Improving Diversity in Recruitment: Lessons Learned During the REACH Pregnancy Circles Pilot Trial

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Octavia Wiseman, Sidera Tahir, Christine McCourt, Anita Mehay, Helliner Robinson, Kade Mondeh, Lorna Sweeney, Meg Wiggins, Mary Sawtell, Angela Harden, the REACH Research Team
{"title":"Improving Diversity in Recruitment: Lessons Learned During the REACH Pregnancy Circles Pilot Trial","authors":"Octavia Wiseman,&nbsp;Sidera Tahir,&nbsp;Christine McCourt,&nbsp;Anita Mehay,&nbsp;Helliner Robinson,&nbsp;Kade Mondeh,&nbsp;Lorna Sweeney,&nbsp;Meg Wiggins,&nbsp;Mary Sawtell,&nbsp;Angela Harden,&nbsp;the REACH Research Team","doi":"10.1111/hex.70300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Our ability to address inequities in health outcomes is hampered by the under-representation of underserved groups in research. Research exploring this topic has focused on observational studies in the American context. This is a pivotal concern for maternity research in the UK as perinatal outcome variables vary by ethnicity, socioeconomic and linguistic background. This paper reports the findings of an analysis of the diversity achieved by different recruitment strategies used within a feasibility study and pilot trial of group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A pilot randomised controlled trial involved implementation of Pregnancy Circles across three maternity services in an area of high ethnic, socioeconomic and linguistic diversity. Following findings of high ethnic diversity but low levels of educational and linguistic diversity amongst participants recruited in our prior feasibility study, equity-informed strategies were put into place to attempt to increase recruitment diversity in the pilot trial, addressing organisational barriers (additional language support); attitudinal barriers (staff training to counteract recruitment bias) and practical barriers (extending the recruitment period to reach women accessing care late). Women who declined participation were invited to complete a short anonymous questionnaire covering demographic details and reasons for declining. The demographic characteristics of participants in the feasibility and pilot studies, and the pilot study decliners, were compared using descriptive statistics and free-text reasons for declining were analysed thematically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The targeted recruitment processes were successful in widening the diversity of participants in this study, in particular for women with limited English proficiency and low educational achievement. Nevertheless, comparison of participants to those who declined showed some barriers persisted. The most common reason to decline was lack of time, most commonly due to caring responsibilities, and this was more likely to be cited by ethnically minoritized women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Recruitment plans focused on widening diversity can be effective but are likely to require additional resources such as funding longer recruitment periods or interpreting services. The gendered nature of maternity research poses particular challenges, and our study suggests that addressing barriers such as those around childcare would enhance the recruitment of socio-economically deprived and minoritized women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Our study team included two service user representatives as co-investigators, feeding into all aspects of the study. The focus of the work reported here was to increase the participation of underserved communities in the pilot trial and to inform the Pregnancy Circles RCT, to enable them to contribute their data and lived experience to the findings and evaluation of this intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Due to an administrative oversight, trial registration for this pilot trial was applied for during the 6-week recruitment period, rather than before recruitment commencing (ISRCTN66925258. Retrospectively registered 3 April 2017). Registration occurred before programme intervention, outcomes and process data collection and all data analysis</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Our ability to address inequities in health outcomes is hampered by the under-representation of underserved groups in research. Research exploring this topic has focused on observational studies in the American context. This is a pivotal concern for maternity research in the UK as perinatal outcome variables vary by ethnicity, socioeconomic and linguistic background. This paper reports the findings of an analysis of the diversity achieved by different recruitment strategies used within a feasibility study and pilot trial of group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles).

Method

A pilot randomised controlled trial involved implementation of Pregnancy Circles across three maternity services in an area of high ethnic, socioeconomic and linguistic diversity. Following findings of high ethnic diversity but low levels of educational and linguistic diversity amongst participants recruited in our prior feasibility study, equity-informed strategies were put into place to attempt to increase recruitment diversity in the pilot trial, addressing organisational barriers (additional language support); attitudinal barriers (staff training to counteract recruitment bias) and practical barriers (extending the recruitment period to reach women accessing care late). Women who declined participation were invited to complete a short anonymous questionnaire covering demographic details and reasons for declining. The demographic characteristics of participants in the feasibility and pilot studies, and the pilot study decliners, were compared using descriptive statistics and free-text reasons for declining were analysed thematically.

