The Epidemiology of Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE) Among Mid-Atlantic Veterans.

Daniel M Guidot, Danielle Seaman, Roy A Pleasants, Joel C Boggan, Armando Bedoya, Aparna C Swaminathan, Matthew L Maciejewski, Bhavika Kaul, Robert M Tighe
{"title":"The Epidemiology of Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE) Among Mid-Atlantic Veterans.","authors":"Daniel M Guidot, Danielle Seaman, Roy A Pleasants, Joel C Boggan, Armando Bedoya, Aparna C Swaminathan, Matthew L Maciejewski, Bhavika Kaul, Robert M Tighe","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-882OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a unique phenotype with important prognosis and management implications in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CPFE-IPF) and other forms of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (CPFE-fILD). However, the epidemiology of CPFE is not well characterized, creating a barrier to clinical research needed to advance our understanding and management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the incidence, prevalence, and long-term outcomes of CPFE among a regional cohort of Veterans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed records for Veterans in the Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Health Care Network (includes North Carolina and Virginia) with International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 codes for pulmonary fibrosis between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. We stratified pulmonary fibrosis into IPF and fILD using diagnostic codes and chart review. We reviewed CT reports and classified cases as having CPFE according to documented emphysema; a thoracic radiologist overread a subset of scans for validation. We calculated annual incidence and prevalence of CPFE and compared characteristics between Veterans with CPFE and Veterans with fibrosis without emphysema using Chi-squared testing, Mann Whitney U testing, and paired t-tests. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox models to determine overall survival from diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2,414 Veterans with fibrotic ILD. Among 1,880 Veterans with IPF, 734 (39.0%) had CPFE-IPF; among 534 Veterans with fILD, 194 (36.3%) had CPFE-fILD. Agreement between CT reports and thoracic radiologist review was high (Kappa = 0.78). Annual CPFE prevalence ranged 71-100 per 100,000 Veterans, and incidence ranged 16-39 per 100,000 Veterans. CPFE was associated with male sex, lower BMI, greater tobacco history, higher FVC, reduced FEV1/FVC ratio, reduced DLCO, and increased oxygen utilization. CPFE was associated with increased mortality in unadjusted models. However, after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI, CPFE was not associated survival for both CPFE-IPF versus IPF without emphysema (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.33) as well as CPFE-fILD versus fILD without emphysema (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPFE has high incidence and prevalence among Veterans with IPF and fILD and has a distinct phenotype with diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Further studies are merited investigating diagnosis, treatment considerations, and long-term impacts in CPFE.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the incidence, prevalence, and long-term outcomes of CPFE among a regional cohort of Veterans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed records for Veterans in the Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Health Care Network (includes North Carolina and Virginia) with International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 codes for pulmonary fibrosis between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. We stratified pulmonary fibrosis into IPF and fILD using these ICD9 codes. We reviewed CT reports and classified cases as having CPFE according to documented emphysema; a thoracic radiologist overread a subset of scans for validation. We compared characteristics between Veterans with CPFE and Veterans with fibrosis without emphysema using Chi-squared testing, Mann Whitney U testing, and paired t-tests as appropriate. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox models to estimate and compare overall survival from diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2,414 Veterans with fibrotic ILD. Among 1,880 Veterans with IPF, 734 (39.0%) had CPFE-IPF; among 534 Veterans with fILD, 194 (36.3%) had CPFE-fILD. Agreement between CT reports and thoracic radiologist review was high (Kappa = 0.78). Overall CPFE prevalence was 107.48 per 100,000, and incidence was 28.53 per 100,000. CPFE was associated with male sex, lower BMI, greater tobacco history, higher FVC, reduced FEV1/FVC ratio, reduced DLCO, and increased oxygen utilization. CPFE was associated with increased mortality in unadjusted models. However, after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI, CPFE was not associated survival for both CPFE-IPF versus IPF without emphysema (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.33) as well as CPFE-fILD versus fILD without emphysema (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPFE has high incidence and prevalence among Veterans with IPF and fILD and has a distinct phenotype with diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Further studies are merited investigating care utilization, treatment considerations, and long-term impacts in CPFE.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-882OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a unique phenotype with important prognosis and management implications in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CPFE-IPF) and other forms of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (CPFE-fILD). However, the epidemiology of CPFE is not well characterized, creating a barrier to clinical research needed to advance our understanding and management.

