Epidemiological data on the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales through weekly rectal swabs in non-critically ill patients undergoing antimicrobial therapy: a short-term surveillance study.

Naruemit Sayabovorn, Naruemon Maknakhon, Naratchaphan Pati, Teerawit Tangkoskul, Anupop Jitmuang
{"title":"Epidemiological data on the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i> through weekly rectal swabs in non-critically ill patients undergoing antimicrobial therapy: a short-term surveillance study.","authors":"Naruemit Sayabovorn, Naruemon Maknakhon, Naratchaphan Pati, Teerawit Tangkoskul, Anupop Jitmuang","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the connection between non-critically ill hospitalized patients and the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i> (CRE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational prospective cohort study from January 2018 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Non-critically ill subjects admitted to general medical wards who received antimicrobial therapy <48 h.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rectal swab cultures at admission and weekly for CRE surveillance. CRE isolates were confirmed using carbapenem disk diffusion susceptibility and genotypic carbapenemase testing. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 110 subjects, 66.4% were women, the mean age was 67 years, and 336 bacterial isolates were detected from rectal swab cultures. 55 (16.4%) isolates from 25 subjects exhibited phenotypic resistance to carbapenem. <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (50.9%) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (30.9%) were common CRE, harboring New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) (50.9%), oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48) (12.7%), and co-NDM/OXA-48 (20.0%). Subjects with acquired CRE had higher APACHE II scores (<i>P</i> = 0.030), received piperacillin-tazobactam (<i>P</i> = 0.004), underwent prolonged antimicrobial therapy (<i>P</i> = 0.009), and experienced longer hospital stays (<i>P</i> = 0.001) compared to CRE-negative subjects. None of the CRE-positive subjects developed an acquired infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acquired CRE colonization is prevalent among non-critically ill patients. Factors such as disease severity, the type and duration of antimicrobial therapy, and the length of hospital stays may increase the risk of CRE acquisition in non-critically ill populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the connection between non-critically ill hospitalized patients and the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE).

Design: An observational prospective cohort study from January 2018 to December 2019.

Setting: A single tertiary referral center.

Participants: Non-critically ill subjects admitted to general medical wards who received antimicrobial therapy <48 h.

Methods: Rectal swab cultures at admission and weekly for CRE surveillance. CRE isolates were confirmed using carbapenem disk diffusion susceptibility and genotypic carbapenemase testing. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were also evaluated.

Results: Of 110 subjects, 66.4% were women, the mean age was 67 years, and 336 bacterial isolates were detected from rectal swab cultures. 55 (16.4%) isolates from 25 subjects exhibited phenotypic resistance to carbapenem. Klebsiella pneumoniae (50.9%) and Escherichia coli (30.9%) were common CRE, harboring New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) (50.9%), oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48) (12.7%), and co-NDM/OXA-48 (20.0%). Subjects with acquired CRE had higher APACHE II scores (P = 0.030), received piperacillin-tazobactam (P = 0.004), underwent prolonged antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.009), and experienced longer hospital stays (P = 0.001) compared to CRE-negative subjects. None of the CRE-positive subjects developed an acquired infection.

Conclusions: Acquired CRE colonization is prevalent among non-critically ill patients. Factors such as disease severity, the type and duration of antimicrobial therapy, and the length of hospital stays may increase the risk of CRE acquisition in non-critically ill populations.

接受抗菌药物治疗的非危重患者通过每周直肠拭子获得耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌的流行病学数据:一项短期监测研究。
目的:探讨非危重住院患者与耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌(CRE)获得的关系。设计:2018年1月至2019年12月的观察性前瞻性队列研究。环境:单一三级转诊中心。研究对象:普通病房接受抗菌治疗的非危重患者。方法:入院时进行直肠拭子培养,每周进行CRE监测。采用碳青霉烯酮盘片扩散敏感性和基因型碳青霉烯酶检测对CRE分离株进行鉴定。临床特征和结果也进行了评估。结果:110例患者中,66.4%为女性,平均年龄67岁,直肠拭子培养检出细菌336株。来自25个实验对象的55株(16.4%)分离株对碳青霉烯烯表现出表型抗性。肺炎克雷伯菌(50.9%)和大肠杆菌(30.9%)是常见的CRE,含有新德里金属- β -内酰胺酶(NDM)(50.9%)、oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48)(12.7%)和co-NDM/OXA-48(20.0%)。获得性CRE受试者与CRE阴性受试者相比,APACHE II评分较高(P = 0.030),接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗(P = 0.004),延长抗菌治疗时间(P = 0.009),住院时间较长(P = 0.001)。cre阳性受试者均未发生获得性感染。结论:获得性CRE定植在非危重患者中普遍存在。疾病严重程度、抗菌药物治疗的类型和持续时间以及住院时间等因素可能会增加非危重患者获得CRE的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信