Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Novel Technique to Manage Pelvic Organ Prolapse; An Original Study in Asian Women in Rural Area.

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nidhi Jain, Jyotsna Kamra, Shruthi Srinivas
{"title":"Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Novel Technique to Manage Pelvic Organ Prolapse; An Original Study in Asian Women in Rural Area.","authors":"Nidhi Jain, Jyotsna Kamra, Shruthi Srinivas","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01937-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic organ prolapse is a common gynecological disorder seen in Asian women, more in rural area. It is seen in both old age and young women. Presenting complaints includes something coming out of vagina, chronic pelvic pain, urinary and bowel symptoms. Sacrohysteropexy is the gold standard procedure for its management. Recently, laparoscopic pectopexy is described as a new alternative procedure, which is equally effective and associated with far lesser complications. Thus, this study is conducted to see the outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective observational study is conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, over the period of three years. Thirty-five patients, operated by laparoscopic pectopexy, were included in study. Twenty-five cases were young patient with prolapse, while 10 patients were of vault prolapse. Inclusion criteria were POP-Q stage ≥ II. All cases were done by same surgical team. Data were analyzed in terms of demographic profile. Video recording of surgery were checked to calculate operating time and estimated blood loss. All intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Follow-up was done at 1 month and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 35 cases, 10 were vault prolapse and 25 cases were uterine prolapse. No major intraoperative complications like visceral injury and major hemorrhage were found. Average operating time was 96 min. Average estimated blood loss was 50-100 ml. All patients were followed up at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. All patients were highly satisfied with surgery. None of the patients had de novo apical prolapse/recurrence of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic pectopexy is a novel promising technique to manage prolapse with minimal intraoperative and postoperative complications. It is a safe and feasible alternative to sacropexy. So, it should be considered as a first-line surgery for management of apical prolapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"75 Suppl 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01937-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common gynecological disorder seen in Asian women, more in rural area. It is seen in both old age and young women. Presenting complaints includes something coming out of vagina, chronic pelvic pain, urinary and bowel symptoms. Sacrohysteropexy is the gold standard procedure for its management. Recently, laparoscopic pectopexy is described as a new alternative procedure, which is equally effective and associated with far lesser complications. Thus, this study is conducted to see the outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy.

Method: This retrospective observational study is conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, over the period of three years. Thirty-five patients, operated by laparoscopic pectopexy, were included in study. Twenty-five cases were young patient with prolapse, while 10 patients were of vault prolapse. Inclusion criteria were POP-Q stage ≥ II. All cases were done by same surgical team. Data were analyzed in terms of demographic profile. Video recording of surgery were checked to calculate operating time and estimated blood loss. All intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Follow-up was done at 1 month and 6 months.

Results: Out of 35 cases, 10 were vault prolapse and 25 cases were uterine prolapse. No major intraoperative complications like visceral injury and major hemorrhage were found. Average operating time was 96 min. Average estimated blood loss was 50-100 ml. All patients were followed up at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. All patients were highly satisfied with surgery. None of the patients had de novo apical prolapse/recurrence of symptoms.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic pectopexy is a novel promising technique to manage prolapse with minimal intraoperative and postoperative complications. It is a safe and feasible alternative to sacropexy. So, it should be considered as a first-line surgery for management of apical prolapse.

腹腔镜下胸固定术:治疗盆腔器官脱垂的新技术亚洲农村妇女的一项原创性研究。
背景:盆腔器官脱垂是亚洲妇女常见的妇科疾病,多见于农村地区。老年妇女和年轻妇女都有。主诉包括阴道分泌物,慢性盆腔疼痛,泌尿和肠道症状。骶子宫切除术是其治疗的金标准程序。最近,腹腔镜胸固定术被描述为一种新的替代手术,它同样有效,并发症少得多。因此,本研究旨在了解腹腔镜下胸固定术的效果。方法:回顾性观察研究在妇产科进行,为期三年。本研究包括35例经腹腔镜胸固定术的患者。青年脱垂25例,拱顶脱垂10例。纳入标准为POP-Q≥II期。所有病例均由同一手术小组完成。根据人口统计资料对数据进行分析。检查手术录像,计算手术时间和估计出血量。记录术中及术后所有并发症。随访时间分别为1个月和6个月。结果:35例患者中,穹窿脱垂10例,子宫脱垂25例。术中未见内脏损伤、大出血等重大并发症。平均手术时间96 min,平均估计失血量50 ~ 100 ml。所有患者术后1个月、3个月、6个月随访。所有患者均对手术满意。所有患者均无新发根尖脱垂/症状复发。结论:腹腔镜胸固定术是一种治疗脱垂的新技术,术中术后并发症少。这是一种安全可行的替代骶骨切除术的方法。因此,应将其作为治疗根尖脱垂的一线手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信