{"title":"Effects of sevoflurane and propofol for elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qi Wang, Jing Luan, Wenli Yu","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_154_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the safety of propofol and sevoflurane for general anesthesia in elderly.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All studies on sevoflurane, propofol, and hyperamylasemia from the establishment of Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from database establishment to December 2024 were searched. Literatures were screened, and data were extracted on the grounds of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review Manager (RevMan) (Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration.) was used for statistical analysis. Outcomes assessed included time to spontaneous eye opening, extubation time, incidence rate of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), postoperative delirium, agitation, nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference in time to spontaneous eye opening (<i>P</i> = 0.54), the incidence of POCD (<i>P</i> = 0.07), postoperative delirium (<i>P</i> = 0.37), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (<i>P</i> = 0.8) between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. Compared with propofol groups, extubation time (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) was significantly shortened by sevoflurane groups. Conversely, compared with sevoflurane, the incidence of postoperative agitation in the propofol group was significantly reduced (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference in time to spontaneous eye-opening, the incidence of POCD, postoperative delirium, postoperative nausea, and vomiting between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. However, compared with propofol, sevoflurane can significantly shorten intubation time. The incidence of postoperative agitation (<i>P</i> = 0.04) was significantly lower in the propofol group compared with sevoflurane.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"30 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_154_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the safety of propofol and sevoflurane for general anesthesia in elderly.
Materials and methods: All studies on sevoflurane, propofol, and hyperamylasemia from the establishment of Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from database establishment to December 2024 were searched. Literatures were screened, and data were extracted on the grounds of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review Manager (RevMan) (Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration.) was used for statistical analysis. Outcomes assessed included time to spontaneous eye opening, extubation time, incidence rate of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), postoperative delirium, agitation, nausea and vomiting.
Results: Fourteen trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference in time to spontaneous eye opening (P = 0.54), the incidence of POCD (P = 0.07), postoperative delirium (P = 0.37), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = 0.8) between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. Compared with propofol groups, extubation time (P < 0.0001) was significantly shortened by sevoflurane groups. Conversely, compared with sevoflurane, the incidence of postoperative agitation in the propofol group was significantly reduced (P = 0.04).
Conclusion: There was no difference in time to spontaneous eye-opening, the incidence of POCD, postoperative delirium, postoperative nausea, and vomiting between the sevoflurane and propofol groups. However, compared with propofol, sevoflurane can significantly shorten intubation time. The incidence of postoperative agitation (P = 0.04) was significantly lower in the propofol group compared with sevoflurane.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.