Objectives: To investigate the incidence, prevalence, and long-term outcomes of CPFE among a regional cohort of Veterans.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records for Veterans in the Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Health Care Network (includes North Carolina and Virginia) with International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 codes for pulmonary fibrosis between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. We stratified pulmonary fibrosis into IPF and fILD using diagnostic codes and chart review. We reviewed CT reports and classified cases as having CPFE according to documented emphysema; a thoracic radiologist overread a subset of scans for validation. We calculated annual incidence and prevalence of CPFE and compared characteristics between Veterans with CPFE and Veterans with fibrosis without emphysema using Chi-squared testing, Mann Whitney U testing, and paired t-tests. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox models to determine overall survival from diagnosis.

Results: We identified 2,414 Veterans with fibrotic ILD. Among 1,880 Veterans with IPF, 734 (39.0%) had CPFE-IPF; among 534 Veterans with fILD, 194 (36.3%) had CPFE-fILD. Agreement between CT reports and thoracic radiologist review was high (Kappa = 0.78). Annual CPFE prevalence ranged 71-100 per 100,000 Veterans, and incidence ranged 16-39 per 100,000 Veterans. CPFE was associated with male sex, lower BMI, greater tobacco history, higher FVC, reduced FEV1/FVC ratio, reduced DLCO, and increased oxygen utilization. CPFE was associated with increased mortality in unadjusted models. However, after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI, CPFE was not associated survival for both CPFE-IPF versus IPF without emphysema (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.33) as well as CPFE-fILD versus fILD without emphysema (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.63).

Conclusions: CPFE has high incidence and prevalence among Veterans with IPF and fILD and has a distinct phenotype with diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Further studies are merited investigating diagnosis, treatment considerations, and long-term impacts in CPFE.

Objectives: To investigate the incidence, prevalence, and long-term outcomes of CPFE among a regional cohort of Veterans.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records for Veterans in the Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Health Care Network (includes North Carolina and Virginia) with International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 codes for pulmonary fibrosis between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. We stratified pulmonary fibrosis into IPF and fILD using these ICD9 codes. We reviewed CT reports and classified cases as having CPFE according to documented emphysema; a thoracic radiologist overread a subset of scans for validation. We compared characteristics between Veterans with CPFE and Veterans with fibrosis without emphysema using Chi-squared testing, Mann Whitney U testing, and paired t-tests as appropriate. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox models to estimate and compare overall survival from diagnosis.

Results: We identified 2,414 Veterans with fibrotic ILD. Among 1,880 Veterans with IPF, 734 (39.0%) had CPFE-IPF; among 534 Veterans with fILD, 194 (36.3%) had CPFE-fILD. Agreement between CT reports and thoracic radiologist review was high (Kappa = 0.78). Overall CPFE prevalence was 107.48 per 100,000, and incidence was 28.53 per 100,000. CPFE was associated with male sex, lower BMI, greater tobacco history, higher FVC, reduced FEV1/FVC ratio, reduced DLCO, and increased oxygen utilization. CPFE was associated with increased mortality in unadjusted models. However, after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI, CPFE was not associated survival for both CPFE-IPF versus IPF without emphysema (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.33) as well as CPFE-fILD versus fILD without emphysema (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.63).

Conclusions: CPFE has high incidence and prevalence among Veterans with IPF and fILD and has a distinct phenotype with diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Further studies are merited investigating care utilization, treatment considerations, and long-term impacts in CPFE.

