Qian-Hui Tang, Han Yang, Zhong Qin, Qiu-Ning Lin, Ming Hu, Xiao Qin, Jing Chen
{"title":"Influencing factors of false lumen thrombosis in type B aortic dissection: A single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Qian-Hui Tang, Han Yang, Zhong Qin, Qiu-Ning Lin, Ming Hu, Xiao Qin, Jing Chen","doi":"10.1515/med-2025-1179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the factors associated with false lumen thrombosis in preoperative type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2008 and December 2017, TBAD patients were evaluated. Participants were divided into patent, partial thrombosis, and complete thrombosis groups according to the status of the false lumen. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the factors associated with false lumen thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 285 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Patients in the complete thrombosis group were significantly older than those in the partial thrombosis and patent groups (59 ± 10 vs 53 ± 11 and 50 ± 11 years, respectively), and combined shorter dissection lengths (290 ± 101 vs 354 ± 92 and 351 ± 102 mm, respectively). The following factors were associated with partial thrombosis of the false lumen with an odds ratio (OR) <1: primary tear size (OR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.03), last tear size (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.04), and the total number of tears (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TBAD patients older than 59 years or with aortic dissection lengths of less than 290 mm were more likely to have a thrombosed false lumen.</p>","PeriodicalId":19715,"journal":{"name":"Open Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"20251179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2025-1179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the factors associated with false lumen thrombosis in preoperative type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients.
Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2017, TBAD patients were evaluated. Participants were divided into patent, partial thrombosis, and complete thrombosis groups according to the status of the false lumen. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the factors associated with false lumen thrombosis.
Results: A total of 285 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Patients in the complete thrombosis group were significantly older than those in the partial thrombosis and patent groups (59 ± 10 vs 53 ± 11 and 50 ± 11 years, respectively), and combined shorter dissection lengths (290 ± 101 vs 354 ± 92 and 351 ± 102 mm, respectively). The following factors were associated with partial thrombosis of the false lumen with an odds ratio (OR) <1: primary tear size (OR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99; p = 0.03), last tear size (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; p = 0.04), and the total number of tears (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; p = 0.02).
Conclusions: TBAD patients older than 59 years or with aortic dissection lengths of less than 290 mm were more likely to have a thrombosed false lumen.
期刊介绍:
Open Medicine is an open access journal that provides users with free, instant, and continued access to all content worldwide. The primary goal of the journal has always been a focus on maintaining the high quality of its published content. Its mission is to facilitate the exchange of ideas between medical science researchers from different countries. Papers connected to all fields of medicine and public health are welcomed. Open Medicine accepts submissions of research articles, reviews, case reports, letters to editor and book reviews.