Comparative modelling of foetal exposure to maternal long-acting injectable versus oral daily antipsychotics.

npj women's health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI:10.1038/s44294-025-00077-9
Philip Bediako-Kakari, Mariella Monyo, Shakir Atoyebi, Adeniyi Olagunju
{"title":"Comparative modelling of foetal exposure to maternal long-acting injectable versus oral daily antipsychotics.","authors":"Philip Bediako-Kakari, Mariella Monyo, Shakir Atoyebi, Adeniyi Olagunju","doi":"10.1038/s44294-025-00077-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study employed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling to compare the extent of foetal exposure between oral and long-acting injectable (LAI) aripiprazole and olanzapine. Adult and pregnancy PBPK models were developed and validated with relevant clinical data. Relevant indices of foetal exposure during pregnancy were predicted from concentration-time data at steady-state dosing for both oral and LAI formulations. Foetal C<sub>max</sub> for aripiprazole was 59-78% higher with LAI than oral, and 68-181% higher with LAI olanzapine than the oral formulation. Predicted cord:maternal ratios (range) were 0.59-0.69 for oral aripiprazole and 0.61-0.66 for LAI aripiprazole, 0.34-0.64 for oral olanzapine and 0.89-0.96 for LAI olanzapine. Also, cumulative foetal exposure over 28 days from oral formulations were generally predicted to be lower compared with their therapeutic-equivalent LAI. As <i>in utero</i> foetal exposure to maternal drugs does not necessarily translate to risk, these data should be interpreted in a broader context that includes benefit-risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":520241,"journal":{"name":"npj women's health","volume":"3 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44294-025-00077-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study employed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling to compare the extent of foetal exposure between oral and long-acting injectable (LAI) aripiprazole and olanzapine. Adult and pregnancy PBPK models were developed and validated with relevant clinical data. Relevant indices of foetal exposure during pregnancy were predicted from concentration-time data at steady-state dosing for both oral and LAI formulations. Foetal Cmax for aripiprazole was 59-78% higher with LAI than oral, and 68-181% higher with LAI olanzapine than the oral formulation. Predicted cord:maternal ratios (range) were 0.59-0.69 for oral aripiprazole and 0.61-0.66 for LAI aripiprazole, 0.34-0.64 for oral olanzapine and 0.89-0.96 for LAI olanzapine. Also, cumulative foetal exposure over 28 days from oral formulations were generally predicted to be lower compared with their therapeutic-equivalent LAI. As in utero foetal exposure to maternal drugs does not necessarily translate to risk, these data should be interpreted in a broader context that includes benefit-risk assessments.

胎儿暴露于母体长效注射与口服每日抗精神病药物的比较模型。
本研究采用基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型来比较口服和长效注射(LAI)阿立哌唑和奥氮平对胎儿的暴露程度。建立成人和妊娠PBPK模型,并结合相关临床数据进行验证。根据口服和LAI制剂在稳态剂量下的浓度-时间数据预测妊娠期间胎儿暴露的相关指数。阿立哌唑与LAI组的Cmax比口服高59-78%,奥氮平与LAI组的Cmax比口服高68-181%。预测脐带:产妇比率(范围)口服阿立哌唑为0.59-0.69,LAI为0.61-0.66,口服奥氮平为0.34-0.64,LAI为0.89-0.96。此外,一般预测,与等效治疗LAI相比,28天内口服配方的累积胎儿暴露量会更低。由于胎儿在子宫内接触母体药物不一定转化为风险,这些数据应在更广泛的背景下解释,包括利益-风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信