Living on sand. A functional and PDSM analysis of obsidian and other volcanic rock tools from two coastal settlements: Playa Chica and Dunas de Maspalomas (Gran Canaria, Spain)

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Idaira Brito-Abrante, Laurence Astruc, Jonathan Santana, Jacob Morales, Amelia Rodríguez-Rodríguez
{"title":"Living on sand. A functional and PDSM analysis of obsidian and other volcanic rock tools from two coastal settlements: Playa Chica and Dunas de Maspalomas (Gran Canaria, Spain)","authors":"Idaira Brito-Abrante,&nbsp;Laurence Astruc,&nbsp;Jonathan Santana,&nbsp;Jacob Morales,&nbsp;Amelia Rodríguez-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02245-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The state of the surfaces of prehistoric stone tools must be assessed before initiating traceological research as they may have suffered from post-depositional surface modifications (PDSM) stemming from sediment and aeolian abrasion and trampling that could have eliminated their original use-wear traces. PDSM research not only serves to avoid misinterpreting the use-wear but can shed light on formation processes of archaeological sites. Recognising these modifications helps determine the choice of which stones to study, especially in the case of industrial volcanic rock assemblages where use-wear analyses require a deep understanding of their physical characteristics. Observations of tools from two coastal indigenous settlements on the Island of Gran Canaria, notably Playa Chica (sixth-thirteenth centuries AD) and Dunas de Maspalomas (eighth-eleventh centuries AD), reveal the problems of identifying the use-wear in the framework of activities carried out in open, sandy environments. Moreover, the composition and granulometry of the sands of each site differ. The objective of this study is thus to identify the effects of the mechanical alterations provoked by these sands on the macro and micro use-wear of the different archaeological tools hewn from obsidian and other volcanic rocks. This was carried out by means of a programme of experimentation involving knapping a series of tools of both obsidian and other volcanic rocks, working them with different types of contact materials (animal and plant) to observe their use-wear, and ultimately simulate the PDSM they suffered in a vibration device using sand samples collected at each of the two sites. The findings shed new light on the post-depositional taphonomic alterations affecting the surfaces and use-wear of archaeological volcanic rocks tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12520-025-02245-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02245-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The state of the surfaces of prehistoric stone tools must be assessed before initiating traceological research as they may have suffered from post-depositional surface modifications (PDSM) stemming from sediment and aeolian abrasion and trampling that could have eliminated their original use-wear traces. PDSM research not only serves to avoid misinterpreting the use-wear but can shed light on formation processes of archaeological sites. Recognising these modifications helps determine the choice of which stones to study, especially in the case of industrial volcanic rock assemblages where use-wear analyses require a deep understanding of their physical characteristics. Observations of tools from two coastal indigenous settlements on the Island of Gran Canaria, notably Playa Chica (sixth-thirteenth centuries AD) and Dunas de Maspalomas (eighth-eleventh centuries AD), reveal the problems of identifying the use-wear in the framework of activities carried out in open, sandy environments. Moreover, the composition and granulometry of the sands of each site differ. The objective of this study is thus to identify the effects of the mechanical alterations provoked by these sands on the macro and micro use-wear of the different archaeological tools hewn from obsidian and other volcanic rocks. This was carried out by means of a programme of experimentation involving knapping a series of tools of both obsidian and other volcanic rocks, working them with different types of contact materials (animal and plant) to observe their use-wear, and ultimately simulate the PDSM they suffered in a vibration device using sand samples collected at each of the two sites. The findings shed new light on the post-depositional taphonomic alterations affecting the surfaces and use-wear of archaeological volcanic rocks tools.

生活在沙滩上。来自两个沿海聚落Playa Chica和Dunas de Maspalomas(西班牙大加那利岛)的黑曜石和其他火山岩工具的功能和PDSM分析
在开始痕迹研究之前,必须对史前石器的表面状态进行评估,因为它们可能遭受了沉积后表面修饰(PDSM),这些修饰是由沉积物和风成的磨损和践踏引起的,可能会消除它们最初的使用磨损痕迹。PDSM研究不仅可以避免对使用磨损的误解,而且可以揭示考古遗址的形成过程。认识到这些变化有助于确定要研究的岩石的选择,特别是在工业火山岩组合的情况下,使用磨损分析需要对其物理特性有深入的了解。对大加那利岛两个沿海土著定居点,特别是Playa Chica(公元6 - 13世纪)和Dunas de Maspalomas(公元8 - 11世纪)的工具的观察,揭示了在开放的沙质环境中进行活动的框架内识别使用磨损的问题。此外,每个地点的沙的组成和粒度也不同。因此,本研究的目的是确定这些砂引起的机械变化对从黑曜石和其他火山岩中凿出的不同考古工具的宏观和微观使用磨损的影响。这是通过一个实验项目来进行的,包括使用一系列黑曜石和其他火山岩的工具,与不同类型的接触材料(动物和植物)一起工作,观察它们的使用磨损,并最终使用在两个地点收集的沙子样本在振动装置中模拟它们所遭受的PDSM。这一发现揭示了影响考古火山岩工具表面和使用磨损的沉积后地貌学变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信