Ruth O Payne, Nick J Edwards, Yrene Themistocleous, Sarah E Silk, Jordan R Barrett, Thomas A Rawlinson, Ian W Lim, Simon J Draper, Angela M Minassian
{"title":"Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at very low parasitaemias using a commercially available LAMP assay and RDT.","authors":"Ruth O Payne, Nick J Edwards, Yrene Themistocleous, Sarah E Silk, Jordan R Barrett, Thomas A Rawlinson, Ian W Lim, Simon J Draper, Angela M Minassian","doi":"10.1093/trstmh/traf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is the most common tropical infection in the UK. Current guidelines suggest that testing on 3 consecutive days is required following an initial negative result. This study aimed to see whether newer diagnostics (loop-mediated amplification assay [LAMP]) had sufficient sensitivity to support a change in diagnostic practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from 11 participants who had undergone controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum malaria were assessed from day 6 (C+6) for malaria positivity using the Carestart Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and from C+4 using the Alethia Malaria LAMP assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction had been performed twice daily during CHMI follow-up. A retrospective analysis of samples submitted to the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for malaria testing over a 5-y period was conducted, evaluating the combination of the Carestart RDT alongside blood film analysis, as per UK guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CHMI samples, LAMP was positive for all parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml, whereas RDTs were less reliable (59% positive for parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml). The combination of RDT and blood films for clinical samples diagnosed most infections, but only a minority of negative samples had subsequent tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAMP has higher sensitivity than current UK recommended methods, with a potential to review the requirement for additional days of testing in the majority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23218,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/traf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Malaria is the most common tropical infection in the UK. Current guidelines suggest that testing on 3 consecutive days is required following an initial negative result. This study aimed to see whether newer diagnostics (loop-mediated amplification assay [LAMP]) had sufficient sensitivity to support a change in diagnostic practice.
Methods: Blood samples from 11 participants who had undergone controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum malaria were assessed from day 6 (C+6) for malaria positivity using the Carestart Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and from C+4 using the Alethia Malaria LAMP assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction had been performed twice daily during CHMI follow-up. A retrospective analysis of samples submitted to the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for malaria testing over a 5-y period was conducted, evaluating the combination of the Carestart RDT alongside blood film analysis, as per UK guidelines.
Results: In CHMI samples, LAMP was positive for all parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml, whereas RDTs were less reliable (59% positive for parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml). The combination of RDT and blood films for clinical samples diagnosed most infections, but only a minority of negative samples had subsequent tests.
Conclusions: LAMP has higher sensitivity than current UK recommended methods, with a potential to review the requirement for additional days of testing in the majority of patients.
期刊介绍:
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene publishes authoritative and impactful original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of tropical medicine.