Dialogical Consent Practices in Research With 2S-LGBTQ+ Youth

Sandra Jeppesen, Iowyth Ulthiin, Emily Faubert, Kyra Min Poole, Dale Boyle
{"title":"Dialogical Consent Practices in Research With 2S-LGBTQ+ Youth","authors":"Sandra Jeppesen,&nbsp;Iowyth Ulthiin,&nbsp;Emily Faubert,&nbsp;Kyra Min Poole,&nbsp;Dale Boyle","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The limits of research consent processes come into quick relief when researching with marginalized youth, limits we have tested and contested in a research partnership with LU and GC in Canada. LU is a horizontal research collective, while GC is a 2S-LGBTQ+ non-profit. Together we initiated a project in 2022 to study Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) practices with community organizations, developing a series of youth workshops. We grounded our ethics protocol in GC's everyday consent practices in work with youth, including candid conversations about power, intersectionality, respect, identity, and language. We co-developed a video consent process to facilitate youth self-consent in the workshops. While parents, guardians, or caregivers often must consent on behalf of youth, this may pose risks for 2S-LGBTQ+ youth in non-affirming homes and may further deepen their alienation or exclude them from participation. Importantly, GC does not require parental, guardian, or caregiver consent for accessing their services but provides for youth self-consent. Youth self-consent, moreover, is supported by human rights, educational, and social work practices. GC's consent practices were integrated into our research including our ethics protocol. Our findings identify both challenges in having self-consent accepted by the REB, the precarity of nonprofits and long-term community-engaged research with short-term funding; and successes in strong community relationships, interviews, and innovative methodologies. We propose a methodological framework for dialogical youth self-consent that can support intersectional 2S-LGBTQ+ youth access to participation in research, in turn supporting paths to agency through expressing their ideas and perspectives. Moreover, we foreground consent as being continuously negotiated and reaffirmed in dialogue with 2S-LGBTQ+ youth themselves, highlighting the transformative potential of participatory self-consent processes for youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The limits of research consent processes come into quick relief when researching with marginalized youth, limits we have tested and contested in a research partnership with LU and GC in Canada. LU is a horizontal research collective, while GC is a 2S-LGBTQ+ non-profit. Together we initiated a project in 2022 to study Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) practices with community organizations, developing a series of youth workshops. We grounded our ethics protocol in GC's everyday consent practices in work with youth, including candid conversations about power, intersectionality, respect, identity, and language. We co-developed a video consent process to facilitate youth self-consent in the workshops. While parents, guardians, or caregivers often must consent on behalf of youth, this may pose risks for 2S-LGBTQ+ youth in non-affirming homes and may further deepen their alienation or exclude them from participation. Importantly, GC does not require parental, guardian, or caregiver consent for accessing their services but provides for youth self-consent. Youth self-consent, moreover, is supported by human rights, educational, and social work practices. GC's consent practices were integrated into our research including our ethics protocol. Our findings identify both challenges in having self-consent accepted by the REB, the precarity of nonprofits and long-term community-engaged research with short-term funding; and successes in strong community relationships, interviews, and innovative methodologies. We propose a methodological framework for dialogical youth self-consent that can support intersectional 2S-LGBTQ+ youth access to participation in research, in turn supporting paths to agency through expressing their ideas and perspectives. Moreover, we foreground consent as being continuously negotiated and reaffirmed in dialogue with 2S-LGBTQ+ youth themselves, highlighting the transformative potential of participatory self-consent processes for youth.

s - lgbtq +青年研究中的对话性同意实践
在对边缘青年进行研究时,研究同意过程的限制迅速得到缓解,我们在与加拿大的卢和GC的研究合作中对这些限制进行了测试和质疑。LU是一个横向研究团体,而GC是一个2S-LGBTQ+非营利组织。我们在2022年共同启动了一个项目,与社区组织一起研究公平、多元化和包容(EDI)的做法,并举办了一系列青年讲习班。我们将道德规范建立在GC与年轻人一起工作的日常同意实践中,包括关于权力、交叉性、尊重、身份和语言的坦诚对话。我们合作开发了一个视频同意程序,以方便青年在工作坊中自我同意。虽然父母、监护人或照顾者通常必须代表青少年同意,但这可能会给生活在非肯定家庭中的2S-LGBTQ+青少年带来风险,并可能进一步加深他们的疏远或将他们排除在参与之外。重要的是,GC不需要父母、监护人或照顾者的同意来访问他们的服务,而是提供青少年自我同意。此外,青年的自我同意得到了人权、教育和社会工作实践的支持。GC的同意实践被整合到我们的研究中,包括我们的伦理协议。我们的研究发现了让REB接受自我同意的挑战,非营利组织和短期资助的长期社区参与研究的不稳定性;在强大的社区关系、访谈和创新方法方面取得成功。我们提出了一个对话青年自我同意的方法框架,可以支持交叉的2S-LGBTQ+青年参与研究,反过来通过表达他们的想法和观点来支持机构的路径。此外,我们还强调,在与2S-LGBTQ+青年本身的对话中,同意是不断协商和重申的,强调了参与式自我同意过程对青年的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信