The effect of sex on the cardiopulmonary and neuromuscular response to high-intensity interval exercise.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Hannah K Wilson, Lina Bernert, Padraig Spillane, Emma Squires, Lorna Crawford, Jessica Piasecki, Ross Julian, Eurico N Wilhelm, Kirsty M Hicks, Paul Ansdell
{"title":"The effect of sex on the cardiopulmonary and neuromuscular response to high-intensity interval exercise.","authors":"Hannah K Wilson, Lina Bernert, Padraig Spillane, Emma Squires, Lorna Crawford, Jessica Piasecki, Ross Julian, Eurico N Wilhelm, Kirsty M Hicks, Paul Ansdell","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00306.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex differences exist in the integrative response to exercise; however, these are typically researched during incremental and constant-load exercise. Interval exercise involves high-intensity efforts interspersed with recovery periods to repeatedly stress physiological systems, and it is currently unknown whether the response to this form of exercise differs between sexes. Ten males and 10 females (age: 25 ± 3 yr) completed two experimental visits. First, an incremental treadmill exercise test was performed to obtain submaximal (lactate threshold) and maximal (V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>) data. Thereafter, visit two involved 4 × 3-min running intervals at 90% of the final incremental test velocity (vV̇o<sub>2peak</sub>), with 90-s rest between intervals. Before exercise and after each interval, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), quadriceps potentiated twitch (<i>Q</i><sub>tw.pot</sub>), and voluntary activation (VA) were recorded. The rates of oxygen uptake (V̇o<sub>2</sub>), carbon dioxide production (V̇co<sub>2</sub>), and ventilation (V̇e) were continuously recorded throughout. There was no sex difference in relative V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> (males: 47.2 ± 6.0 vs. females: 44.4 ± 5.8 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.292). When expressed relative to peak values, there were no sex differences in the V̇o<sub>2</sub> or V̇co<sub>2</sub> response to the interval task (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.781). Females had greater V̇e/V̇o<sub>2</sub>, and V̇e/V̇co<sub>2</sub> values during the first (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.034) and second (V̇e/V̇co<sub>2</sub>, <i>P</i> = 0.006) intervals, with a sex × time interaction effect (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.046). There were no sex differences in the reductions in MVC, <i>Q</i><sub>tw.pot</sub>, and VA during the interval task (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.150); however, females had lesser reductions in <i>Q</i><sub>tw.pot</sub> values postexercise (-24 ± 9 vs. -15 ± 8%, <i>P</i> = 0.044). Sex differences exist in the physiological response to interval exercise. Compared with males, females experienced greater hyperpnea during the initial stages, and had lesser decreases in contractile function postexercise.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study determined that males and females differ in the physiological response to high-intensity interval exercise. Specifically, females had poorer ventilatory efficiency during the first half of the task, but greater knee-extensor fatigue resistance following the task. These data build upon previous observations from constant-load exercise, demonstrating that physiological sex differences are observed during an ecologically valid exercise task commonly prescribed by practitioners in clinical and athletic populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":" ","pages":"R123-R133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00306.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sex differences exist in the integrative response to exercise; however, these are typically researched during incremental and constant-load exercise. Interval exercise involves high-intensity efforts interspersed with recovery periods to repeatedly stress physiological systems, and it is currently unknown whether the response to this form of exercise differs between sexes. Ten males and 10 females (age: 25 ± 3 yr) completed two experimental visits. First, an incremental treadmill exercise test was performed to obtain submaximal (lactate threshold) and maximal (V̇o2peak) data. Thereafter, visit two involved 4 × 3-min running intervals at 90% of the final incremental test velocity (vV̇o2peak), with 90-s rest between intervals. Before exercise and after each interval, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), quadriceps potentiated twitch (Qtw.pot), and voluntary activation (VA) were recorded. The rates of oxygen uptake (V̇o2), carbon dioxide production (V̇co2), and ventilation (V̇e) were continuously recorded throughout. There was no sex difference in relative V̇o2peak (males: 47.2 ± 6.0 vs. females: 44.4 ± 5.8 mL·kg-1·min-1, P = 0.292). When expressed relative to peak values, there were no sex differences in the V̇o2 or V̇co2 response to the interval task (P ≥ 0.781). Females had greater V̇e/V̇o2, and V̇e/V̇co2 values during the first (P ≤ 0.034) and second (V̇e/V̇co2, P = 0.006) intervals, with a sex × time interaction effect (P ≤ 0.046). There were no sex differences in the reductions in MVC, Qtw.pot, and VA during the interval task (P ≥ 0.150); however, females had lesser reductions in Qtw.pot values postexercise (-24 ± 9 vs. -15 ± 8%, P = 0.044). Sex differences exist in the physiological response to interval exercise. Compared with males, females experienced greater hyperpnea during the initial stages, and had lesser decreases in contractile function postexercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study determined that males and females differ in the physiological response to high-intensity interval exercise. Specifically, females had poorer ventilatory efficiency during the first half of the task, but greater knee-extensor fatigue resistance following the task. These data build upon previous observations from constant-load exercise, demonstrating that physiological sex differences are observed during an ecologically valid exercise task commonly prescribed by practitioners in clinical and athletic populations.

性别对高强度间歇运动心肺和神经肌肉反应的影响。
性别差异存在于对运动的综合反应中,然而,这些差异通常是在增量和恒定负荷运动中研究的。间歇运动包括高强度的努力,穿插在恢复期,反复刺激生理系统,目前尚不清楚对这种形式的运动的反应是否在性别之间有所不同。10名男性和10名女性(年龄:25±3岁)完成了两次实验访问。首先,进行渐进式跑步机运动试验,以获得亚最大值(乳酸阈值)和最大值(V²峰值)数据。此后,第二次访问涉及4 × 3分钟的运行间隔,以最终增量测试速度的90% (vV²峰值)运行,间隔之间休息90秒。运动前和每次间歇后,记录最大自主收缩(MVC)、股四头肌增强抽搐(Qtw.pot)和自主激活(VA)。在整个过程中连续记录氧气吸收率(V´O2)、二氧化碳产生率(V´CO2)和通气率(V´E)。相对V²峰值(男性:47.2±6.0 ml.kg- 1,女性:44.4±5.8 ml.kg- 1)无性别差异。最低为1,p = 0.292)。当相对于峰值表示时,间隔任务的V´O2或V´CO2反应没有性别差异(p≥0.781)。女性在第1和第2个时段(V’E/V’CO2, p=0.006)具有较高的V’E/V’O2和V’E/V’CO2值,存在性别×时间交互作用效应(p≤0.046)。在MVC, Qtw的减少上没有性别差异。(p≥0.150),但女性在Qtw上的下降幅度较小。运动后的Pot值(-24±9 vs -15±8%,p=0.044)。对间歇运动的生理反应存在性别差异。与男性相比,女性在初始阶段经历了更大的呼吸急促,运动后收缩功能的下降较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
145
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信