Daily Versus BID Nifedipine GITS in Severe Preeclampsia: Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Miranda K Kiefer,Hayley Williams,Oluchi Nwosu,Devra D Doan Mast,Maged M Costantine,Kara M Rood
{"title":"Daily Versus BID Nifedipine GITS in Severe Preeclampsia: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Miranda K Kiefer,Hayley Williams,Oluchi Nwosu,Devra D Doan Mast,Maged M Costantine,Kara M Rood","doi":"10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.24532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nOptimal dosing of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia with severe features is unknown. We assessed whether nifedipine GITS 30 mg BID improved blood pressure control when compared with nifedipine GITS 60 mg daily.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nUnblinded, randomized controlled trial, at a single academic hospital from December 2021 to December 2023. Individuals between 220/7 and 335/7 weeks of gestation diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features were randomized to nifedipine GITS 60 mg QD or 30 mg BID once the decision to increase the total daily dose was made. The primary outcome was the percentage of suboptimal blood pressures on hours 24 to 48 after randomization, defined as the ratio of systolic ≥150 mm Hg and diastolic ≥100 mm Hg blood pressure episodes divided by the total number of blood pressures taken during the collection time period.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe percentage of suboptimal blood pressure from hours 24 to 48 was similar between groups (60 mg daily: 34.2±29.4% versus 30 mg BID: 32.8±34.0%; P=0.87). The need for any emergent antihypertensive treatment during the blood pressure collection period was higher in the 60 mg daily group (46.2% versus 14.8%; P=0.03). Secondary outcomes including gestational age at delivery and number of increases in long-acting antihypertensive regimen were similar.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nNifedipine GITS dosed 60 mg daily and 30 mg BID has similar rates of suboptimal blood pressure in individuals with preeclampsia with severe features. However, there is a reduction in the need for emergent antihypertensive treatment for severe range blood pressures with BID dosing, which would favor its use in this population.","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.24532","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Optimal dosing of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia with severe features is unknown. We assessed whether nifedipine GITS 30 mg BID improved blood pressure control when compared with nifedipine GITS 60 mg daily. METHODS Unblinded, randomized controlled trial, at a single academic hospital from December 2021 to December 2023. Individuals between 220/7 and 335/7 weeks of gestation diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features were randomized to nifedipine GITS 60 mg QD or 30 mg BID once the decision to increase the total daily dose was made. The primary outcome was the percentage of suboptimal blood pressures on hours 24 to 48 after randomization, defined as the ratio of systolic ≥150 mm Hg and diastolic ≥100 mm Hg blood pressure episodes divided by the total number of blood pressures taken during the collection time period. RESULTS The percentage of suboptimal blood pressure from hours 24 to 48 was similar between groups (60 mg daily: 34.2±29.4% versus 30 mg BID: 32.8±34.0%; P=0.87). The need for any emergent antihypertensive treatment during the blood pressure collection period was higher in the 60 mg daily group (46.2% versus 14.8%; P=0.03). Secondary outcomes including gestational age at delivery and number of increases in long-acting antihypertensive regimen were similar. CONCLUSIONS Nifedipine GITS dosed 60 mg daily and 30 mg BID has similar rates of suboptimal blood pressure in individuals with preeclampsia with severe features. However, there is a reduction in the need for emergent antihypertensive treatment for severe range blood pressures with BID dosing, which would favor its use in this population.
每日与BID硝苯地平GITS治疗重度子痫前期:随机对照试验。
背景硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)对妊娠合并严重子痫前期患者的最佳剂量尚不清楚。我们评估了硝苯地平GITS 30 mg BID与硝苯地平GITS 60 mg每日相比是否能改善血压控制。方法于2021年12月至2023年12月在一家学术医院进行双盲、随机对照试验。妊娠220/7至335/7周之间诊断为伴有严重特征的先兆子痫的个体,一旦决定增加总日剂量,则随机分配硝苯地平GITS 60 mg QD或30 mg BID。主要终点是随机分组后24至48小时内亚理想血压的百分比,定义为收缩压≥150 mm Hg和舒张压≥100 mm Hg发作的比率除以收集时间内血压的总次数。结果两组患者24 ~ 48小时血压次优率相似(60 mg daily: 34.2±29.4% vs 30 mg BID: 32.8±34.0%;P = 0.87)。在血压采集期间,每日60mg组对紧急降压治疗的需求更高(46.2% vs 14.8%;P = 0.03)。次要结局包括分娩胎龄和长效降压药方案的增加次数相似。结论在重度子痫前期患者中,每日剂量60mg的硝非地平GITS与每日剂量30mg BID的亚优血压发生率相似。然而,对于严重范围的血压,使用BID剂量的紧急降压治疗的需求有所减少,这有利于在这一人群中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信