Vietnamese fishers' perceptions on the effects of abandoned, lost, and discarded fishing gear and their willingness to participate in retrieval efforts
Quach Thi Khanh Ngoc , Alena Mychkova , Nguyen Thi Ngan , Pham Quoc Hung , Thomas Potempa , Max Patrick Ehleben
{"title":"Vietnamese fishers' perceptions on the effects of abandoned, lost, and discarded fishing gear and their willingness to participate in retrieval efforts","authors":"Quach Thi Khanh Ngoc , Alena Mychkova , Nguyen Thi Ngan , Pham Quoc Hung , Thomas Potempa , Max Patrick Ehleben","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Abandoned, Lost, or Otherwise Discarded Fishing Gear (ALDFG) is a global challenge, that adversely impacts both marine ecosystems and the livelihood of fishers. This study explores the fishers’ perceptions and concerns regarding ALDFG consequences, and investigates how these concerns shape their willingness to participate in retrieval efforts. Data were collected through a survey of 525 fishers in Khanh Hoa province, Vietnam. Using ordered logit and binary logit analyses, our results indicate that Vietnamese fishers' concerns about ALDFG are significantly influenced by their perceptions of the broader consequences of marine litter. These heightened concerns subsequently lead to a greater willingness among fishers to engage in retrieval efforts. Additionally, our findings suggest that fishers who have experienced direct economic or operational losses due to ALDFG, such as damages to their catch or gear, are more inclined to take part in retrieval activities. It is recommended that targeted awareness campaigns, incentive programs, and waste management systems should be implemented to address not only the environmental impacts but also enhance the economic benefits of retrieval efforts, thereby encouraging greater participation among fishers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 106765"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25001800","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abandoned, Lost, or Otherwise Discarded Fishing Gear (ALDFG) is a global challenge, that adversely impacts both marine ecosystems and the livelihood of fishers. This study explores the fishers’ perceptions and concerns regarding ALDFG consequences, and investigates how these concerns shape their willingness to participate in retrieval efforts. Data were collected through a survey of 525 fishers in Khanh Hoa province, Vietnam. Using ordered logit and binary logit analyses, our results indicate that Vietnamese fishers' concerns about ALDFG are significantly influenced by their perceptions of the broader consequences of marine litter. These heightened concerns subsequently lead to a greater willingness among fishers to engage in retrieval efforts. Additionally, our findings suggest that fishers who have experienced direct economic or operational losses due to ALDFG, such as damages to their catch or gear, are more inclined to take part in retrieval activities. It is recommended that targeted awareness campaigns, incentive programs, and waste management systems should be implemented to address not only the environmental impacts but also enhance the economic benefits of retrieval efforts, thereby encouraging greater participation among fishers.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.