{"title":"Uptitration of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Acute Heart Failure: Insight from the PREMIER Study.","authors":"Shunichi Doi, Atsushi Tanaka, Keisuke Kida, Takumi Imai, Yusuke Ueda, Yukiko Nakano, Yoshihisa Kizaki, Daiju Fukuda, Yuya Matsue, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Koichi Node","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigated the effect of uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level within current guideline-directed medical therapy in acute heart failure (AHF).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This was the secondary analysis in the Program Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Admitted Patients with Worsening Heart Failure (PREMIER) study. AHF patients were allocated to switch to Sac/Val or ACEIs/ARBs, and the Sac/Val group was divided into Sac/Val with or without uptitration group (Sac/Val >24/26 mg or ≤24/26 mg twice daily at week 8). The primary endpoint was the proportional change in geometric means of NT-proBNP levels at week 8. A total of 376 patients were included, consistent with the primary analysis in PREMIER. The percent changes in the NT-proBNP level were -51% (Sac/Val with uptitration), -39% (Sac/Val without uptitration), and -32% (ACEIs/ARBs). Their group ratios adjusted for baseline characteristics were 0.72 (Sac/Val with uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.89; P = .002) and 0.93 (Sac/Val without uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13; P = .47). However, the Sac/Val without uptitration group yielded a greater NT-proBNP reduction than the ACEI/ARB group (adjusted ratio of change 0.72, 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; P = .016) in the subgroup of reduced ejection fraction. There were no adverse events associated with Sac/Val uptitration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptitration of Sac/Val therapy yielded a greater NT-proBNP level reduction in AHF patients, but Sac/Val therapy without uptitration also reduced NT-proBNP levels in a subgroup with reduced ejection fraction compared with ACEI/ARB therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.05.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: This study investigated the effect of uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level within current guideline-directed medical therapy in acute heart failure (AHF).
Methods and results: This was the secondary analysis in the Program Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Admitted Patients with Worsening Heart Failure (PREMIER) study. AHF patients were allocated to switch to Sac/Val or ACEIs/ARBs, and the Sac/Val group was divided into Sac/Val with or without uptitration group (Sac/Val >24/26 mg or ≤24/26 mg twice daily at week 8). The primary endpoint was the proportional change in geometric means of NT-proBNP levels at week 8. A total of 376 patients were included, consistent with the primary analysis in PREMIER. The percent changes in the NT-proBNP level were -51% (Sac/Val with uptitration), -39% (Sac/Val without uptitration), and -32% (ACEIs/ARBs). Their group ratios adjusted for baseline characteristics were 0.72 (Sac/Val with uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.89; P = .002) and 0.93 (Sac/Val without uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13; P = .47). However, the Sac/Val without uptitration group yielded a greater NT-proBNP reduction than the ACEI/ARB group (adjusted ratio of change 0.72, 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; P = .016) in the subgroup of reduced ejection fraction. There were no adverse events associated with Sac/Val uptitration.
Conclusions: Uptitration of Sac/Val therapy yielded a greater NT-proBNP level reduction in AHF patients, but Sac/Val therapy without uptitration also reduced NT-proBNP levels in a subgroup with reduced ejection fraction compared with ACEI/ARB therapy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.