Euthanasia and the Media in Spain (2019-2021).

IF 0.3 Q4 ETHICS
Rafael Amo Usanos, Mª Carmen Massé García, David Lorenzo Izquierdo, Montserrat Esquerda Aresté
{"title":"Euthanasia and the Media in Spain (2019-2021).","authors":"Rafael Amo Usanos, Mª Carmen Massé García, David Lorenzo Izquierdo, Montserrat Esquerda Aresté","doi":"10.30444/CB.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The regulation legal of euthanasia in Spain was preceded by an increase in media coverage. This study conducted quantitative and qualitative analyses of media coverage in the 12 most widely circulated Spanish media outlets between January 2019 and March 2021, immediately before the enactment of the law regulating euthanasia. In total, 281 news articles were examined. About 51.6% of the news articles supported euthanasia, 18.9% opposed it, and 29.5% were neutral. Qualitative analysis revealed a substantial distinction between pro- and anti-euthanasia groups. The semantic field of items in pro-euthanasia articles comprised \"law,\" \"death,\" \"suffering,\" and \"pain.\" In contrast, the semantic field of articles opposing euthanasia comprised \"life,\" \"death,\" \"people/person,\" and \"illness.\" The media predominantly favored euthanasia, albeit offering limited discussion of alternatives, such as palliative care. It is crucial to cultivate an ethical culture that empowers citizens to make end-of-life decisions based on clear-cut principles, rational reasoning, and diverse perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":"36 116","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regulation legal of euthanasia in Spain was preceded by an increase in media coverage. This study conducted quantitative and qualitative analyses of media coverage in the 12 most widely circulated Spanish media outlets between January 2019 and March 2021, immediately before the enactment of the law regulating euthanasia. In total, 281 news articles were examined. About 51.6% of the news articles supported euthanasia, 18.9% opposed it, and 29.5% were neutral. Qualitative analysis revealed a substantial distinction between pro- and anti-euthanasia groups. The semantic field of items in pro-euthanasia articles comprised "law," "death," "suffering," and "pain." In contrast, the semantic field of articles opposing euthanasia comprised "life," "death," "people/person," and "illness." The media predominantly favored euthanasia, albeit offering limited discussion of alternatives, such as palliative care. It is crucial to cultivate an ethical culture that empowers citizens to make end-of-life decisions based on clear-cut principles, rational reasoning, and diverse perspectives.

安乐死和西班牙媒体(2019-2021)。
在西班牙安乐死合法化之前,媒体对安乐死的报道有所增加。该研究对2019年1月至2021年3月期间西班牙12家最广泛传播的媒体报道进行了定量和定性分析,这是在安乐死法律颁布之前。总共审查了281篇新闻文章。大约51.6%的新闻文章支持安乐死,18.9%反对,29.5%保持中立。定性分析揭示了赞成和反对安乐死的群体之间的本质区别。在支持安乐死的文章中,条目的语义领域包括“法律”、“死亡”、“痛苦”和“痛苦”。相反,反对安乐死的文章的语义领域包括“生命”、“死亡”、“人/人”和“疾病”。媒体主要支持安乐死,尽管对其他选择的讨论有限,比如姑息治疗。培养一种道德文化,使公民能够根据明确的原则、理性的推理和不同的观点做出临终决定,这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: La revista Cuadernos de Bioética, órgano oficial de la Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica, publica cuatrimestralmente artículos y recensiones bibliográficas sobre todas las áreas de la bioética: fundamentación, ética de la investigación, bioética clínica, biojurídica, etc. Estos proceden de los aceptados en la revisión tutelada por los editores de la revista como de otros que por encargo el comité editorial solicite a sus autores. La edicion de la revista se financia con las aportaciones de los socios de AEBI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信