191 Field validation of mob composite sampling protocol to estimate herd parasitism in cattle

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Ashlee Gibbons, Grant I Crawford, James Slightom, Haley E Larson
{"title":"191 Field validation of mob composite sampling protocol to estimate herd parasitism in cattle","authors":"Ashlee Gibbons, Grant I Crawford, James Slightom, Haley E Larson","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf102.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cattle, when initially placed into the feedlot, frequently carry a significant internal parasite load, that if unaddressed, can result in weight loss, poor growth, and increased susceptibility to illness due to immune suppression. To combat these challenges, many feedlot animal health protocols include administering anthelmintic treatments immediately upon feedlot arrival. The detection of parasite loads and potential resistance to anthelmintic drugs typically involves fecal egg count protocols conducted using trained laboratory methods. However, these tests can be costly and may not be consistently used across operations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of existing fecal sampling protocols against a modified mob composite sampling approach, intending to reduce cost and time required for results while encouraging more frequent sampling in commercial settings. A total of 920 fecal samples were collected from cattle (both calf-fed and yearling) in commercial feedlots across the midwestern United States. The cattle, originating from various sources (n=13), were either being sold at a sale barn or transported to feedlots or stocker units for finishing. Samples were collected from fresh fecal pats on the pen floor shortly after the arrival of the animals, with effective communication among feedlot managers and employees being crucial to ensure sampling occurred prior to anthelmintic treatments. Each sampling set corresponded to a pen of cattle (n=46), with pen sizes varying from 64 to 225 head, depending on the specific commercial operation. From each identified fecal pat, approximately 15 ml of material was collected from three different sites. This homogenized mixture of approximately 45 ml constituted one individual sample (IDV). The process was repeated with 20 distinct, fresh fecal pats within each pen, reflecting the industry-standard sampling protocol. The average of the 20 samples provided an eggs per gram (epg) value indicative of the parasite load within that cattle group (range 0 to 444 epg). For mob samples (n=92), 7.5 ml from ten individual samples were combined. Each pen produced two composite (MOB) samples, which were mixed by stirring in a smooth-sided cup using a tongue depressor. The averaged values from these two MOB samples yielded an epg representing the parasite load for that group. To evaluate the effectiveness of the MOB sampling method in producing values comparable to the IDV industry standard, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was utilized. The analysis revealed a 91.7% agreement in mean fecal egg counts between the MOB and IDV methods, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 86.4% to 95.0%. These results suggest that the two-sample mob approach, utilizing a tongue depressor and smooth sided cup for mixing, may provide an acceptable method for assessing parasite loads in commercial feedlot operations, thus enhancing efficiency and cost-effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cattle, when initially placed into the feedlot, frequently carry a significant internal parasite load, that if unaddressed, can result in weight loss, poor growth, and increased susceptibility to illness due to immune suppression. To combat these challenges, many feedlot animal health protocols include administering anthelmintic treatments immediately upon feedlot arrival. The detection of parasite loads and potential resistance to anthelmintic drugs typically involves fecal egg count protocols conducted using trained laboratory methods. However, these tests can be costly and may not be consistently used across operations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of existing fecal sampling protocols against a modified mob composite sampling approach, intending to reduce cost and time required for results while encouraging more frequent sampling in commercial settings. A total of 920 fecal samples were collected from cattle (both calf-fed and yearling) in commercial feedlots across the midwestern United States. The cattle, originating from various sources (n=13), were either being sold at a sale barn or transported to feedlots or stocker units for finishing. Samples were collected from fresh fecal pats on the pen floor shortly after the arrival of the animals, with effective communication among feedlot managers and employees being crucial to ensure sampling occurred prior to anthelmintic treatments. Each sampling set corresponded to a pen of cattle (n=46), with pen sizes varying from 64 to 225 head, depending on the specific commercial operation. From each identified fecal pat, approximately 15 ml of material was collected from three different sites. This homogenized mixture of approximately 45 ml constituted one individual sample (IDV). The process was repeated with 20 distinct, fresh fecal pats within each pen, reflecting the industry-standard sampling protocol. The average of the 20 samples provided an eggs per gram (epg) value indicative of the parasite load within that cattle group (range 0 to 444 epg). For mob samples (n=92), 7.5 ml from ten individual samples were combined. Each pen produced two composite (MOB) samples, which were mixed by stirring in a smooth-sided cup using a tongue depressor. The averaged values from these two MOB samples yielded an epg representing the parasite load for that group. To evaluate the effectiveness of the MOB sampling method in producing values comparable to the IDV industry standard, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was utilized. The analysis revealed a 91.7% agreement in mean fecal egg counts between the MOB and IDV methods, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 86.4% to 95.0%. These results suggest that the two-sample mob approach, utilizing a tongue depressor and smooth sided cup for mixing, may provide an acceptable method for assessing parasite loads in commercial feedlot operations, thus enhancing efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
191 .群体复合抽样方案在估算牛群寄生虫病中的现场验证
牛最初进入饲养场时,经常携带大量的内部寄生虫负荷,如果不加以处理,可能导致体重减轻、生长不良,并由于免疫抑制而增加对疾病的易感性。为了应对这些挑战,许多饲养场的动物卫生协议包括在饲养场到达后立即进行驱虫治疗。寄生虫负荷和对驱虫药潜在耐药性的检测通常涉及使用训练有素的实验室方法进行的粪卵计数方案。但是,这些测试的成本可能很高,并且可能无法在各个操作中一致地使用。本研究旨在评估现有粪便采样方案与改进的群体复合采样方法的有效性,旨在降低结果所需的成本和时间,同时鼓励在商业环境中更频繁地采样。在美国中西部的商业饲养场共收集了920个粪便样本(包括小牛和一岁的牛)。这些牛来自不同的来源(n=13),要么在销售畜棚出售,要么被运送到饲养场或储存单位进行整理。在动物到达后不久,从围栏地板上的新鲜粪便中收集样本,饲养场管理人员和员工之间的有效沟通对于确保在驱虫治疗之前进行采样至关重要。每个采样集对应一个牛圈(n=46),根据具体的商业操作,猪圈大小从64头到225头不等。从每个确定的粪便中,从三个不同的地点收集了大约15毫升的物质。此均质混合物约45毫升构成一个单独的样本(IDV)。这一过程在每个猪圈中重复了20个不同的新鲜粪便,反映了行业标准的采样方案。20个样本的平均值提供了一个每克卵(epg)值,表明该牛群的寄生虫负荷(范围0至444 epg)。对于群体样本(n=92),从10个个体样本中合并7.5 ml。每支笔产生两种复合(MOB)样品,用压舌器在光滑的杯子里搅拌混合。这两个MOB样本的平均值产生了代表该组寄生虫负荷的epg。为了评价MOB抽样方法在产生与IDV行业标准相当的值方面的有效性,使用了Lin的一致性相关系数。分析显示,MOB法和IDV法的平均粪卵数有91.7%的一致性,95%可信区间为86.4% ~ 95.0%。这些结果表明,利用压舌器和光滑侧杯混合的双样本群体方法可能为商业饲养场的寄生虫负荷评估提供一种可接受的方法,从而提高效率和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信