中大西洋退伍军人合并肺纤维化和肺气肿(CPFE)的流行病学。
理由:合并肺纤维化和肺气肿(CPFE)是一种独特的表型,对特发性肺纤维化(CPFE- ipf)和其他形式的纤维化间质性肺疾病(CPFE- field)患者的预后和治疗具有重要意义。然而,CPFE的流行病学特征尚不清楚,这为临床研究创造了障碍,需要提高我们的认识和管理。目的:调查某地区退伍军人CPFE的发病率、患病率和长期预后。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2008年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间在退伍军人事务中大西洋医疗保健网络(包括北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州)中使用国际疾病分类(ICD)-9编码进行肺纤维化的退伍军人记录。我们使用诊断代码和图表复习将肺纤维化分为IPF和field。我们回顾了CT报告,并根据记录的肺气肿将病例分类为CPFE;一位胸科放射科医生为了验证,过度阅读了一组扫描结果。我们计算了CPFE的年发病率和患病率,并使用卡方检验、Mann Whitney U检验和配对t检验比较了CPFE和无肺气肿纤维化退伍军人之间的特征。我们使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox模型来确定诊断后的总生存率。结果:我们确定了2414名患有纤维化ILD的退伍军人。在1880名患有IPF的退伍军人中,734名(39.0%)患有CPFE-IPF;534例有field的退伍军人中,有194例(36.3%)患有cpfe - field。CT报告与胸椎放射科医师复查的一致性很高(Kappa = 0.78)。年CPFE患病率为每10万退伍军人71-100人,发病率为每10万退伍军人16-39人。CPFE与男性、较低的BMI、较高的吸烟史、较高的FVC、较低的FEV1/FVC比率、较低的DLCO和较高的氧利用率有关。在未调整的模型中,CPFE与死亡率增加有关。然而,在调整了年龄、性别和BMI后,CPFE-IPF与无肺气肿的IPF (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.33)以及CPFE- field与无肺气肿的field (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.63)的生存率与CPFE-IPF无关。结论:CPFE在IPF和field退伍军人中有较高的发病率和患病率,具有独特的表型,具有诊断和治疗意义。值得进一步研究CPFE的诊断、治疗考虑和长期影响。目的:调查某地区退伍军人CPFE的发病率、患病率和长期预后。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2008年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间在退伍军人事务中大西洋医疗保健网络(包括北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州)中使用国际疾病分类(ICD)-9编码进行肺纤维化的退伍军人记录。我们使用这些ICD9代码将肺纤维化分为IPF和field。我们回顾了CT报告,并根据记录的肺气肿将病例分类为CPFE;一位胸科放射科医生为了验证,过度阅读了一组扫描结果。我们使用卡方检验、Mann Whitney U检验和配对t检验比较CPFE退伍军人和无肺气肿纤维化退伍军人的特征。我们使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox模型来估计和比较诊断后的总生存率。结果:我们确定了2414名患有纤维化ILD的退伍军人。在1880名患有IPF的退伍军人中,734名(39.0%)患有CPFE-IPF;534例有field的退伍军人中,有194例(36.3%)患有cpfe - field。CT报告与胸椎放射科医师复查的一致性很高(Kappa = 0.78)。CPFE总患病率为107.48 / 10万,发病率为28.53 / 10万。CPFE与男性、较低的BMI、较高的吸烟史、较高的FVC、较低的FEV1/FVC比率、较低的DLCO和较高的氧利用率有关。在未调整的模型中,CPFE与死亡率增加有关。然而,在调整了年龄、性别和BMI后,CPFE-IPF与无肺气肿的IPF (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.33)以及CPFE- field与无肺气肿的field (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.63)的生存率与CPFE-IPF无关。结论:CPFE在IPF和field退伍军人中有较高的发病率和患病率,具有独特的表型,具有诊断和治疗意义。进一步的研究值得调查护理利用,治疗考虑和长期影响的CPFE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信