Results

The targeted recruitment processes were successful in widening the diversity of participants in this study, in particular for women with limited English proficiency and low educational achievement. Nevertheless, comparison of participants to those who declined showed some barriers persisted. The most common reason to decline was lack of time, most commonly due to caring responsibilities, and this was more likely to be cited by ethnically minoritized women.

Conclusion

Recruitment plans focused on widening diversity can be effective but are likely to require additional resources such as funding longer recruitment periods or interpreting services. The gendered nature of maternity research poses particular challenges, and our study suggests that addressing barriers such as those around childcare would enhance the recruitment of socio-economically deprived and minoritized women.

Patient or Public Contribution

Our study team included two service user representatives as co-investigators, feeding into all aspects of the study. The focus of the work reported here was to increase the participation of underserved communities in the pilot trial and to inform the Pregnancy Circles RCT, to enable them to contribute their data and lived experience to the findings and evaluation of this intervention.

Trial Registration

Due to an administrative oversight, trial registration for this pilot trial was applied for during the 6-week recruitment period, rather than before recruitment commencing (ISRCTN66925258. Retrospectively registered 3 April 2017). Registration occurred before programme intervention, outcomes and process data collection and all data analysis

Abstract Image

提高招聘的多样性:在REACH妊娠圈试点试验中获得的经验教训
我们解决健康结果不平等问题的能力受到研究中服务不足群体代表性不足的阻碍。探索这一主题的研究主要集中在美国背景下的观察性研究。这是英国产科研究的一个关键问题,因为围产期结果变量因种族、社会经济和语言背景而异。本文报告了在可行性研究和群体产前护理(妊娠圈)试点试验中使用的不同招聘策略所实现的多样性分析结果。方法一项试点随机对照试验涉及在种族、社会经济和语言高度多样化的地区在三家产科服务机构实施妊娠圈。在我们之前的可行性研究中,我们发现参与者的种族多样性很高,但教育和语言多样性水平很低,因此我们实施了公平告知策略,试图在试点试验中增加招聘多样性,解决组织障碍(额外的语言支持);态度障碍(对工作人员进行培训以消除招聘偏见)和实际障碍(延长招聘期以覆盖获得护理的较晚妇女)。拒绝参与的妇女被邀请完成一份简短的匿名调查问卷,包括人口统计细节和拒绝的原因。使用描述性统计比较了可行性研究和试点研究参与者的人口特征,以及试点研究的下降,并对下降的自由文本原因进行了专题分析。结果有针对性的招聘过程成功地扩大了本研究参与者的多样性,特别是对于英语水平有限和教育程度较低的女性。然而,参与者与那些拒绝的人的比较表明,一些障碍仍然存在。最常见的原因是缺乏时间,最常见的原因是照顾责任,这更有可能被少数族裔女性引用。专注于扩大多样性的招聘计划可能有效,但可能需要额外的资源,如资助更长的招聘期或口译服务。妇产研究的性别性质带来了特殊的挑战,我们的研究表明,解决诸如儿童保育等障碍将增加对社会经济贫困和少数民族妇女的招募。我们的研究团队包括两名服务用户代表作为共同调查人员,参与研究的各个方面。这里报告的工作重点是增加服务不足社区对试点试验的参与,并告知妊娠圈RCT,使他们能够为这项干预的发现和评估提供数据和生活经验。由于行政监督,该试点试验的试验注册在6周的招募期间申请,而不是在招募开始之前申请(ISRCTN66925258)。回顾性注册于2017年4月3日)。 登记发生在方案干预、结果和过程数据收集以及所有数据分析之前
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信