Assessment of emergency department physician perspectives on people with functional seizures

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Mackenzi Moore, Meagan Watson, Laura Strom
{"title":"Assessment of emergency department physician perspectives on people with functional seizures","authors":"Mackenzi Moore,&nbsp;Meagan Watson,&nbsp;Laura Strom","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>People with Functional Seizures (PwFS) often face stigma and mismanagement in the emergency department (ED), which may include misdiagnosis, unnecessary treatment, and delayed care [<span><span>1</span></span>]. Negative biases among providers may contribute to these challenges, affecting patient outcomes. This study examines explicit and implicit stigma toward functional seizures (FS) among ED physicians to identify factors that reduce bias and inform strategies for improving care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>40 ED physicians were recruited via email to complete a 15-minute Qualtrics survey. This survey asked participants about their perspectives of PwFS. Questions were based on a previously validated stigma questionnaire, the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC). This was followed by an Implicit Association Test (IAT), which assessed participant’s subconscious biases towards FS compared with other behavioral health disorders. Of the 40 participants, 25 completed the IAT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Responses reflected mixed implicit and explicit attitudes. Explicitly, while participants acknowledged negative reactions toward PwFS, they rejected beliefs that PwFS lack effort and supported advocacy, indicating generally positive explicit attitudes.<!--> <!-->Implicitly, 56% of IAT respondents demonstrated negative bias towards FS, though average scores did not significantly differ from neutrality. Lower implicit bias was observed among those treating both pediatric and adult patients and those with moderate FS patient exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These findings reflect a complex picture of provider attitudes, with explicit support for PwFS coexisting alongside some indications of implicit bias. Variability in implicit responses by patient exposure and clinical scope suggests that provider experiences may influence underlying attitudes towards FS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 110494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025002331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

People with Functional Seizures (PwFS) often face stigma and mismanagement in the emergency department (ED), which may include misdiagnosis, unnecessary treatment, and delayed care [1]. Negative biases among providers may contribute to these challenges, affecting patient outcomes. This study examines explicit and implicit stigma toward functional seizures (FS) among ED physicians to identify factors that reduce bias and inform strategies for improving care.

Methods

40 ED physicians were recruited via email to complete a 15-minute Qualtrics survey. This survey asked participants about their perspectives of PwFS. Questions were based on a previously validated stigma questionnaire, the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC). This was followed by an Implicit Association Test (IAT), which assessed participant’s subconscious biases towards FS compared with other behavioral health disorders. Of the 40 participants, 25 completed the IAT.

Results

Responses reflected mixed implicit and explicit attitudes. Explicitly, while participants acknowledged negative reactions toward PwFS, they rejected beliefs that PwFS lack effort and supported advocacy, indicating generally positive explicit attitudes. Implicitly, 56% of IAT respondents demonstrated negative bias towards FS, though average scores did not significantly differ from neutrality. Lower implicit bias was observed among those treating both pediatric and adult patients and those with moderate FS patient exposure.

Discussion

These findings reflect a complex picture of provider attitudes, with explicit support for PwFS coexisting alongside some indications of implicit bias. Variability in implicit responses by patient exposure and clinical scope suggests that provider experiences may influence underlying attitudes towards FS.
评估急诊科医师对功能性癫痫患者的看法
背景与目的功能性癫痫发作(PwFS)患者在急诊科(ED)经常面临耻辱和管理不当,其中可能包括误诊、不必要的治疗和延迟护理[10]。提供者之间的负面偏见可能会导致这些挑战,影响患者的预后。本研究考察了急诊科医生对功能性癫痫发作(FS)的显性和隐性耻辱感,以确定减少偏见的因素,并为改善护理提供策略。方法通过电子邮件招募40名急诊科医生完成15分钟的质量调查。是项调查询问受访者对PwFS的看法。问题基于先前验证的病耻感问卷,即卫生保健提供者开放思想病耻感量表(OMS-HC)。随后进行内隐联想测试(IAT),评估参与者对FS和其他行为健康障碍的潜意识偏见。在40名参与者中,有25人完成了IAT测试。结果受访学生的态度有内隐的也有外显的。明确地,虽然参与者承认对PwFS的负面反应,但他们拒绝认为PwFS缺乏努力并支持宣传,表明普遍积极的显性态度。隐含地,56%的IAT受访者表现出对FS的负面偏见,尽管平均得分与中立没有显着差异。在治疗儿童和成人患者以及中度FS患者暴露的患者中,观察到较低的内隐偏倚。这些发现反映了提供者态度的复杂情况,对PwFS的明确支持与一些隐性偏见并存。患者接触和临床范围的内隐反应的可变性表明,提供者的经验可能影响对FS的潜在态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信