Roman Tatiana, Naji Kharouf, Calinescu Matei Dan, Bérangère Cournault, Olivier Etienne
{"title":"Who are the Hybrid Ceramics? Bibliometric Review.","authors":"Roman Tatiana, Naji Kharouf, Calinescu Matei Dan, Bérangère Cournault, Olivier Etienne","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An abundance of novel materials has been added to the dental prosthodontics market. Among these materials, a new category - the 'hybrid ceramic' seems to have gained researcher's interest. It is yet unclear which biomaterials should be labelled as 'hybrid ceramics'. This bibliometric and narrative review aims to find which biomaterials are referred to as 'hybrid ceramic' and describe their principal properties, when available.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two reviewers executed a literature search up to the 15th June 2024 in three electronic databases PubMED, Web of Science and Scopus. All commercial names of biomaterials labelled as \"hybrid ceramic\" were retrieved, if pertinent to the dental prosthesis. Articles referring to hybrid ceramic abutments were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>771 studies mentioning a 'hybrid ceramic' have been identified and 226 have been selected for this bibliometric study. 25 biomaterials have been identified labelled a 'hybrid ceramics,' including 4 experimental biomaterials, 2 indirect lutable composites, 3 glass ceramics, 2 printable permanent crown resins and 14 resin based CAD/CAM blocks. Their mechanical, optical and biological properties have been described, when available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid ceramics are popular in the research field yet are often mislabelled. A new, detailed classification is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: An abundance of novel materials has been added to the dental prosthodontics market. Among these materials, a new category - the 'hybrid ceramic' seems to have gained researcher's interest. It is yet unclear which biomaterials should be labelled as 'hybrid ceramics'. This bibliometric and narrative review aims to find which biomaterials are referred to as 'hybrid ceramic' and describe their principal properties, when available.
Materials and methods: Two reviewers executed a literature search up to the 15th June 2024 in three electronic databases PubMED, Web of Science and Scopus. All commercial names of biomaterials labelled as "hybrid ceramic" were retrieved, if pertinent to the dental prosthesis. Articles referring to hybrid ceramic abutments were excluded.
Results: 771 studies mentioning a 'hybrid ceramic' have been identified and 226 have been selected for this bibliometric study. 25 biomaterials have been identified labelled a 'hybrid ceramics,' including 4 experimental biomaterials, 2 indirect lutable composites, 3 glass ceramics, 2 printable permanent crown resins and 14 resin based CAD/CAM blocks. Their mechanical, optical and biological properties have been described, when available.
Conclusions: Hybrid ceramics are popular in the research field yet are often mislabelled. A new, detailed classification is needed.
目的:大量的新型材料已被添加到口腔修复市场。在这些材料中,一种新的材料——“混合陶瓷”似乎引起了研究人员的兴趣。目前还不清楚哪种生物材料应该被标记为“混合陶瓷”。这篇文献计量学和叙述性综述的目的是找到哪些生物材料被称为“混合陶瓷”,并描述它们的主要特性,如果有的话。材料与方法:两位审稿人在PubMED、Web of Science和Scopus三个电子数据库中检索截至2024年6月15日的文献。所有标记为“混合陶瓷”的生物材料的商业名称都被检索,如果与牙科假体相关。涉及混合陶瓷基台的文章被排除在外。结果:771篇提到“杂化陶瓷”的研究被确定,226篇被选择用于文献计量学研究。25种生物材料已被确定为“混合陶瓷”,包括4种实验生物材料,2种间接复合材料,3种玻璃陶瓷,2种可打印的永久冠树脂和14种基于树脂的CAD/CAM块。如果有的话,它们的机械、光学和生物特性已经被描述。结论:杂化陶瓷在研究领域很受欢迎,但常被误贴。需要一种新的、详细的分类。