A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Bupivacaine Injection in Vaginal Vault and Paracervical Region Versus Vaginal Vault Infiltration with Bupivacaine After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
K S Kaloni, K K Roy, Deepali Garg, Avir Sarkar, Rinchen Zangmo, Anshul Kulshreshtha
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Bupivacaine Injection in Vaginal Vault and Paracervical Region Versus Vaginal Vault Infiltration with Bupivacaine After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.","authors":"K S Kaloni, K K Roy, Deepali Garg, Avir Sarkar, Rinchen Zangmo, Anshul Kulshreshtha","doi":"10.1007/s13224-024-02086-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Demand for laparoscopic surgeries have been on the rise in all surgical departments in the past few decades. Hysterectomy, one of the most common gynaecological procedures is preferred laparoscopically these days owing to their multiple benefits.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of Bupivacaine injection in Vault versus Paracervical Block and Vault Infiltration with Bupivacaine after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynaecology conditions were recruited and randomised into two comparable groups. Group I had 15 patients who received vaginal vault infiltration with 10 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. Group II had 15 patients who received paracervical block before surgery and vaginal vault infiltration after vault closure with 10 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. All patients were treated with injection paracetamol and NSAIDS. VAS score and need for additional analgesia were recorded at 1 h, 2 h and 6 h post-surgery. Any patient who reported a VAS score of more than 4 were given injection tramadol as rescue analgesia and recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the baseline characteristics were comparable except dysmenorrhoea (<i>P</i> = 0.017) and BMI (0.034) which showed statistically significant difference between the two groups. The VAS scores were significantly lower in combined group (Group I) when compared with vault infiltration group (Group II) across all time points (<i>P-</i> < 0.001). The need for rescue analgesia at 1-h post-surgery was lower in both the groups and comparable among the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.483). The need for rescue analgesia at 2 h {<i>P-</i> < 0.001} and 6 h post-surgery {<i>P-</i> < 0.001} were significantly lesser in Group II (combined group). No patients required additional analgesia in group II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two novel methods of administering local anaesthetic to alleviate post TLH pain when used in conjunction can significantly reduce pain and analgesia requirements making shorter hospital stay and early return to daily activities possible hence reducing cost per procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"75 Suppl 1","pages":"473-479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-02086-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Demand for laparoscopic surgeries have been on the rise in all surgical departments in the past few decades. Hysterectomy, one of the most common gynaecological procedures is preferred laparoscopically these days owing to their multiple benefits.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of Bupivacaine injection in Vault versus Paracervical Block and Vault Infiltration with Bupivacaine after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Materials and methods: Thirty women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynaecology conditions were recruited and randomised into two comparable groups. Group I had 15 patients who received vaginal vault infiltration with 10 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. Group II had 15 patients who received paracervical block before surgery and vaginal vault infiltration after vault closure with 10 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. All patients were treated with injection paracetamol and NSAIDS. VAS score and need for additional analgesia were recorded at 1 h, 2 h and 6 h post-surgery. Any patient who reported a VAS score of more than 4 were given injection tramadol as rescue analgesia and recorded.

Results: All the baseline characteristics were comparable except dysmenorrhoea (P = 0.017) and BMI (0.034) which showed statistically significant difference between the two groups. The VAS scores were significantly lower in combined group (Group I) when compared with vault infiltration group (Group II) across all time points (P- < 0.001). The need for rescue analgesia at 1-h post-surgery was lower in both the groups and comparable among the two groups (P = 0.483). The need for rescue analgesia at 2 h {P- < 0.001} and 6 h post-surgery {P- < 0.001} were significantly lesser in Group II (combined group). No patients required additional analgesia in group II.

Conclusion: Two novel methods of administering local anaesthetic to alleviate post TLH pain when used in conjunction can significantly reduce pain and analgesia requirements making shorter hospital stay and early return to daily activities possible hence reducing cost per procedure.

一项随机对照试验,比较阴道穹窿和宫颈旁注射布比卡因与阴道穹窿浸润布比卡因在腹腔镜全子宫切除术后的疗效。
背景:在过去的几十年里,所有外科部门对腹腔镜手术的需求一直在上升。子宫切除术是最常见的妇科手术之一,由于其多重好处,目前首选腹腔镜手术。目的:比较腹腔镜全子宫切除术后,静脉注射布比卡因与宫颈旁阻滞、宫颈浸润布比卡因的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:招募30名因妇科良性疾病接受腹腔镜全子宫切除术的妇女,随机分为两组。第一组15例患者行0.5%布比卡因10ml阴道穹窿浸润术。II组15例患者术前行宫颈旁阻滞,阴道穹窿闭合后行10ml 0.5%布比卡因阴道穹窿浸润。所有患者均注射扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药。分别于术后1 h、2 h和6 h记录VAS评分和追加镇痛需求。凡VAS评分大于4分的患者均给予曲马多静脉注射作为抢救性镇痛并进行记录。结果:两组患者除痛经(P = 0.017)和BMI(0.034)差异有统计学意义外,其他基线特征均具有可比性。在所有时间点上,联合组(I组)的VAS评分明显低于穹窿浸润组(II组)(P- P = 0.483)。结论:两种新的局部麻醉方法联合使用可以显著减少TLH后疼痛和镇痛需求,缩短住院时间,尽早恢复日常活动,从而降低每次手术的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信