Angus Kittelman , Aaron Mowery , Kathleen M. Conley , Sarah Quinn , Wenjing Bao , Aaron R. Campbell , Fahad Alresheed , Buket Erturk İnal , Wendy Machalicek
{"title":"A systematic literature review of randomization procedures within single-case research designs","authors":"Angus Kittelman , Aaron Mowery , Kathleen M. Conley , Sarah Quinn , Wenjing Bao , Aaron R. Campbell , Fahad Alresheed , Buket Erturk İnal , Wendy Machalicek","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic literature review examined the use of randomization procedures within single-case research designs in the field of education. We identified 717 documents that met our inclusion criteria for reports (articles, dissertations, theses) published or made available between 2010 and 2022. Results indicated a steady increase in the use of randomization procedures over this twelve-year period. Researchers most often included randomization procedures within multiple baseline and alternating treatments designs. The most common types of randomization procedures in order from most to least often reported were within-intervention case randomization, phase-order randomization, between-intervention case randomization, and intervention start-point randomization. In addition, randomization tests were conducted in 8% of studies. Findings of this study provide implications for research when using and reporting randomization procedures. Suggestions for determining suitable student outcomes and educational settings for using randomization procedures within single-case research are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 101458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440525000317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic literature review examined the use of randomization procedures within single-case research designs in the field of education. We identified 717 documents that met our inclusion criteria for reports (articles, dissertations, theses) published or made available between 2010 and 2022. Results indicated a steady increase in the use of randomization procedures over this twelve-year period. Researchers most often included randomization procedures within multiple baseline and alternating treatments designs. The most common types of randomization procedures in order from most to least often reported were within-intervention case randomization, phase-order randomization, between-intervention case randomization, and intervention start-point randomization. In addition, randomization tests were conducted in 8% of studies. Findings of this study provide implications for research when using and reporting randomization procedures. Suggestions for determining suitable student outcomes and educational settings for using randomization procedures within single-case research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.