Effects of sevoflurane and propofol for elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_154_24
Qi Wang, Jing Luan, Wenli Yu
{"title":"Effects of sevoflurane and propofol for elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qi Wang, Jing Luan, Wenli Yu","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_154_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the safety of propofol and sevoflurane for general anesthesia in elderly.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All studies on sevoflurane, propofol, and hyperamylasemia from the establishment of Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from database establishment to December 2024 were searched. Literatures were screened, and data were extracted on the grounds of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review Manager (RevMan) (Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration.) was used for statistical analysis. Outcomes assessed included time to spontaneous eye opening, extubation time, incidence rate of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), postoperative delirium, agitation, nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference in time to spontaneous eye opening (<i>P</i> = 0.54), the incidence of POCD (<i>P</i> = 0.07), postoperative delirium (<i>P</i> = 0.37), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (<i>P</i> = 0.8) between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. Compared with propofol groups, extubation time (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) was significantly shortened by sevoflurane groups. Conversely, compared with sevoflurane, the incidence of postoperative agitation in the propofol group was significantly reduced (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference in time to spontaneous eye-opening, the incidence of POCD, postoperative delirium, postoperative nausea, and vomiting between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. However, compared with propofol, sevoflurane can significantly shorten intubation time. The incidence of postoperative agitation (<i>P</i> = 0.04) was significantly lower in the propofol group compared with sevoflurane.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"30 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_154_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the safety of propofol and sevoflurane for general anesthesia in elderly.

Materials and methods: All studies on sevoflurane, propofol, and hyperamylasemia from the establishment of Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from database establishment to December 2024 were searched. Literatures were screened, and data were extracted on the grounds of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review Manager (RevMan) (Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration.) was used for statistical analysis. Outcomes assessed included time to spontaneous eye opening, extubation time, incidence rate of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), postoperative delirium, agitation, nausea and vomiting.

Results: Fourteen trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference in time to spontaneous eye opening (P = 0.54), the incidence of POCD (P = 0.07), postoperative delirium (P = 0.37), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = 0.8) between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. Compared with propofol groups, extubation time (P < 0.0001) was significantly shortened by sevoflurane groups. Conversely, compared with sevoflurane, the incidence of postoperative agitation in the propofol group was significantly reduced (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: There was no difference in time to spontaneous eye-opening, the incidence of POCD, postoperative delirium, postoperative nausea, and vomiting between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. However, compared with propofol, sevoflurane can significantly shorten intubation time. The incidence of postoperative agitation (P = 0.04) was significantly lower in the propofol group compared with sevoflurane.

七氟醚和异丙酚对老年患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:评价异丙酚与七氟醚用于老年人全身麻醉的安全性。材料与方法:检索Embase、Ovid、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar数据库建立至2024年12月间关于七氟醚、异丙酚和高淀粉酶血症的所有研究。筛选文献,根据纳入和排除标准提取资料。Review Manager (RevMan) (Version 5.4)Cochrane Collaboration.)进行统计分析。评估的结果包括自发睁眼时间、拔管时间、术后认知功能障碍(POCD)发生率、术后谵妄、躁动、恶心和呕吐。结果:本荟萃分析确定并纳入了14项试验。结果显示,七氟醚组与异丙酚组在自发睁眼时间(P = 0.54)、POCD发生率(P = 0.07)、术后谵妄发生率(P = 0.37)、术后恶心呕吐发生率(P = 0.8)方面均无显著差异。与异丙酚组比较,七氟醚组拔管时间明显缩短(P < 0.0001)。相反,与七氟醚相比,异丙酚组术后躁动发生率明显降低(P = 0.04)。结论:七氟醚组与异丙酚组在自发睁眼时间、POCD发生率、术后谵妄、术后恶心、呕吐发生率等方面均无差异。但与异丙酚相比,七氟醚可显著缩短插管时间。与七氟醚相比,异丙酚组术后躁动发生率显著降低(P = 0.04)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信