Andrew F Ibrahim,Pojsakorn Danpanichkul,Alexander Hayek,Edwin Paul,Annmarie Farag,Masab Mansoor,Charat Thongprayoon,Wisit Cheungpasitporn,Mohamed O Othman
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology Education: DeepSeek Passes the Gastroenterology Board Examination and Outperforms Legacy ChatGPT Models.","authors":"Andrew F Ibrahim,Pojsakorn Danpanichkul,Alexander Hayek,Edwin Paul,Annmarie Farag,Masab Mansoor,Charat Thongprayoon,Wisit Cheungpasitporn,Mohamed O Othman","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nDeepSeek was evaluated in gastroenterology board examination performance against legacy ChatGPT offline models, which previously showed failing performance.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe performances of the DeepSeek base R1 model and search-augmented R1 model were assessed using American College of Gastroenterology self-assessments (455 questions).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nDeepSeek exceeded passing threshold. Search-augmented DeepSeek scored 81.5% across all questions, and the R1 base model scored 77.1%. Both search-augmented and offline DeepSeek models surpassed offline ChatGPT-3 (65.1%) and ChatGPT-4 (62.4%) (p < 0.001).\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nDeepSeek exhibited passing performance on the gastroenterology board examination, but gaps in niche topics and image exclusion limit utility. It may supplement education if validated by specialists.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
DeepSeek was evaluated in gastroenterology board examination performance against legacy ChatGPT offline models, which previously showed failing performance.
METHODS
The performances of the DeepSeek base R1 model and search-augmented R1 model were assessed using American College of Gastroenterology self-assessments (455 questions).
RESULTS
DeepSeek exceeded passing threshold. Search-augmented DeepSeek scored 81.5% across all questions, and the R1 base model scored 77.1%. Both search-augmented and offline DeepSeek models surpassed offline ChatGPT-3 (65.1%) and ChatGPT-4 (62.4%) (p < 0.001).
DISCUSSION
DeepSeek exhibited passing performance on the gastroenterology board examination, but gaps in niche topics and image exclusion limit utility. It may supplement education if validated by specialists.
与传统ChatGPT离线模型相比,在胃肠病学委员会考试中对introtiondeepseek进行了评估,而传统ChatGPT离线模型此前表现不佳。方法采用美国胃肠学会(American College of Gastroenterology)自评(455题)对DeepSeek基础R1模型和搜索增强R1模型进行性能评估。结果深度搜索超过通过阈值。搜索增强的DeepSeek在所有问题中得分为81.5%,R1基本模型得分为77.1%。搜索增强和离线DeepSeek模型都超过了离线ChatGPT-3(65.1%)和ChatGPT-4 (62.4%) (p < 0.001)。DISCUSSIONDeepSeek在胃肠病学委员会考试中表现及格,但在利基主题和图像排除方面的差距限制了实用性。如果经过专家验证,它可以补充教育。