The redistributive impacts of the Brazilian 2019 pension reform on individual pension indicators for Brazilian civil servants

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Ana Cristina de Souza Queiroz, Luís Eduardo Afonso
{"title":"The redistributive impacts of the Brazilian 2019 pension reform on individual pension indicators for Brazilian civil servants","authors":"Ana Cristina de Souza Queiroz,&nbsp;Luís Eduardo Afonso","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the redistributive effects of the 2019 reform on the benefits of Brazil's federal public service pension scheme for old-age and survivors' benefits. We developed an actuarial model to compare the <i>Current Situation</i> (which applies to those who entered public service from 2020 onward) with the three cohorts under the <i>Old Situation</i> (those who joined before 2004, those who joined between 2004 and 2012, and those who joined between 2013 and 2019). We calculated four pension indicators, breaking down the results by gender, as well as teaching and non-teaching staff. The reforms led to reductions in both replacement rates and required rates. Additionally, the internal rates of return decreased, while effective rates increased. Women and teachers were the most negatively affected by these changes. The composition of required rates between old-age and survivors' pensions has also shifted. Overall, the reforms diminished the redistributive characteristics and the adequacy while increasing their equity and progressivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the redistributive effects of the 2019 reform on the benefits of Brazil's federal public service pension scheme for old-age and survivors' benefits. We developed an actuarial model to compare the Current Situation (which applies to those who entered public service from 2020 onward) with the three cohorts under the Old Situation (those who joined before 2004, those who joined between 2004 and 2012, and those who joined between 2013 and 2019). We calculated four pension indicators, breaking down the results by gender, as well as teaching and non-teaching staff. The reforms led to reductions in both replacement rates and required rates. Additionally, the internal rates of return decreased, while effective rates increased. Women and teachers were the most negatively affected by these changes. The composition of required rates between old-age and survivors' pensions has also shifted. Overall, the reforms diminished the redistributive characteristics and the adequacy while increasing their equity and progressivity.

Abstract Image

巴西2019年养老金改革对巴西公务员个人养老金指标的再分配影响
本文研究了2019年改革对巴西联邦公共服务养老金计划福利和遗属福利的再分配影响。我们开发了一个精算模型,将当前情况(适用于2020年以后进入公共服务部门的人)与旧情况下的三个队列(2004年之前加入的人,2004年至2012年加入的人,以及2013年至2019年加入的人)进行比较。我们计算了四项养老金指标,按性别、教学人员和非教学人员进行了分类。改革导致替代率和所需率都有所下降。此外,内部收益率下降,而有效收益率上升。妇女和教师受这些变化的负面影响最大。老年人和遗属养老金之间的要求比率构成也发生了变化。总的来说,这些改革减少了再分配的特点和充分性,同时增加了它们的公平性和累进性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信