Powering renewable hydrogen production with alternative water sources: Is it economically feasible?

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Sergi Vinardell , Jose Luis Cortina , César Valderrama
{"title":"Powering renewable hydrogen production with alternative water sources: Is it economically feasible?","authors":"Sergi Vinardell ,&nbsp;Jose Luis Cortina ,&nbsp;César Valderrama","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limited access to freshwater is a barrier to implement water electrolysis processes regardless of the availability of renewable energy sources. The present work aims to evaluate the economic potential of green hydrogen production using high-quality water produced from alternative water sources. Specifically, the study focuses on two scenarios where desalted water for the electrolyser is produced from either treated urban wastewater or seawater using membrane technologies. The results illustrated that the water reclamation scheme featured substantially lower costs (0.81–1.02 €/m<sup>3</sup>) than the seawater desalination plant (1.09–1.58 €/m<sup>3</sup>). However, implementing a water production process before the electrolyser only represented a minor impact (&lt; 2.4 %) on the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and specific energy consumption of the integrated system, even with water production costs as high as 10 €/m<sup>3</sup>. The contribution of the specific water consumption to the LCOH ranged between 0.10 and 1.80 % when considering water consumptions between 9 and 15 L/kg<sub>H2</sub>, respectively. The sensitivity analysis illustrated that the impact of water production on the LCOH was nearly negligible when compared with other operating factors, such as the electrolyser efficiency or the load factor. Overall, this study highlights that water production from alternative water sources has a minimal impact on the economic balance of the electrolyser, making it a viable option to support green hydrogen projects in water-scarce regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100457"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125000981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited access to freshwater is a barrier to implement water electrolysis processes regardless of the availability of renewable energy sources. The present work aims to evaluate the economic potential of green hydrogen production using high-quality water produced from alternative water sources. Specifically, the study focuses on two scenarios where desalted water for the electrolyser is produced from either treated urban wastewater or seawater using membrane technologies. The results illustrated that the water reclamation scheme featured substantially lower costs (0.81–1.02 €/m3) than the seawater desalination plant (1.09–1.58 €/m3). However, implementing a water production process before the electrolyser only represented a minor impact (< 2.4 %) on the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and specific energy consumption of the integrated system, even with water production costs as high as 10 €/m3. The contribution of the specific water consumption to the LCOH ranged between 0.10 and 1.80 % when considering water consumptions between 9 and 15 L/kgH2, respectively. The sensitivity analysis illustrated that the impact of water production on the LCOH was nearly negligible when compared with other operating factors, such as the electrolyser efficiency or the load factor. Overall, this study highlights that water production from alternative water sources has a minimal impact on the economic balance of the electrolyser, making it a viable option to support green hydrogen projects in water-scarce regions.
用替代水源为可再生氢生产提供动力:在经济上可行吗?
不论可再生能源是否可得,获得淡水的机会有限是实施水电解过程的障碍。目前的工作旨在评估利用替代水源生产的高质量水的绿色制氢的经济潜力。具体而言,该研究侧重于两种情况,即使用膜技术从处理过的城市废水或海水中生产电解槽所需的脱盐水。结果表明,水回收方案的成本(0.81 ~ 1.02€/m3)明显低于海水淡化厂的成本(1.09 ~ 1.58€/m3)。然而,在电解槽之前实施制水过程只代表了一个很小的影响(<;即使生产水的成本高达10欧元/立方米,该综合系统的氢平准化成本(LCOH)和比能耗也将降低2.4%。当考虑到9至15升/千瓦时的耗水量时,特定耗水量对LCOH的贡献分别在0.10至1.80%之间。敏感性分析表明,与其他操作因素(如电解槽效率或负载系数)相比,产水量对LCOH的影响几乎可以忽略不计。总的来说,这项研究强调,从替代水源生产水对电解槽的经济平衡影响最小,使其成为支持缺水地区绿色氢项目的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信