Ventilator-induced lung injury in rat models: are they all equal in the race?

Abstract

Risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is an inevitable and precarious accompaniment of ventilator treatment in critically ill patients worldwide. It can both instigate and aggravate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) where the only prevention or treatment so far has been empirical approach of what is considered to be lung protective ventilator settings in an attempt to shield the lung tissues against the mechanical stress that unavoidably follows ventilator treatment. The weakened state of the patients limits clinical drug research and pushes for drug discovery in animal models. Mice and rats are often the choice of small animal model, representing about 95% of all laboratory animal studies, as their physiology can mimic that which is found in humans. Mice have been a more popular choice for ventilator studies but due to technical issues, there is some advantage gained in using rats as they are substantially larger. Inducing VILI and ARDS in these models can prove challenging and often the acute nature of the injury used to produce similar tissue damage as in humans does not necessarily fully reflect clinical reality. The aim of this review was to analyse and summarize methods of recent publications in the field, describing what approaches have been utilized to simulate these conditions, possibly identifying a common track enabling comparison of results between studies. However, the study shows a high variety of methods employed by researchers causing comparisons of results difficult and perhaps implying that a more standardized approach should be used.