Establishing the performance and acceptability of dried blood spot sampling to screen for islet-specific autoantibodies

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Siân E. Faustini, Lauren M. Quinn, Madeeha Hoque, Siobhan Young, Christopher Bentley, Hin-Fai Kwok, Timothy Plant, Ian Litchfield, Felicity Boardman, Sheila M. Greenfield, Parth Narendran, Alex G. Richter
{"title":"Establishing the performance and acceptability of dried blood spot sampling to screen for islet-specific autoantibodies","authors":"Siân E. Faustini,&nbsp;Lauren M. Quinn,&nbsp;Madeeha Hoque,&nbsp;Siobhan Young,&nbsp;Christopher Bentley,&nbsp;Hin-Fai Kwok,&nbsp;Timothy Plant,&nbsp;Ian Litchfield,&nbsp;Felicity Boardman,&nbsp;Sheila M. Greenfield,&nbsp;Parth Narendran,&nbsp;Alex G. Richter","doi":"10.1111/dme.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Islet-specific autoantibodies predate and predict the onset of type 1 diabetes and can be used to screen for presymptomatic disease. Dried blood spots (DBS) offer a convenient and reliable method for community-based capillary sampling requiring low blood volumes compared to venous collection. We aimed to verify the use of DBS for detecting autoantibodies by the ElisaRSR (3-screen) multiplex assay compared to venous sampling and also explore the acceptability of DBS sampling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Paired serum and DBS samples were collected from healthy controls (HC) and individuals with type 1 diabetes on insulin. Validation and verification of a 3-screen Islet cell autoantibody (IA-2A, GADA and ZnT8A) ELISA assay was undertaken for both matrices and compared. Perceived acceptability of DBS testing was explored via semi-structured interviews with parents and professional stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Temporally paired serum and DBS samples were collected for 101 individuals with type 1 diabetes (aged 7–73 years) and 22 HC (aged 18–60 years). Performance characteristics were similar for serum and DBS; sensitivity for serum was 86% compared to 89% for DBS and a specificity of 97% for serum compared to 100% for DBS. Parents (<i>n</i> = 38) and stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 25) thought DBS testing offered a minimally invasive, convenient screening test. Parents emphasised choice of screening location, including home and community settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DBS sampling can be used as an alternative to serum for use with the 3-screen assay for general population type 1 diabetes autoantibody screening. DBS sampling appears acceptable to parents and stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":"42 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.70071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Islet-specific autoantibodies predate and predict the onset of type 1 diabetes and can be used to screen for presymptomatic disease. Dried blood spots (DBS) offer a convenient and reliable method for community-based capillary sampling requiring low blood volumes compared to venous collection. We aimed to verify the use of DBS for detecting autoantibodies by the ElisaRSR (3-screen) multiplex assay compared to venous sampling and also explore the acceptability of DBS sampling.

Methods

Paired serum and DBS samples were collected from healthy controls (HC) and individuals with type 1 diabetes on insulin. Validation and verification of a 3-screen Islet cell autoantibody (IA-2A, GADA and ZnT8A) ELISA assay was undertaken for both matrices and compared. Perceived acceptability of DBS testing was explored via semi-structured interviews with parents and professional stakeholders.

Results

Temporally paired serum and DBS samples were collected for 101 individuals with type 1 diabetes (aged 7–73 years) and 22 HC (aged 18–60 years). Performance characteristics were similar for serum and DBS; sensitivity for serum was 86% compared to 89% for DBS and a specificity of 97% for serum compared to 100% for DBS. Parents (n = 38) and stakeholders (n = 25) thought DBS testing offered a minimally invasive, convenient screening test. Parents emphasised choice of screening location, including home and community settings.

Conclusions

DBS sampling can be used as an alternative to serum for use with the 3-screen assay for general population type 1 diabetes autoantibody screening. DBS sampling appears acceptable to parents and stakeholders.

Abstract Image

建立干血斑点取样筛选胰岛特异性自身抗体的性能和可接受性。
背景:胰岛特异性自身抗体可提前预测1型糖尿病的发病,并可用于筛查症状前疾病。干血点(DBS)为社区毛细血管采样提供了一种方便可靠的方法,与静脉采集相比,需要的血容量较少。我们的目的是通过ElisaRSR (3-screen)多重试验来验证DBS与静脉取样相比检测自身抗体的使用,并探讨DBS取样的可接受性。方法:采集健康对照(HC)和胰岛素依赖型1型糖尿病患者的配对血清和DBS样本。对两种基质进行了3筛选胰岛细胞自身抗体(IA-2A, GADA和ZnT8A) ELISA检测并进行了比较。通过与家长和专业利益相关者的半结构化访谈,探讨了DBS测试的可接受性。结果:收集了101例1型糖尿病患者(7-73岁)和22例HC患者(18-60岁)的暂时性配对血清和DBS样本。血清和DBS的性能特征相似;血清的敏感性为86%,而DBS为89%;血清的特异性为97%,而DBS为100%。家长(n = 38)和利益相关者(n = 25)认为DBS测试提供了一种微创、方便的筛查测试。家长强调了筛查地点的选择,包括家庭和社区环境。结论:DBS取样可替代血清,用于普通人群1型糖尿病自身抗体筛查的3筛选试验。家长和利益相关者似乎可以接受星展银行的抽样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信