percentage of steers treated for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) once was 108% and 62% greater on average for 0M and 33M, respectively, than for 66M and 100M steers (P = 0.01). Growth performance from d 0 to 35 did not differ among treatments (P ≥ 0.63). Eosinophil percentage was greatest for 100M and least for 0M and 66M (P = 0.01), while day affected most complete blood cell count variables (P < 0.01). Fecal Salmonella concentrations and prevalence (P ≥ 0.40) did not differ among treatments but increased from d 0 to 14 (P < 0.01). These data suggest that metaphylaxis can be administered to 66% of high-risk beef steers without increasing BRD morbidity, total antimicrobial use, or pathogen shedding.
294获奖演讲:与饲养场牛健康和管理相关的necrophorum和沙门氏菌浓度和流行度的纵向评估
我们的目的是纵向评估与饲养场牛的健康和管理有关的梭杆菌和沙门氏菌的流行。在实验1中,杂交阉牛(n = 227;体重= 353±39.6 kg),运至研究饲养场,饲喂高精料日粮。在到达饲养场后(第5天)、适应育肥期饲粮后1周(第35天)和收获前一天(研究结束)无菌采集鼻、瘤胃液和粪便样本。收获时采集肝脏,根据肝脏脓肿的发生率将牛分为对照组和肝脓肿组。总体LA患病率为18.7%。随着饲喂天数的增加,瘤胃液中沙门氏菌的浓度和流行率下降,粪便中沙门氏菌的浓度和流行率上升(P <;0.01)。相反,瘤胃液中坏死乳杆菌亚种的患病率。necrophorum和F. varum随着饲喂天数的增加而增加(P <;0.01)。瘤胃液和粪便中梭杆菌的丰度不代表LA的发展,除了F. varium更丰富(P <;0.01)。丰富的subsp。坏死菌在脓肿肝组织中比在健康组织中更大(P = 0.03),但在肝脏中没有观察到细菌丰度或患病率的其他差异。这些数据表明,梭杆菌和沙门氏菌在整个胃肠道中普遍存在,并受到饲料喂养天数的影响,但它们的患病率和丰度通常并不表明LA的形成。在实验2中,杂交肉牛(n = 232;体重= 213 kg±6.3 kg),采用广义完全块设计。实验组和对照组随机分配到源区。治疗包括阴性对照(s.c.注射无菌生理盐水;0米);随机应用图拉霉素对33或66%的受试者(33和66)进行过敏反应;常规过敏反应应用于100%的受试者(100M;积极的控制)。于第0、14和35天采集体重、全血和粪便样本。牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)治疗1次的比例,0米和33米的牛平均比66米和100米的牛高108%和62% (P = 0.01)。第0 ~ 35 d各处理间生长性能无显著差异(P≥0.63)。100M时嗜酸性粒细胞百分比最高,0M和66M时最低(P = 0.01),而日数对全血细胞计数变量影响最大(P <;0.01)。粪便沙门氏菌浓度和患病率(P≥0.40)在不同处理间无显著差异,但在第0 ~ 14天呈上升趋势(P <;0.01)。这些数据表明,66%的高风险肉牛可采用过敏反应,而不会增加BRD发病率、总抗菌素使用或病原体脱落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信