Moisturizing Treatment Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Skin, Associated With the Presence or Absence of Dermatoporosis

Juliana Rodrigues Pinto, Silas Arandas Monteiro e Silva, Gislaine Ricci Leonardi
{"title":"Moisturizing Treatment Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Skin, Associated With the Presence or Absence of Dermatoporosis","authors":"Juliana Rodrigues Pinto,&nbsp;Silas Arandas Monteiro e Silva,&nbsp;Gislaine Ricci Leonardi","doi":"10.1002/der2.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Skin disorders are highly common in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus patients. This study assessed the effects of a moisturizing formulation on photoprotected (volar forearm) and photoexposed (dorsal hand) skin in diabetic and nondiabetic participants, with or without stage I dermatoporosis, comparing it to a reference product.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty participants, aged 61–81 years, were included and equally divided into diabetic and nondiabetic groups. Biophysical assessments, including capacitance (hydration), transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements, and skin micro-imaging for roughness evaluation, were performed at baseline, 45, and 60 days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The test formulation significantly increased skin hydration, up to 34% on the forearm (FO) and 35% on the dorsal hand (DH) in diabetic participants, and up to 21% on the FO and 27% on the DH in nondiabetic participants. TEWL reduction, indicating improved barrier function, was more pronounced in diabetics (8% on FO and DH), while non-diabetics showed a 1% reduction on the FO. Skin roughness decreased more in diabetics (16% on FO and 18% on DH) than in non-diabetics (11% on DH). Diabetic participants showed greater improvements overall. The test formulation and the reference product demonstrated similar effects in improving skin condition. Participants with stage I dermatoporosis showed significant improvements in skin condition, with the test formulation providing greater benefits for diabetics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The test formulation effectively enhanced skin hydration and barrier function while reducing skin roughness in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, regardless of dermatoporosis diagnosis. These findings offer valuable guidance for developing targeted skincare treatments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100366,"journal":{"name":"Dermatological Reviews","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/der2.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/der2.70037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Skin disorders are highly common in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus patients. This study assessed the effects of a moisturizing formulation on photoprotected (volar forearm) and photoexposed (dorsal hand) skin in diabetic and nondiabetic participants, with or without stage I dermatoporosis, comparing it to a reference product.

Methods

Thirty participants, aged 61–81 years, were included and equally divided into diabetic and nondiabetic groups. Biophysical assessments, including capacitance (hydration), transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements, and skin micro-imaging for roughness evaluation, were performed at baseline, 45, and 60 days.

Results

The test formulation significantly increased skin hydration, up to 34% on the forearm (FO) and 35% on the dorsal hand (DH) in diabetic participants, and up to 21% on the FO and 27% on the DH in nondiabetic participants. TEWL reduction, indicating improved barrier function, was more pronounced in diabetics (8% on FO and DH), while non-diabetics showed a 1% reduction on the FO. Skin roughness decreased more in diabetics (16% on FO and 18% on DH) than in non-diabetics (11% on DH). Diabetic participants showed greater improvements overall. The test formulation and the reference product demonstrated similar effects in improving skin condition. Participants with stage I dermatoporosis showed significant improvements in skin condition, with the test formulation providing greater benefits for diabetics.

Conclusion

The test formulation effectively enhanced skin hydration and barrier function while reducing skin roughness in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, regardless of dermatoporosis diagnosis. These findings offer valuable guidance for developing targeted skincare treatments.

保湿治疗结果:糖尿病和非糖尿病皮肤的比较研究,与存在或不存在皮肤疏松症有关
背景皮肤疾病在1型和2型糖尿病患者中非常常见。本研究评估了一种保湿配方对糖尿病和非糖尿病参与者(伴有或不伴有I期皮肤疏松症)光保护(前臂掌侧)和光暴露(手背)皮肤的影响,并将其与参考产品进行比较。方法将30例年龄在61 ~ 81岁之间的参与者平均分为糖尿病组和非糖尿病组。在基线、45天和60天进行生物物理评估,包括电容(水合作用)、经皮失水(TEWL)测量和用于粗糙度评估的皮肤微成像。结果测试配方显著增加皮肤水合作用,糖尿病参与者的前臂(FO)和手背(DH)分别增加34%和35%,非糖尿病参与者的手背和手背分别增加21%和27%。TEWL减少,表明屏障功能的改善,在糖尿病患者中更为明显(FO和DH为8%),而非糖尿病患者的FO为1%。糖尿病患者的皮肤粗糙度比非糖尿病患者下降更多(FO组16%,DH组18%)(DH组11%)。糖尿病参与者总体上表现出更大的改善。试验配方和参考产品在改善皮肤状况方面表现出相似的效果。患有I期皮肤疏松症的参与者表现出皮肤状况的显著改善,试验配方为糖尿病患者提供了更大的益处。结论该试验配方在糖尿病和非糖尿病受试者中,不论是否患有皮肤病,均能有效增强皮肤水分和屏障功能,同时降低皮肤粗糙度。这些发现为开发有针对性的护肤治疗提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信