An In Vitro Nutritional Evaluation of Mixed Silages of Drought-Impaired Grass and Sugar Beet Pulp With or Without Silage Inoculants

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Theresa Gruber, Claudia Lang, Katerina Fliegerová, Georg Terler, Qendrim Zebeli, Thomas Hartinger
{"title":"An In Vitro Nutritional Evaluation of Mixed Silages of Drought-Impaired Grass and Sugar Beet Pulp With or Without Silage Inoculants","authors":"Theresa Gruber,&nbsp;Claudia Lang,&nbsp;Katerina Fliegerová,&nbsp;Georg Terler,&nbsp;Qendrim Zebeli,&nbsp;Thomas Hartinger","doi":"10.1111/jpn.14092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing droughts adversely affect grasslands, diminishing the availability and quality of forages for ruminants. We have recently shown that mixed ensiling of drought-impaired grass (DIG) with sugar beet pulp (SBP) improved the conservation and feed value of silage. The application of silage additives may further improve the ruminal degradability, which may thereby shape the fermentation and microbiome in the rumen when those silages are tested as part of dairy diets. Therefore, we performed a long-term in vitro nutritional evaluation of diets containing 50% (DM basis) of mixed silages from DIG and SBP, ensiled either with no additive (T_CON) or with anaerobic fungi culture supernatant (25% in DM; T_AF), mixed ruminal fluid (10% in DM; T_RF) or lactic acid bacteria (1% in FM; T_LAB). The data showed a high degradability of all diets (e.g., &gt; 70% for organic matter), though without differences in nutrient degradabilities among treatments (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Fermentation characteristics, such as ruminal pH, short-chain fatty acid profile, and gas production were only marginally affected by the treatments. Isobutyric acid proportion was higher in T_CON than in T_AF (<i>p</i> = 0.01), whereas isovaleric acid proportion was lower in T_LAB than in T_RF (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The analysis of the bacterial community revealed similar diversity and structure across all treatments in both the liquid and solid fraction. Noteworthy, <i>Lactobacillus</i> was among the predominant genera in the liquid fraction, which may have derived from the mixed silages. In conclusion, mixed silages from DIG and SBP as part of a 50% concentrate diet showed high ruminal degradability, but no beneficial impact by the tested silage additives was observed. Hence, under these conditions, their application appears not justified. Our results warrant further in vivo verification, whereby it would be of interest to determine the impact of the applied silage additives in forage-based diets (e.g., &gt; 50% silage in diet DM) in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":"109 3","pages":"766-776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpn.14092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpn.14092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing droughts adversely affect grasslands, diminishing the availability and quality of forages for ruminants. We have recently shown that mixed ensiling of drought-impaired grass (DIG) with sugar beet pulp (SBP) improved the conservation and feed value of silage. The application of silage additives may further improve the ruminal degradability, which may thereby shape the fermentation and microbiome in the rumen when those silages are tested as part of dairy diets. Therefore, we performed a long-term in vitro nutritional evaluation of diets containing 50% (DM basis) of mixed silages from DIG and SBP, ensiled either with no additive (T_CON) or with anaerobic fungi culture supernatant (25% in DM; T_AF), mixed ruminal fluid (10% in DM; T_RF) or lactic acid bacteria (1% in FM; T_LAB). The data showed a high degradability of all diets (e.g., > 70% for organic matter), though without differences in nutrient degradabilities among treatments (p > 0.05). Fermentation characteristics, such as ruminal pH, short-chain fatty acid profile, and gas production were only marginally affected by the treatments. Isobutyric acid proportion was higher in T_CON than in T_AF (p = 0.01), whereas isovaleric acid proportion was lower in T_LAB than in T_RF (p = 0.01). The analysis of the bacterial community revealed similar diversity and structure across all treatments in both the liquid and solid fraction. Noteworthy, Lactobacillus was among the predominant genera in the liquid fraction, which may have derived from the mixed silages. In conclusion, mixed silages from DIG and SBP as part of a 50% concentrate diet showed high ruminal degradability, but no beneficial impact by the tested silage additives was observed. Hence, under these conditions, their application appears not justified. Our results warrant further in vivo verification, whereby it would be of interest to determine the impact of the applied silage additives in forage-based diets (e.g., > 50% silage in diet DM) in future research.

Abstract Image

添加或不添加青贮剂对旱损草与甜菜浆混合青贮的体外营养评价
日益严重的干旱对草原产生不利影响,降低了反刍动物饲料的可得性和质量。近期研究表明,旱草(DIG)与甜菜浆(SBP)混合青贮提高了青贮的保存价值和饲料价值。青贮饲料添加剂的应用可以进一步提高瘤胃的可降解性,从而在将青贮饲料作为奶牛日粮的一部分进行试验时,影响瘤胃的发酵和微生物群。因此,我们对含有50% (DM基础)DIG和SBP混合青贮的饲粮进行了长期的体外营养评估,青贮要么不添加添加剂(T_CON),要么添加厌氧真菌培养上清(25% DM;T_AF),混合瘤胃液(DM中10%;T_RF)或乳酸菌(FM中1%;T_LAB)。数据显示,所有饲粮的降解率都很高(如有机物降解率为70%),但各处理间营养物质降解率无差异(p > 0.05)。发酵特性,如瘤胃pH值、短链脂肪酸谱和产气量仅受些微影响。T_CON组异丁酸比例高于T_AF组(p = 0.01), T_LAB组异戊酸比例低于T_RF组(p = 0.01)。细菌群落的分析显示,在所有处理中,液体和固体部分的细菌群落多样性和结构相似。值得注意的是,乳酸菌是液体部分的优势属之一,可能来自混合青贮。综上所述,在50%精料饲粮中,DIG和SBP混合青贮具有较高的瘤胃降解率,但不同青贮添加剂对瘤胃降解率无显著影响。因此,在这些条件下,它们的应用似乎是不合理的。我们的研究结果需要进一步的体内验证,从而在未来的研究中确定在饲料基础饲粮中添加青贮添加剂(例如,饲粮DM中添加50%青贮)的影响将是有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor. Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient. In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信