‘We're Not Really Into Helping, We're Into Being Useful’: Service Provider Practices That Support Belonging Opportunities in the Lives of Adults Labelled With Intellectual Disabilities

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Paige Reeves, David McConnell, Shanon K. Phelan
{"title":"‘We're Not Really Into Helping, We're Into Being Useful’: Service Provider Practices That Support Belonging Opportunities in the Lives of Adults Labelled With Intellectual Disabilities","authors":"Paige Reeves,&nbsp;David McConnell,&nbsp;Shanon K. Phelan","doi":"10.1111/jar.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Social inclusion focussed on belonging is increasingly emphasised by disability advocates and policymakers, yet belonging often remains absent for adults labelled with intellectual disabilities. People labelled with intellectual disabilities often rely on service providers to support their belonging.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this critically informed ethnographic work, we draw on interviews with nine disability services leaders and prolonged participatory field explorations with five adults labelled with intellectual disabilities, their friends and support workers to explore how service providers support opportunities for belonging.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Reflexive thematic analysis generated three themes: centering inclusion, belonging and rights; creating opportunities for self-exploration and ‘dreaming’; and facilitating connections to people and place.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight supporting belonging as complex work that requires a relational understanding of autonomy, work environments that support reflexivity, and the redistribution of resources to allow for higher staff wages, larger individual support contracts and funding for staff training and post-secondary education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Social inclusion focussed on belonging is increasingly emphasised by disability advocates and policymakers, yet belonging often remains absent for adults labelled with intellectual disabilities. People labelled with intellectual disabilities often rely on service providers to support their belonging.

Methods

In this critically informed ethnographic work, we draw on interviews with nine disability services leaders and prolonged participatory field explorations with five adults labelled with intellectual disabilities, their friends and support workers to explore how service providers support opportunities for belonging.

Results

Reflexive thematic analysis generated three themes: centering inclusion, belonging and rights; creating opportunities for self-exploration and ‘dreaming’; and facilitating connections to people and place.

Conclusions

Findings highlight supporting belonging as complex work that requires a relational understanding of autonomy, work environments that support reflexivity, and the redistribution of resources to allow for higher staff wages, larger individual support contracts and funding for staff training and post-secondary education.

“我们不是真的在帮助,我们是在做有用的人”:服务提供者的做法,支持有智力障碍的成年人在生活中获得归属机会
残疾倡导者和政策制定者越来越强调以归属感为重点的社会包容,但对于被贴上智力残疾标签的成年人来说,归属感往往仍然缺失。被贴上智力残疾标签的人往往依靠服务提供者来支持他们的归属。在这篇批判性的民族志工作中,我们采访了9位残疾人服务机构的负责人,并对5位被标记为智障的成年人、他们的朋友和支持工作者进行了长时间的参与性实地考察,以探讨服务提供者如何支持归属感的机会。结果反身性主题分析生成三个主题:以包容、归属和权利为中心;创造自我探索和“梦想”的机会;并促进与人和地方的联系。研究结果强调,支持归属感是一项复杂的工作,需要对自主性的关系理解,支持反身性的工作环境,以及资源的再分配,以允许更高的员工工资,更大的个人支持合同以及为员工培训和高等教育提供资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信