176 Comparing the efficacy of different organic zinc sources on growth performance of broiler chickens

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Luiz Albino, Horacio Rostagno, Raquel Pereira, Maria A Rodriguez Quiros, Elise Nacer Khodja
{"title":"176 Comparing the efficacy of different organic zinc sources on growth performance of broiler chickens","authors":"Luiz Albino, Horacio Rostagno, Raquel Pereira, Maria A Rodriguez Quiros, Elise Nacer Khodja","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf102.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic minerals are those bonded to one or more carbon-containing molecules to increase their bioavailability. Most common ligands are proteinates, amino acids and small peptides. Not all organic minerals are equivalent, their quality depending on strength and stability of the bond with the ligand, but also on the type of ligand as it’s defining its absorption pathway and efficiency. This study aimed to compare different organic Zn sources effectiveness on broiler chickens performance. The feeding trial was carried out at the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. A total of 2000 one-day-old male Cobb 500 chicks of 50 g initial body weight were weighed individually and by pen for equal weight distribution and placed into 24 pens. Chickens were assigned to 10 treatments with 10 replicates (20 birds/pen) and raised for 42 days (factorial design 5 x 2; 5 Zn sources vs 2 levels). The nutritional program consisted of 2 diets: 1–21 days and 21-42 days, formulated to meet or exceed the nutritional requirements for broilers according to Rostagno et al., 2017. Treatments differed by the mineral source and by Zn level (40 or 80 mg/kg). Four types of organic Zn were used: Zn Proteinate, Zn Glycine, Zn Methionine, Zn amino acids chelate and one inorganic form, Zn sulfate. Chickens had ad libitum access to water and feed in mash form. Performance parameters were recorded 1-21, 21-42, and 1-42 days by pen. Production efficiency index calculated as follows: PEI= (weight gain x survival) / (age of slaughter in days x FCR) x 100. Statistical analysis performed using PROC GLM of SAS software, by comparing the different Zn sources by Two-way ANOVA, Duncan’s test, p< 0.10. Broiler chickens fed Zn amino acids chelate had most efficient FCR in both 40 and 80mg/kg feed levels, optimized by -2 pts and -5 pts, respectively (Zn 80mg, p=0.0346). Likewise, chickens fed Zn amino acids chelate had higher weight gain and thus higher final weight at 42 days, +42g and +57g, respectively (Zn 80mg, p=0.0936), compared to other sources. Feed intake was similar for all Zn sources except for Zn-Methionine which increased intake (+170g) and higher weight but worse FCR at Zn 40mg/kg level. These results highlight the differences in terms of efficacy of different Zn sources (inorganic and organic) and even within organic sources, variability is observed. It emphasizes the importance of careful evaluations of technical and economic performance for decision-making in animal nutrition strategies.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic minerals are those bonded to one or more carbon-containing molecules to increase their bioavailability. Most common ligands are proteinates, amino acids and small peptides. Not all organic minerals are equivalent, their quality depending on strength and stability of the bond with the ligand, but also on the type of ligand as it’s defining its absorption pathway and efficiency. This study aimed to compare different organic Zn sources effectiveness on broiler chickens performance. The feeding trial was carried out at the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. A total of 2000 one-day-old male Cobb 500 chicks of 50 g initial body weight were weighed individually and by pen for equal weight distribution and placed into 24 pens. Chickens were assigned to 10 treatments with 10 replicates (20 birds/pen) and raised for 42 days (factorial design 5 x 2; 5 Zn sources vs 2 levels). The nutritional program consisted of 2 diets: 1–21 days and 21-42 days, formulated to meet or exceed the nutritional requirements for broilers according to Rostagno et al., 2017. Treatments differed by the mineral source and by Zn level (40 or 80 mg/kg). Four types of organic Zn were used: Zn Proteinate, Zn Glycine, Zn Methionine, Zn amino acids chelate and one inorganic form, Zn sulfate. Chickens had ad libitum access to water and feed in mash form. Performance parameters were recorded 1-21, 21-42, and 1-42 days by pen. Production efficiency index calculated as follows: PEI= (weight gain x survival) / (age of slaughter in days x FCR) x 100. Statistical analysis performed using PROC GLM of SAS software, by comparing the different Zn sources by Two-way ANOVA, Duncan’s test, p< 0.10. Broiler chickens fed Zn amino acids chelate had most efficient FCR in both 40 and 80mg/kg feed levels, optimized by -2 pts and -5 pts, respectively (Zn 80mg, p=0.0346). Likewise, chickens fed Zn amino acids chelate had higher weight gain and thus higher final weight at 42 days, +42g and +57g, respectively (Zn 80mg, p=0.0936), compared to other sources. Feed intake was similar for all Zn sources except for Zn-Methionine which increased intake (+170g) and higher weight but worse FCR at Zn 40mg/kg level. These results highlight the differences in terms of efficacy of different Zn sources (inorganic and organic) and even within organic sources, variability is observed. It emphasizes the importance of careful evaluations of technical and economic performance for decision-making in animal nutrition strategies.
176不同有机锌源对肉鸡生长性能影响的比较
有机矿物质是那些与一个或多个含碳分子结合以增加其生物利用度的物质。最常见的配体是蛋白质、氨基酸和小肽。并非所有的有机矿物质都是相同的,它们的质量取决于与配体结合的强度和稳定性,也取决于配体的类型,因为它决定了它的吸收途径和效率。本研究旨在比较不同有机锌源对肉鸡生产性能的影响。饲养试验在巴西维萨罗沙联邦大学进行。选取初始体重为50 g的1日龄雄性科布500雏鸡2000只,分别称重和按栏称重,均匀分布于24个栏中。试验鸡分为10个处理,每10个重复(20只/栏),饲养42 d(因子设计5 × 2;5个锌源vs 2个水平)。营养方案包括2种日粮:1-21日粮和21-42日粮,根据Rostagno et al., 2017的研究,配方满足或超过肉鸡的营养需求。不同矿源和锌含量(40 mg/kg或80 mg/kg)处理不同。采用了四种有机锌:蛋白质酸锌、甘氨酸锌、蛋氨酸锌、氨基酸螯合锌和一种无机形式硫酸锌。鸡可以自由地获得糊状的水和饲料。以笔法记录1-21、21-42、1-42 d的性能参数。生产效率指数计算公式为:PEI=(增重×存活率)/(屠宰日龄×饲料转化率)× 100。采用SAS软件的PROC GLM进行统计分析,通过双向方差分析、邓肯检验、p&;lt;0.10. 饲粮中氨基酸螯合锌为40和80mg/kg时,肉鸡的饲料效率最高,分别提高了-2和-5个百分点(锌为80mg, p=0.0346)。同样,与其他来源相比,氨基酸螯合锌饲粮的鸡增重更高,42日龄末重分别为+42g和+57g(锌80mg, p=0.0936)。各锌源采食量基本一致,但蛋氨酸锌在40mg/kg水平时采食量增加(+170g),体重增加,饲料效率下降。这些结果突出了不同锌源(无机和有机)在功效方面的差异,甚至在有机来源中,也观察到可变性。它强调了仔细评估技术和经济绩效对动物营养战略决策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信