Changes in sleep architecture during recurrent cycles of sleep restriction: a comparison between stable and variable short sleep schedules.

Tiffany B Koa, Ju Lynn Ong, June C Lo
{"title":"Changes in sleep architecture during recurrent cycles of sleep restriction: a comparison between stable and variable short sleep schedules.","authors":"Tiffany B Koa, Ju Lynn Ong, June C Lo","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To examine how sleep architecture changes over successive cycles of restricted and recovery sleep in young adults, and to determine whether sleep-restricted schedules with differing night-to-night variability in sleep durations lead to different sleep physiological responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 15-night laboratory-based study, 52 healthy young adults (25 males, age: 21-28) were randomly assigned to one of three sleep schedules: stable short, variable short, or control. They underwent two baseline nights of 8-h time-in-bed (TIB), followed by two cycles of \"weekday\" sleep opportunity manipulation and \"weekend\" recovery (8-h TIB). During each manipulation period, the stable short sleep and the control groups received 6-h and 8-h TIBs each night, respectively, while the variable short sleep group received 8-h, 4-h, 8-h, 4-h, and 6-h TIBs from the first to the fifth night. Polysomnography was conducted every night.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleep architecture changes induced by both short sleep schedules returned to baseline levels following the first or second recovery night and were largely similar between the first and second periods of sleep restriction. Sleep parameters averaged across each sleep restriction or recovery period showed no significant differences between the two short sleep groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The similar sleep physiological responses in the two sleep restriction periods suggest that in young adults, sleep architecture does not adapt to recurrent weeks of moderate partial sleep loss, and such sleep patterns did not have compounding effects on sleep architecture. Furthermore, overall, increasing night-to-night variability in sleep duration did not have much additional impact on sleep physiological responses relative to a stable short sleep schedule.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial: </strong>Performance, Mood, and Brain and Metabolic Functions During Different Sleep Schedules (STAVAR), https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04731662, NCT04731662.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"6 2","pages":"zpaf016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: To examine how sleep architecture changes over successive cycles of restricted and recovery sleep in young adults, and to determine whether sleep-restricted schedules with differing night-to-night variability in sleep durations lead to different sleep physiological responses.

Methods: In this 15-night laboratory-based study, 52 healthy young adults (25 males, age: 21-28) were randomly assigned to one of three sleep schedules: stable short, variable short, or control. They underwent two baseline nights of 8-h time-in-bed (TIB), followed by two cycles of "weekday" sleep opportunity manipulation and "weekend" recovery (8-h TIB). During each manipulation period, the stable short sleep and the control groups received 6-h and 8-h TIBs each night, respectively, while the variable short sleep group received 8-h, 4-h, 8-h, 4-h, and 6-h TIBs from the first to the fifth night. Polysomnography was conducted every night.

Results: Sleep architecture changes induced by both short sleep schedules returned to baseline levels following the first or second recovery night and were largely similar between the first and second periods of sleep restriction. Sleep parameters averaged across each sleep restriction or recovery period showed no significant differences between the two short sleep groups.

Conclusions: The similar sleep physiological responses in the two sleep restriction periods suggest that in young adults, sleep architecture does not adapt to recurrent weeks of moderate partial sleep loss, and such sleep patterns did not have compounding effects on sleep architecture. Furthermore, overall, increasing night-to-night variability in sleep duration did not have much additional impact on sleep physiological responses relative to a stable short sleep schedule.

Clinical trial: Performance, Mood, and Brain and Metabolic Functions During Different Sleep Schedules (STAVAR), https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04731662, NCT04731662.

睡眠限制循环中睡眠结构的变化:稳定和可变短睡眠时间表的比较。
研究目的:研究年轻人的睡眠结构在限制性睡眠和恢复性睡眠的连续周期中是如何变化的,并确定睡眠持续时间不同的限制性睡眠时间表是否会导致不同的睡眠生理反应。方法:在这项为期15晚的实验室研究中,52名健康的年轻成年人(25名男性,年龄:21-28岁)被随机分配到三种睡眠计划中的一种:稳定短睡眠、可变短睡眠或控制睡眠。他们经历了两个8小时卧床时间(TIB)的基准夜,随后是两个“工作日”睡眠机会操纵和“周末”恢复周期(8小时TIB)。在每个操作期间,稳定短睡眠组和对照组分别每晚接受6小时和8小时的TIBs,而可变短睡眠组从第1晚到第5晚分别接受8小时、4小时、8小时、4小时和6小时的TIBs。每晚进行多导睡眠描记术。结果:在第一个或第二个恢复夜之后,两种短睡眠计划引起的睡眠结构变化都恢复到基线水平,并且在第一个和第二个睡眠限制期间基本相似。每个睡眠限制期或恢复期的平均睡眠参数在两个短睡眠组之间没有显着差异。结论:两个睡眠限制期相似的睡眠生理反应表明,在年轻人中,睡眠结构不适应周期性的中度部分睡眠缺失,这种睡眠模式对睡眠结构没有复合效应。此外,总的来说,相对于稳定的短睡眠时间表,增加夜间睡眠时间的可变性对睡眠生理反应没有太大的额外影响。临床试验:不同睡眠时间下的表现、情绪和脑代谢功能(STAVAR), https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04731662, NCT04731662。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信