41 Effect of space allocation on feeding behavior in grow-finish pigs

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Mackenzie Griffin, Jayden Lawrence, Marley M Knowles, Michael Barrowclough, Justin W Rickard
{"title":"41 Effect of space allocation on feeding behavior in grow-finish pigs","authors":"Mackenzie Griffin, Jayden Lawrence, Marley M Knowles, Michael Barrowclough, Justin W Rickard","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf102.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to evaluate the feeding behavior of grow-finish pigs in pens with two different floor space allowances. A total of 159 commercial crossbred barrows (n = 90; 25.87 ± 7.43 kg) and gilts (n = 69; 28.74 ± 4.08 kg) were housed in single gender pens and fed a common diet for approximately 14 weeks. At the start of the trial pigs were randomly assigned to pens providing one of two space allocations: 3.05m2/pig or 2.29m2/pig with 3 replicate pens per treatment. At allotment each pig was tagged in the ear with a unique colored ear tag for individual identification. Feed was delivered in standard 3-hole box feeders and water was delivered via nipple waterers. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the trial. Final body weight averaged 119.15 ± 31.54 kg (barrows) and 122.84 ± 12.55 kg (gilts). Video monitoring of trial pens was accomplished with cameras mounted to the barn ceiling and 12 h recordings were taken during week 1 (first week on trial following a 7 d acclimation period) and week 14 (last week before marketing at 97 d) to evaluate feeding behavior and activity at both the beginning and end of the grow-finish period. Behaviors of interest included activity (walking, standing, moving, drinking), the number of times each pig entered the feeder, total time spent eating and eating type (nibbler vs. gorger). Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design using the MIXED procedure in SAS. In week 1, increased floor space tended to increase the number of times pigs entered the feeder (P = 0.07) and significantly increased (P = 0.008) the total time spent eating by ~14%. However, these trends were not present at week 14. Floor space allocation did not influence eating type or alter activity level (P > 0.05) in either week 1 or week 14. No significant differences in feeding behavior resulted from an interaction between space allocation and gender. In week 1, gender did not influence the number of times pigs entered the feeder. However, barrows spent more time eating than gilts (84 vs. 63 min) (P < 0.0001). At week 14 these differences were not present (P > 0.05). As space allocation in swine production becomes increasingly scrutinized it will be important to evaluate behavior changes in the context of performance. In this study, increasing floor space impacted grow-finish pig feeding behavior early in the finishing period, but those behaviors were not observed at the end of finishing. Future research in this direction will attempt to identify at which point in production those behaviors change.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feeding behavior of grow-finish pigs in pens with two different floor space allowances. A total of 159 commercial crossbred barrows (n = 90; 25.87 ± 7.43 kg) and gilts (n = 69; 28.74 ± 4.08 kg) were housed in single gender pens and fed a common diet for approximately 14 weeks. At the start of the trial pigs were randomly assigned to pens providing one of two space allocations: 3.05m2/pig or 2.29m2/pig with 3 replicate pens per treatment. At allotment each pig was tagged in the ear with a unique colored ear tag for individual identification. Feed was delivered in standard 3-hole box feeders and water was delivered via nipple waterers. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the trial. Final body weight averaged 119.15 ± 31.54 kg (barrows) and 122.84 ± 12.55 kg (gilts). Video monitoring of trial pens was accomplished with cameras mounted to the barn ceiling and 12 h recordings were taken during week 1 (first week on trial following a 7 d acclimation period) and week 14 (last week before marketing at 97 d) to evaluate feeding behavior and activity at both the beginning and end of the grow-finish period. Behaviors of interest included activity (walking, standing, moving, drinking), the number of times each pig entered the feeder, total time spent eating and eating type (nibbler vs. gorger). Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design using the MIXED procedure in SAS. In week 1, increased floor space tended to increase the number of times pigs entered the feeder (P = 0.07) and significantly increased (P = 0.008) the total time spent eating by ~14%. However, these trends were not present at week 14. Floor space allocation did not influence eating type or alter activity level (P > 0.05) in either week 1 or week 14. No significant differences in feeding behavior resulted from an interaction between space allocation and gender. In week 1, gender did not influence the number of times pigs entered the feeder. However, barrows spent more time eating than gilts (84 vs. 63 min) (P < 0.0001). At week 14 these differences were not present (P > 0.05). As space allocation in swine production becomes increasingly scrutinized it will be important to evaluate behavior changes in the context of performance. In this study, increasing floor space impacted grow-finish pig feeding behavior early in the finishing period, but those behaviors were not observed at the end of finishing. Future research in this direction will attempt to identify at which point in production those behaviors change.
空间分配对生长育肥猪摄食行为的影响
本研究的目的是评估生长育肥猪在两种不同占地面积猪圈中的摄食行为。共159头商品型杂交马(n = 90;25.87±7.43 kg)和后备母猪(n = 69;28.74±4.08 kg),饲养于单性别栏内,饲喂普通饲料约14周。在试验开始时,试验猪被随机分配到两种空间分配中的一种:3.05m2/头或2.29m2/头,每个处理3个重复猪圈。分配时,每头猪的耳朵上都有一个独特的彩色耳标,用于个体识别。饲料通过标准的3孔箱式给料器送出,水通过奶嘴喂料器送出。在整个试验过程中,猪可以自由地获得饲料和水。母猪终末体重平均为119.15±31.54 kg(公母猪)和122.84±12.55 kg(后备母猪)。通过安装在牲口棚天花板上的摄像机对试验栏进行视频监控,并在第1周(7 d驯化期后第1周试验)和第14周(97 d上市前最后一周)拍摄12小时录像,以评估生长肥育期开始和结束时的摄食行为和活动。感兴趣的行为包括活动(行走、站立、移动、饮水)、每头猪进入喂食器的次数、进食的总时间和进食类型(啃食与狼吞虎咽)。数据分析采用SAS的MIXED程序,采用完全随机设计。在第1周,增加场地面积会增加猪进入饲料池的次数(P = 0.07),显著增加猪的总进食时间(P = 0.008)约14%。然而,这些趋势在第14周不存在。占地面积分配不影响饮食类型或改变活动水平(P >;0.05)在第1周和第14周。空间分配与性别的交互作用对取食行为无显著影响。在第1周,性别不影响猪进入喂食器的次数。然而,母猪进食的时间比后备母猪长(84分钟对63分钟)(P <;0.0001)。在第14周,这些差异不存在(P >;0.05)。随着养猪生产中的空间分配变得越来越严格,评估性能背景下的行为变化将变得非常重要。在本研究中,增加占地面积对生长育肥猪的饲喂行为在育肥期早期有影响,但在育肥期后期没有影响。在这个方向上的未来研究将试图确定这些行为在生产中的哪个点发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信