Application of the Robson classification in assessing cesarean section rates: an audit of a tertiary care hospital's gynecology department in Karachi, Pakistan.

IF 3.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Therapeutic advances in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334941251339710
Syed Muhammad Aqeel Abidi, Syeda Namayah Fatima Hussain, Shahida Abbas, Syeda Tayyaba Fatima Abidi, Sonia Haresh
{"title":"Application of the Robson classification in assessing cesarean section rates: an audit of a tertiary care hospital's gynecology department in Karachi, Pakistan.","authors":"Syed Muhammad Aqeel Abidi, Syeda Namayah Fatima Hussain, Shahida Abbas, Syeda Tayyaba Fatima Abidi, Sonia Haresh","doi":"10.1177/26334941251339710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rising rate of cesarean sections (CSs) has become a global concern due to its implications for maternal and neonatal health. The World Health Organization recommends that CS rates should not exceed 10-15% at the population level. However, many countries report rates well above this threshold.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate CS rates using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) and identify the major contributing groups to develop targeted strategies for reducing unnecessary cesarean deliveries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective clinical audit based on standardized classification and descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit was conducted using hospital delivery records from January 1st to December 31st, 2022, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Holy Family Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. All CSs were categorized into 10 groups using the Robson classification system. Descriptive statistics were used to determine group size, CS rate within each group, relative contribution to the overall CS rate, and absolute group contribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1464 deliveries occurred during the study period, including 507 CSs. Of these, 48.8% were elective and 51.2% were emergency CS. The major contributors to the CS rate were group 5 (51.9%), group 2 (18.5%), and group 10 (14.4%). The leading indications for cesarean delivery were previous CS (32.3%), non-progress of labor (21.15%), and cephalopelvic disproportion (16.92%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted strategies such as promoting vaginal birth after cesarean, implementing standardized labor monitoring protocols, and strengthening antenatal counseling can help reduce unnecessary CS while maintaining maternal and neonatal safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":75219,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","volume":"19 ","pages":"26334941251339710"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334941251339710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rising rate of cesarean sections (CSs) has become a global concern due to its implications for maternal and neonatal health. The World Health Organization recommends that CS rates should not exceed 10-15% at the population level. However, many countries report rates well above this threshold.

Objectives: To evaluate CS rates using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) and identify the major contributing groups to develop targeted strategies for reducing unnecessary cesarean deliveries.

Design: A retrospective clinical audit based on standardized classification and descriptive analysis.

Methods: This retrospective audit was conducted using hospital delivery records from January 1st to December 31st, 2022, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Holy Family Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. All CSs were categorized into 10 groups using the Robson classification system. Descriptive statistics were used to determine group size, CS rate within each group, relative contribution to the overall CS rate, and absolute group contribution.

Results: A total of 1464 deliveries occurred during the study period, including 507 CSs. Of these, 48.8% were elective and 51.2% were emergency CS. The major contributors to the CS rate were group 5 (51.9%), group 2 (18.5%), and group 10 (14.4%). The leading indications for cesarean delivery were previous CS (32.3%), non-progress of labor (21.15%), and cephalopelvic disproportion (16.92%).

Conclusion: Targeted strategies such as promoting vaginal birth after cesarean, implementing standardized labor monitoring protocols, and strengthening antenatal counseling can help reduce unnecessary CS while maintaining maternal and neonatal safety.

应用罗布森分类评估剖宫产率:审计三级护理医院的妇科在卡拉奇,巴基斯坦。
背景:由于对孕产妇和新生儿健康的影响,剖宫产率的上升已成为全球关注的问题。世界卫生组织建议,在人口水平上,CS率不应超过10-15%。然而,许多国家报告的比率远高于这一阈值。目的:利用Robson十组分类系统(TGCS)评估剖宫产率,并确定主要贡献组,以制定有针对性的策略,减少不必要的剖宫产。设计:基于标准化分类和描述性分析的回顾性临床审计。方法:对巴基斯坦卡拉奇圣家医院妇产科2022年1月1日至12月31日的分娩记录进行回顾性审核。使用Robson分类系统将所有CSs分为10组。描述性统计用于确定组大小、每组内的CS率、对总体CS率的相对贡献和绝对组贡献。结果:研究期间共发生1464例分娩,其中507例CSs。其中48.8%为选择性CS, 51.2%为紧急CS。对CS率影响最大的是5组(51.9%)、2组(18.5%)和10组(14.4%)。剖宫产的主要指征为既往CS(32.3%)、分娩无进展(21.15%)和头骨盆比例失调(16.92%)。结论:促进剖宫产后顺产、实施标准化产程监测方案、加强产前咨询等有针对性的策略有助于减少不必要的剖腹产,同时维护孕产妇和新生儿安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信