A comparative analysis on methodologies for determining the saturation fiber point in bamboo

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Peng Li , Xuedong Zheng , Jian Peng , Qunying Mou , Ting Li , Bangyi Luo , Lin He , Xianjun Li , Xiazhen Li
{"title":"A comparative analysis on methodologies for determining the saturation fiber point in bamboo","authors":"Peng Li ,&nbsp;Xuedong Zheng ,&nbsp;Jian Peng ,&nbsp;Qunying Mou ,&nbsp;Ting Li ,&nbsp;Bangyi Luo ,&nbsp;Lin He ,&nbsp;Xianjun Li ,&nbsp;Xiazhen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The stability of dimensional and load-bearing capacity of bamboo, as a green and sustainable engineering material, is critically important during its processing and utilization. Properly managing moisture content through fiber saturation point (FSP) had a significant impact on both bamboo production and its engineering applications. Therefore, the accurate determination of the FSP of bamboo was crucial for practical applications and the effective moisture content control. This study performed a comprehensive analysis on the determination of FSP in bamboo using three methods: LF NMR, mechanical and shrinkage testing. The findings indicated that the FSPs were 23.2 % and 22.3 % as determined by the mechanical method and low-field NMR method, respectively. The shrinkage method produced FSP values of 26.7 %, 26.6 %, and 28.6 % in the longitudinal, tangential and radial directions, respectively. While the three methods yielded comparable experimental outcomes, each demonstrated distinct advantages and limitations in FSP determination. The findings addressed the discrepancies in determining FSPs for bamboo using the three methods and provided essential guidance for the industrial processing and engineering application of bamboo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13581,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Crops and Products","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 121239"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Crops and Products","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092666902500785X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stability of dimensional and load-bearing capacity of bamboo, as a green and sustainable engineering material, is critically important during its processing and utilization. Properly managing moisture content through fiber saturation point (FSP) had a significant impact on both bamboo production and its engineering applications. Therefore, the accurate determination of the FSP of bamboo was crucial for practical applications and the effective moisture content control. This study performed a comprehensive analysis on the determination of FSP in bamboo using three methods: LF NMR, mechanical and shrinkage testing. The findings indicated that the FSPs were 23.2 % and 22.3 % as determined by the mechanical method and low-field NMR method, respectively. The shrinkage method produced FSP values of 26.7 %, 26.6 %, and 28.6 % in the longitudinal, tangential and radial directions, respectively. While the three methods yielded comparable experimental outcomes, each demonstrated distinct advantages and limitations in FSP determination. The findings addressed the discrepancies in determining FSPs for bamboo using the three methods and provided essential guidance for the industrial processing and engineering application of bamboo.
竹材饱和纤维点测定方法的比较分析
竹子作为一种绿色、可持续的工程材料,其尺寸稳定性和承载能力在其加工和利用过程中至关重要。通过纤维饱和点(FSP)控制水分含量对竹材生产和工程应用都有重要影响。因此,准确测定竹材中水分含量对实际应用和有效控制竹材水分含量具有重要意义。本文对竹材中FSP的测定方法进行了综合分析:LF NMR法、力学法和收缩率法。结果表明,机械法和低场核磁共振法测定的FSPs分别为23.2% %和22.3% %。收缩法在纵向、切向和径向上的FSP值分别为26.7 %、26.6 %和28.6 %。虽然这三种方法产生了相似的实验结果,但每种方法在FSP测定中都表现出不同的优势和局限性。研究结果解决了3种方法测定竹中fsp值的差异,为竹的工业加工和工程应用提供了重要的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industrial Crops and Products
Industrial Crops and Products 农林科学-农业工程
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
1518
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Industrial Crops and Products is an International Journal publishing academic and industrial research on industrial (defined as non-food/non-feed) crops and products. Papers concern both crop-oriented and bio-based materials from crops-oriented research, and should be of interest to an international audience, hypothesis driven, and where comparisons are made statistics performed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信