Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at very low parasitaemias using a commercially available LAMP assay and RDT.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ruth O Payne, Nick J Edwards, Yrene Themistocleous, Sarah E Silk, Jordan R Barrett, Thomas A Rawlinson, Ian W Lim, Simon J Draper, Angela M Minassian
{"title":"Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at very low parasitaemias using a commercially available LAMP assay and RDT.","authors":"Ruth O Payne, Nick J Edwards, Yrene Themistocleous, Sarah E Silk, Jordan R Barrett, Thomas A Rawlinson, Ian W Lim, Simon J Draper, Angela M Minassian","doi":"10.1093/trstmh/traf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is the most common tropical infection in the UK. Current guidelines suggest that testing on 3 consecutive days is required following an initial negative result. This study aimed to see whether newer diagnostics (loop-mediated amplification assay [LAMP]) had sufficient sensitivity to support a change in diagnostic practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from 11 participants who had undergone controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum malaria were assessed from day 6 (C+6) for malaria positivity using the Carestart Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and from C+4 using the Alethia Malaria LAMP assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction had been performed twice daily during CHMI follow-up. A retrospective analysis of samples submitted to the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for malaria testing over a 5-y period was conducted, evaluating the combination of the Carestart RDT alongside blood film analysis, as per UK guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CHMI samples, LAMP was positive for all parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml, whereas RDTs were less reliable (59% positive for parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml). The combination of RDT and blood films for clinical samples diagnosed most infections, but only a minority of negative samples had subsequent tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAMP has higher sensitivity than current UK recommended methods, with a potential to review the requirement for additional days of testing in the majority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23218,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/traf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria is the most common tropical infection in the UK. Current guidelines suggest that testing on 3 consecutive days is required following an initial negative result. This study aimed to see whether newer diagnostics (loop-mediated amplification assay [LAMP]) had sufficient sensitivity to support a change in diagnostic practice.

Methods: Blood samples from 11 participants who had undergone controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum malaria were assessed from day 6 (C+6) for malaria positivity using the Carestart Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and from C+4 using the Alethia Malaria LAMP assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction had been performed twice daily during CHMI follow-up. A retrospective analysis of samples submitted to the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for malaria testing over a 5-y period was conducted, evaluating the combination of the Carestart RDT alongside blood film analysis, as per UK guidelines.

Results: In CHMI samples, LAMP was positive for all parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml, whereas RDTs were less reliable (59% positive for parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml). The combination of RDT and blood films for clinical samples diagnosed most infections, but only a minority of negative samples had subsequent tests.

Conclusions: LAMP has higher sensitivity than current UK recommended methods, with a potential to review the requirement for additional days of testing in the majority of patients.

利用市售LAMP检测和RDT诊断恶性疟原虫疟疾的极低寄生虫血症。
背景:疟疾是英国最常见的热带传染病。目前的指导方针建议,在初步结果为阴性后,需要连续3天进行检测。本研究旨在了解新的诊断方法(环介导扩增试验[LAMP])是否具有足够的灵敏度来支持诊断实践的改变。方法:从第6天(C+6)开始,使用Carestart疟疾快速诊断试验(RDT)对11例恶性疟原虫控制的人疟疾感染(CHMI)患者的血液样本进行疟疾阳性评估,从第4天开始使用Alethia疟疾LAMP检测。在CHMI随访期间每日进行两次定量聚合酶链反应。对提交给谢菲尔德教学医院进行5年疟疾检测的样本进行了回顾性分析,根据英国指南评估了Carestart RDT与血膜分析的结合。结果:在CHMI样品中,所有寄生虫血症>1000寄生虫/ml的LAMP阳性,而rdt的可靠性较低(59%的寄生虫血症>1000寄生虫/ml阳性)。临床样本的RDT和血片联合诊断出大多数感染,但只有少数阴性样本进行了后续检测。结论:LAMP比目前英国推荐的方法具有更高的敏感性,有可能审查大多数患者额外检测天数的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
115
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene publishes authoritative and impactful original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of tropical medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信