Weiwei Huang, Jianhua Dong, Song Luo, Jun Zhang, Lingyan Zhang, Yan Ma, Bin Wang, Jingxin Wang, Weiqiang Dou, Li Qi, Weixin Hu, Longjiang Zhang
{"title":"Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking evaluates left atrial strain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and mitral regurgitation.","authors":"Weiwei Huang, Jianhua Dong, Song Luo, Jun Zhang, Lingyan Zhang, Yan Ma, Bin Wang, Jingxin Wang, Weiqiang Dou, Li Qi, Weixin Hu, Longjiang Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09612033251344983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo explore left atrial (LA) function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mitral regurgitation assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking (MRI-FT).MethodIn this study, 64 SLE patients (35.0 ± 12.3 years, 49 females) and 50 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (32.1 ± 11.2 years, 32 females) were analyzed. Patients with SLE were further classified into two subgroups according to mitral regurgitation defined by echocardiography: mitral regurgitation subgroup (<i>n</i> = 32) and non-mitral regurgitation subgroup (<i>n</i> = 32). All subjects underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination and SLE patients underwent extra laboratory testing. LA volume and strain parameters were compared among the three groups, and a correlation analysis was further performed between CMR parameters and clinical variables.ResultsPatients in both mitral regurgitation and non-mitral regurgitation subgroups showed higher LAVmin (29.15 ± 7.5, 26.22 ± 8.23 vs 21.68 ± 7.67, <i>p</i> = .003, .026) and LAVimin (17.44,14.9 vs 12.62, <i>p</i> = .002,.046) than healthy control subjects. Abnormal LA reservoir, conduit and bump strain were also observed in SLE patients (all <i>p</i> < .05), with more severe reservoir (<i>p</i> = .006, .031) and bump strain (<i>p</i> = .01, .033) abnormality found in mitral regurgitation subgroup. In the SLE group, LA reservoir, bump and conduit strain were significantly positively correlated with LVEF (B = 0.467, <i>p</i> < .001 vs B = 0.019, <i>p</i> = .01 vs B = 0.168, <i>p</i> = .001 vs B = 0.036, <i>p</i> < .001 vs B = 0.020, <i>p</i> = .024). Conduit strain (εe, SRe) was positively correlated with LAEF (B = 0.229, <i>p</i> = .032 vs B = 0.027, <i>p</i> = .008).ConclusionMRI-FT based LA parameters may be considered a helpful tool to evaluate LA function in SLE patients, and LA strain may indicate severity of the cardiac dysfunction in SLE patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"9612033251344983"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251344983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeTo explore left atrial (LA) function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mitral regurgitation assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking (MRI-FT).MethodIn this study, 64 SLE patients (35.0 ± 12.3 years, 49 females) and 50 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (32.1 ± 11.2 years, 32 females) were analyzed. Patients with SLE were further classified into two subgroups according to mitral regurgitation defined by echocardiography: mitral regurgitation subgroup (n = 32) and non-mitral regurgitation subgroup (n = 32). All subjects underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination and SLE patients underwent extra laboratory testing. LA volume and strain parameters were compared among the three groups, and a correlation analysis was further performed between CMR parameters and clinical variables.ResultsPatients in both mitral regurgitation and non-mitral regurgitation subgroups showed higher LAVmin (29.15 ± 7.5, 26.22 ± 8.23 vs 21.68 ± 7.67, p = .003, .026) and LAVimin (17.44,14.9 vs 12.62, p = .002,.046) than healthy control subjects. Abnormal LA reservoir, conduit and bump strain were also observed in SLE patients (all p < .05), with more severe reservoir (p = .006, .031) and bump strain (p = .01, .033) abnormality found in mitral regurgitation subgroup. In the SLE group, LA reservoir, bump and conduit strain were significantly positively correlated with LVEF (B = 0.467, p < .001 vs B = 0.019, p = .01 vs B = 0.168, p = .001 vs B = 0.036, p < .001 vs B = 0.020, p = .024). Conduit strain (εe, SRe) was positively correlated with LAEF (B = 0.229, p = .032 vs B = 0.027, p = .008).ConclusionMRI-FT based LA parameters may be considered a helpful tool to evaluate LA function in SLE patients, and LA strain may indicate severity of the cardiac dysfunction in SLE patients.
目的应用心脏磁共振成像特征跟踪(MRI-FT)评价系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)合并二尖瓣反流患者的左房功能。方法分析64例SLE患者(35.0±12.3岁,女性49例)和50例年龄和性别匹配的健康对照(32.1±11.2岁,女性32例)。根据超声心动图确定的二尖瓣返流情况,将SLE患者进一步分为两组:二尖瓣返流亚组(n = 32)和非二尖瓣返流亚组(n = 32)。所有受试者都进行了心脏磁共振(CMR)检查,SLE患者进行了额外的实验室检查。比较三组间LA体积和应变参数,并进一步分析CMR参数与临床变量之间的相关性。结果二尖瓣反流和非二尖瓣反流亚组患者LAVmin(29.15±7.5,26.22±8.23 vs 21.68±7.67,p = 0.003, 0.026)和LAVimin (17.44,14.9 vs 12.62, p = 0.002, 0.046)均高于正常对照组。SLE患者的LA储层、导管和隆起应变均出现异常(p < 0.05),其中二尖瓣反流亚组的LA储层(p = 0.006、0.031)和隆起应变(p = 0.01、0.033)异常更为严重。SLE组LA储层、肿块和导管应变与LVEF呈显著正相关(B = 0.467, p < 0.001 vs B = 0.019, p = 0.01 vs B = 0.168, p = 0.001 vs B = 0.036, p < 0.001 vs B = 0.020, p = 0.024)。导管应变(εe, SRe)与LAEF呈正相关(B = 0.229, p = 0.032 vs B = 0.027, p = 0.008)。结论基于mri - ft的LA参数可作为评价SLE患者LA功能的有效工具,LA菌株可反映SLE患者心功能障碍的严重程度。
期刊介绍:
The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…