Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in detecting sinonasal pathology using clinical imaging modalities: a systematic review.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.4193/Rhin25.044
D-P Petsiou, D Spinos, A Martinos, J Muzaffar, G Garas, C Georgalas
{"title":"Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in detecting sinonasal pathology using clinical imaging modalities: a systematic review.","authors":"D-P Petsiou, D Spinos, A Martinos, J Muzaffar, G Garas, C Georgalas","doi":"10.4193/Rhin25.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sinonasal pathology can be complex and requires a systematic and meticulous approach. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in sinonasal imaging, but its clinical applicability remains an area of ongoing research. This systematic review evaluates the methodologies and clinical relevance of AI in detecting sinonasal pathology through radiological imaging.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Key search terms included \"artificial intelligence,\" \"deep learning,\" \"machine learning,\" \"neural network,\" and \"paranasal sinuses,\". Abstract and full-text screening was conducted using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, AI architectures used (e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Machine Learning classifiers), and clinical characteristics, such as imaging modality (e.g., Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 studies were analyzed, with 85% retrospective, 68% single-center, and 92.5% using internal databases. CT was the most common imaging modality (60.4%), and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) was the most studied condition (34.0%). Forty-one studies employed neural networks, with classification as the most frequent AI task (35.8%). Key performance metrics included Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Quality assessment based on CONSORT-AI yielded a mean score of 16.0 ± 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI shows promise in improving sinonasal imaging interpretation. However, as existing research is predominantly retrospective and single-center, further studies are needed to evaluate AI's generalizability and applicability. More research is also required to explore AI's role in treatment planning and post-treatment prediction for clinical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin25.044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sinonasal pathology can be complex and requires a systematic and meticulous approach. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in sinonasal imaging, but its clinical applicability remains an area of ongoing research. This systematic review evaluates the methodologies and clinical relevance of AI in detecting sinonasal pathology through radiological imaging.

Methodology: Key search terms included "artificial intelligence," "deep learning," "machine learning," "neural network," and "paranasal sinuses,". Abstract and full-text screening was conducted using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, AI architectures used (e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Machine Learning classifiers), and clinical characteristics, such as imaging modality (e.g., Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)).

Results: A total of 53 studies were analyzed, with 85% retrospective, 68% single-center, and 92.5% using internal databases. CT was the most common imaging modality (60.4%), and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) was the most studied condition (34.0%). Forty-one studies employed neural networks, with classification as the most frequent AI task (35.8%). Key performance metrics included Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Quality assessment based on CONSORT-AI yielded a mean score of 16.0 ± 2.

Conclusions: AI shows promise in improving sinonasal imaging interpretation. However, as existing research is predominantly retrospective and single-center, further studies are needed to evaluate AI's generalizability and applicability. More research is also required to explore AI's role in treatment planning and post-treatment prediction for clinical integration.

人工智能在使用临床成像方式检测鼻窦病理中的有效性:系统综述。
背景:鼻窦病理可能是复杂的,需要系统和细致的方法。人工智能(AI)具有提高鼻窦成像诊断准确性和效率的潜力,但其临床适用性仍是一个正在进行的研究领域。这篇系统的综述评估了人工智能在通过放射成像检测鼻窦病理中的方法和临床意义。方法:关键搜索词包括“人工智能”、“深度学习”、“机器学习”、“神经网络”和“副鼻窦”。摘要和全文筛选采用预定义的纳入和排除标准。根据研究设计、使用的人工智能架构(如卷积神经网络(CNN)、机器学习分类器)和临床特征(如成像方式(如计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI))提取数据。结果:共分析了53项研究,其中85%为回顾性研究,68%为单中心研究,92.5%为内部数据库。CT是最常见的成像方式(60.4%),无鼻息肉病的慢性鼻窦炎(CRSsNP)是研究最多的情况(34.0%)。41项研究使用了神经网络,其中分类是最常见的人工智能任务(35.8%)。关键性能指标包括曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度、特异性、精密度和f1评分。基于concont - ai的质量评估平均得分为16.0±2分。结论:人工智能在改善鼻窦成像判读方面具有广阔前景。然而,由于现有的研究以回顾性和单中心为主,需要进一步的研究来评估人工智能的泛化和适用性。人工智能在治疗计划和治疗后预测的临床整合中的作用也需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信