Evaluation of Turkish Ophthalmologists' Opinions on Surgical Waste During Cataract Surgery.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-05-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/9972323
Bahadır Utlu, Betül Dertsiz Kozan, Yunus Emre Erat
{"title":"Evaluation of Turkish Ophthalmologists' Opinions on Surgical Waste During Cataract Surgery.","authors":"Bahadır Utlu, Betül Dertsiz Kozan, Yunus Emre Erat","doi":"10.1155/joph/9972323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Objective: We aimed to investigate the attitudes of ophthalmologists toward the excessive amount of waste generated during modern cataract surgery practices. <b>Methods:</b> Survey study and a prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study. An online questionnaire consisting of 23 questions was directed to ophthalmologists practicing in Erzurum Province and its surroundings. Duplicate responses were prevented by allowing only one submission to the survey. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire only if they performed cataract surgery. <b>Results:</b> The study included 102 ophthalmologists through an online survey. Approximately 43% of the participants performed between 200-500 cataract surgeries per year. 90% of the respondents believed that operating room waste was excessive and should be reduced. Among the drivers of waste/garbage generation in the study, the most common response (78%) was the widely recognized safety benefits of disposables. Again, when asked about the main drivers for using disposable instruments in ophthalmic surgery, the most common response was reduced liability (77%). 80% of respondents said that device and supply manufacturers should consider the environmental/carbon footprint in product design. When asked to what extent it reduces your willingness to use a material or medication in more than one patient, the highest preferred answer was the risk of endophthalmitis, while the least preferred answer was decreased efficiency. <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, most ophthalmologists agree that a lot of waste is generated during surgery and that more widespread use of sterilizable materials rather than disposables could reduce waste.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9972323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/9972323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Objective: We aimed to investigate the attitudes of ophthalmologists toward the excessive amount of waste generated during modern cataract surgery practices. Methods: Survey study and a prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study. An online questionnaire consisting of 23 questions was directed to ophthalmologists practicing in Erzurum Province and its surroundings. Duplicate responses were prevented by allowing only one submission to the survey. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire only if they performed cataract surgery. Results: The study included 102 ophthalmologists through an online survey. Approximately 43% of the participants performed between 200-500 cataract surgeries per year. 90% of the respondents believed that operating room waste was excessive and should be reduced. Among the drivers of waste/garbage generation in the study, the most common response (78%) was the widely recognized safety benefits of disposables. Again, when asked about the main drivers for using disposable instruments in ophthalmic surgery, the most common response was reduced liability (77%). 80% of respondents said that device and supply manufacturers should consider the environmental/carbon footprint in product design. When asked to what extent it reduces your willingness to use a material or medication in more than one patient, the highest preferred answer was the risk of endophthalmitis, while the least preferred answer was decreased efficiency. Conclusion: In conclusion, most ophthalmologists agree that a lot of waste is generated during surgery and that more widespread use of sterilizable materials rather than disposables could reduce waste.

土耳其眼科医生对白内障手术中手术浪费意见的评价
目的:探讨眼科医生对现代白内障手术过程中产生的大量废物的态度。方法:调查研究和前瞻性、横断面、描述性研究。一份包含23个问题的在线调查问卷被发给了在埃尔祖鲁姆省及其周边地区执业的眼科医生。通过只允许一次提交调查,避免了重复的答复。只有做过白内障手术的参与者才被要求填写问卷。结果:本研究通过在线调查纳入102名眼科医生。大约43%的参与者每年进行200-500次白内障手术。九成受访者认为手术室浪费过多,应予减少。在研究中产生废物/垃圾的驱动因素中,最常见的反应(78%)是人们普遍认可的一次性用品的安全效益。再次,当被问及在眼科手术中使用一次性器械的主要驱动因素时,最常见的回答是减少责任(77%)。80%的受访者表示,设备和电源制造商应在产品设计中考虑环境/碳足迹。当被问及它在多大程度上降低了您在多个患者中使用某种材料或药物的意愿时,最受欢迎的答案是眼内炎的风险,而最不受欢迎的答案是效率降低。结论:综上所述,大多数眼科医生认为手术过程中产生了大量的浪费,更广泛地使用可消毒材料而不是一次性材料可以减少浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信