The effects of intrathecal fentanyl on postoperative opioid utilization rates in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yinghua Gu, Yan Li, Wenxun Liu, Xin Liu, Qingshan Ye
{"title":"The effects of intrathecal fentanyl on postoperative opioid utilization rates in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yinghua Gu, Yan Li, Wenxun Liu, Xin Liu, Qingshan Ye","doi":"10.1186/s13741-025-00541-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various types of lower extremity orthopedic surgeries can cause severe postoperative pain in elderly patients. Achieving adequate pain control while minimizing the use of opioids is advantageous, as it helps reduce postoperative complications and facilitates recovery. In this randomized trial, we compared the opioid utilization rates of elderly patients who received or not receive intrathecal fentanyl as an anesthesia adjuvant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 180 elderly patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the BF1 group (bupivacaine plus 25 µg of fentanyl), the BF2 group (bupivacaine plus 50 µg of fentanyl), or the B group (bupivacaine), achieving a final between-group ratio of 2:2:1. Our primary outcome was the rate of opioid use, while secondary outcomes included the NRS score and the utilization rate of analgesic drugs on PODS1-3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The usage rate of opioid analgesics within the POD3 was higher in B group compared to BF1 and BF2 groups (100% vs. 79.2% and 80.3%, respectively; P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the usage rate of opioid analgesics among the groups within the PODS1-2 (P > 0.05). The incidence of patients with NRS scores ≥ 4 was significantly lower in BF1 and BF2 groups compared to B group on PODS2-3 (POD2, 62.2% and 68.9% vs. 93.8%, respectively; P < 0.05; POD3, 16.2% and 17.6% vs. 40.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). Additionally, BF1 group had a lower incidence of NRS scores ≥ 4 compared to B group on POD1 (P < 0.05). The rate of analgesic drug use was similar among the three groups on POD1-3 (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery, intrathecal fentanyl as an anesthetic adjuvant may correlate with reduced pain scores on PODS1-3 and decreased opioid requirements on POD3.High-dose fentanyl does not provide significant therapeutic advantages.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ), Clinical Trials identifier ChiCTR2200058362 (2022/04/07).</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00541-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Various types of lower extremity orthopedic surgeries can cause severe postoperative pain in elderly patients. Achieving adequate pain control while minimizing the use of opioids is advantageous, as it helps reduce postoperative complications and facilitates recovery. In this randomized trial, we compared the opioid utilization rates of elderly patients who received or not receive intrathecal fentanyl as an anesthesia adjuvant.

Methods: A total of 180 elderly patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the BF1 group (bupivacaine plus 25 µg of fentanyl), the BF2 group (bupivacaine plus 50 µg of fentanyl), or the B group (bupivacaine), achieving a final between-group ratio of 2:2:1. Our primary outcome was the rate of opioid use, while secondary outcomes included the NRS score and the utilization rate of analgesic drugs on PODS1-3.

Results: The usage rate of opioid analgesics within the POD3 was higher in B group compared to BF1 and BF2 groups (100% vs. 79.2% and 80.3%, respectively; P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the usage rate of opioid analgesics among the groups within the PODS1-2 (P > 0.05). The incidence of patients with NRS scores ≥ 4 was significantly lower in BF1 and BF2 groups compared to B group on PODS2-3 (POD2, 62.2% and 68.9% vs. 93.8%, respectively; P < 0.05; POD3, 16.2% and 17.6% vs. 40.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). Additionally, BF1 group had a lower incidence of NRS scores ≥ 4 compared to B group on POD1 (P < 0.05). The rate of analgesic drug use was similar among the three groups on POD1-3 (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: In elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery, intrathecal fentanyl as an anesthetic adjuvant may correlate with reduced pain scores on PODS1-3 and decreased opioid requirements on POD3.High-dose fentanyl does not provide significant therapeutic advantages.

Trial registration: The study registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ), Clinical Trials identifier ChiCTR2200058362 (2022/04/07).

鞘内芬太尼对老年下肢骨科手术患者术后阿片类药物使用率的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:各种类型的下肢骨科手术可引起老年患者术后严重疼痛。在尽量减少阿片类药物使用的同时实现充分的疼痛控制是有利的,因为它有助于减少术后并发症并促进恢复。在这项随机试验中,我们比较了接受或未接受鞘内芬太尼作为麻醉辅助剂的老年患者的阿片类药物使用率。方法:共入组180例老年患者。随机分为BF1组(布比卡因加芬太尼25µg)、BF2组(布比卡因加芬太尼50µg)和B组(布比卡因),最终组间比例为2:2:1。我们的主要终点是阿片类药物的使用率,次要终点包括NRS评分和PODS1-3镇痛药物的使用率。结果:B组患者POD3内阿片类镇痛药使用率高于BF1和BF2组(100%,分别为79.2%和80.3%;P 0.05)。在PODS2-3上,BF1和BF2组NRS评分≥4的患者发生率显著低于B组(POD2分别为62.2%和68.9% vs. 93.8%;P 0.05)。结论:在接受下肢手术的老年患者中,鞘内芬太尼作为麻醉辅助剂可能与PODS1-3疼痛评分降低和pods3阿片类药物需求降低相关。大剂量芬太尼不提供显著的治疗优势。试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心(www.chictr.org.cn)注册,临床试验标识号ChiCTR2200058362(2022/04/07)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信