{"title":"Calibrating the rainfall erosivity of high-resolution calculation and low-resolution estimation approaches in karst areas of southwest China","authors":"Lu Zhai , Teng Feng , Yuemin Yue , Kelin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rainfall erosivity describes the capacity of rainfall to cause soil erosion in unprotected fields. The calculation methods show regional variations influenced by climate and terrain. In humid karst region characterized by soluble carbonate rock, widespread underground pores and fissures lead to high rainfall acceptance. Only during heavy rainstorms may rainfall exceed the absorption capacity of soil and underground channels, resulting in surface runoff and soil erosion. However, controversy exists about rainfall erosivity criteria based on high-resolution rainfall data (1–60 min) and lack of localized estimated models based on low-resolution rainfall data (day, month, year) in the karst areas of southwest China. Therefore, 63 erosive events from five fallow plots were collected to determine the erosive rainfall criteria. Subsequently, hourly rainfall data spanning 42 years from six meteorological stations were analyzed to determine the erosive daily rainfall standard. Finally, four commonly used estimated rainfall erosivity model parameters were calibrated for each station and the region. The results showed that the erosive rainfall criteria are determined by multiplying the event rainfall amount by the maximum 30-minute intensity of 146 mm<sup>2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>, or by a rainfall amount of 20 mm. The erosive daily rainfall standard was 16.5 mm. The daily rainfall power function incorporating seasonal changes (Model 2) outperformed at each station, with average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.73 and 0.89 for daily and monthly rainfall erosivity, respectively. The daily rainfall power function (Model 1 (region)) at the regional scale performed best. Our results showed that the model parameters used in non-karst areas have overestimated rainfall erosivity for karst areas due to the low erosive rainfall standard. This study emphasizes the importance of using localized erosive rainfall standards and localized estimated model parameters for karst areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109174"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622500476X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rainfall erosivity describes the capacity of rainfall to cause soil erosion in unprotected fields. The calculation methods show regional variations influenced by climate and terrain. In humid karst region characterized by soluble carbonate rock, widespread underground pores and fissures lead to high rainfall acceptance. Only during heavy rainstorms may rainfall exceed the absorption capacity of soil and underground channels, resulting in surface runoff and soil erosion. However, controversy exists about rainfall erosivity criteria based on high-resolution rainfall data (1–60 min) and lack of localized estimated models based on low-resolution rainfall data (day, month, year) in the karst areas of southwest China. Therefore, 63 erosive events from five fallow plots were collected to determine the erosive rainfall criteria. Subsequently, hourly rainfall data spanning 42 years from six meteorological stations were analyzed to determine the erosive daily rainfall standard. Finally, four commonly used estimated rainfall erosivity model parameters were calibrated for each station and the region. The results showed that the erosive rainfall criteria are determined by multiplying the event rainfall amount by the maximum 30-minute intensity of 146 mm2 h−1, or by a rainfall amount of 20 mm. The erosive daily rainfall standard was 16.5 mm. The daily rainfall power function incorporating seasonal changes (Model 2) outperformed at each station, with average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.73 and 0.89 for daily and monthly rainfall erosivity, respectively. The daily rainfall power function (Model 1 (region)) at the regional scale performed best. Our results showed that the model parameters used in non-karst areas have overestimated rainfall erosivity for karst areas due to the low erosive rainfall standard. This study emphasizes the importance of using localized erosive rainfall standards and localized estimated model parameters for karst areas.
期刊介绍:
Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment.
Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.