“Commentary on Twietmeyer’s ‘the plastic person: A response to fry’”

IF 3.7 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Jeffrey P. Fry
{"title":"“Commentary on Twietmeyer’s ‘the plastic person: A response to fry’”","authors":"Jeffrey P. Fry","doi":"10.1016/j.peh.2025.100348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In his response to a book chapter that I wrote for Robert Simon’s anthology entitled <em>The Ethics of Coaching Sports: Moral, Social, and Legal Issues</em> (2013), Gregg Twietmeyer presents a number a criticisms. Underlying his concerns is his view that the brain should not be mistaken for the person. Hence, the notion of a neuroethics of coaching is misfocused. The brain is a feature of the person, but not the person as such. Coaches should have the whole person in focus. In my response, I raise some questions about Twietmeyer’s own views, and I defend, on ethical grounds, a particular concern of coaches for the brains of athletes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19886,"journal":{"name":"Performance enhancement and health","volume":"13 3","pages":"Article 100348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance enhancement and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266925000313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his response to a book chapter that I wrote for Robert Simon’s anthology entitled The Ethics of Coaching Sports: Moral, Social, and Legal Issues (2013), Gregg Twietmeyer presents a number a criticisms. Underlying his concerns is his view that the brain should not be mistaken for the person. Hence, the notion of a neuroethics of coaching is misfocused. The brain is a feature of the person, but not the person as such. Coaches should have the whole person in focus. In my response, I raise some questions about Twietmeyer’s own views, and I defend, on ethical grounds, a particular concern of coaches for the brains of athletes.
对Twietmeyer的《塑料人:对fry的回应》的评论
在我为罗伯特·西蒙的选集《体育教练的伦理:道德、社会和法律问题》(2013)所写的一章中,格雷格·特维特梅尔提出了一些批评。他的担忧背后是他的观点,即大脑不应该被误认为是人。因此,教练神经伦理学的概念是错误的。大脑是人的一个特征,而不是人本身。教练应该关注整个人。在我的回应中,我对Twietmeyer自己的观点提出了一些质疑,并从道德角度为教练对运动员大脑的特别关注辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Performance enhancement and health
Performance enhancement and health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信